Results 11 - 20 of 2,567

Table 8: Reasons for Not Documenting DR

in Table of Contents
by Cecses Centre 2005
"... In PAGE 13: ...Table 8: Reasons for Not Documenting DR Table8 summarizes the responses to the reasons for not documenting DR. These results reveal that lack of time/budget (60.... ..."

Table I. Dr(z)

in Using Continued Fraction Expansion to Discretize Fractional Order Derivatives
by Yangquan Chen, Blas M. Vinagre, Igor Podlubny

Table 2: Importance of DR for Justification

in Table of Contents
by Cecses Centre 2005

Table 4: Udfaldstabel for dr gtighedstest

in unknown title
by unknown authors

Table 1. Grading criteria mapped to individual effort grading. Grading

in Evaluating Individual Contribution Toward Group Software Engineering Projects
by Jane Huffman Hayes, Timothy C. Lethbridge, Daniel Port 2003
"... In PAGE 5: ... The quizzes also need to contain more detailed, team-specific project questions. In Table1 , each of the above grading schemes has been mapped to the grading criteria discussed earlier. Note that no single scheme meets all the grading criteria.... ..."
Cited by 6

Table 4 Average class size: School survey results Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 All grades

in FCND DP No.149
by Fcnd Discussion Paper, Akhter U. Ahmed, Mary Arends-kuenning 2003
"... In PAGE 22: ... Because of increased enrollment and class attendance rates, classrooms of FFE schools are more crowded than non-FFE school classrooms. Data in Table4 indicate that, on the average, FFE school classrooms have about 22 percent more students than non-FFE school classrooms. Table 4 Average class size: School survey results Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 All grades ... ..."

Table 2. Radiation pneumonitis grading system. Grading system Grade Definition

in unknown title
by unknown authors 2007

Table 1. Grading scheme

in Simulating Corporate Project Engineering for Freshmen
by Eric Wang Richard
"... In PAGE 3: ... Grading Scheme The grading method used is both unique and complex. As shown in Table1 , the final grade is based on four components: Discussion (10%), Skills Lab (30%), Product Development Lab (50%), and Merit (10%). A rigid scale (i.... ..."

Table 1. Characteristics of full-time and part-time students

in E-CLASSROOM IN HIGHER EDUCATION
by Mag Viktorija Sulčič, Dr. Dušan Lesjak
"... In PAGE 9: ...refer interactive materials than female students (-0.30). Males did not print the material very often. The stepwise regression confirmed statistically significant correlation between the frequency of printing materials and their wish for using the interactive study materials ( Table1 0). Table 10.... In PAGE 10: ....2.6. Student opinions about course implementation At the end of the term, students were asked about their opinion on the implementation of the course ( Table1 1). Table 11.... ..."

Table 8 Student Design Performance by Dimension Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12

in Articles An Assessment Model for a Design Approach to Technological Problem Solving
by Rodney Custer Brigitte, Brigitte G. Valesey, Barry N. Burke
"... In PAGE 13: ...478 .277 To further refine the analysis of student characteristics, the data were also analyzed by grade level (see Table8 ). Note that 12th grade student performance was highest, particularly on Dimensions #2 and #3.... ..."
Results 11 - 20 of 2,567