DMCA
APPLICATION OF A GLOBAL 3D MODEL TO IMPROVE REGIONAL EVENT LOCATIONS
BibTeX
@MISC{Levshin_applicationof,
author = {A. L. Levshin and M. H. Ritzwoller},
title = {APPLICATION OF A GLOBAL 3D MODEL TO IMPROVE REGIONAL EVENT LOCATIONS},
year = {}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
Accurate location of weak seismic events is crucial for monitoring clandestine nuclear tests, for studying local seismic structures, and for assessing possible seismic hazards. Outside of a few regions with dense seismic networks, weak seismic events (with magnitude less than 4) are usually sparsely recorded at epicentral distances less than 20°. Because of lateral variations in crustal and upper mantle structures, observed travel times of seismic phases deviate significantly from predictions based on 1-dimensional (1D) seismic models. Accurately locating weak seismic events remains a difficult task for modern seismology. Perhaps the most promising solution to this problem is the use of a 3-dimensional (3D) model of the Earth. Here we present the results of a validation test in which, using the 3D model SR2002 of the crust and upper mantle and regional phase data alone, we relocate ~ 200 earthquakes and nuclear explosions in Eurasia. The 3D model is constructed using surface wave dispersion data. The event locations using the 3D model are compared with so-called Ground Truth data, either known by non-seismic means or validated by cluster analysis, with location accuracy mostly 5 km or better. Typically, the 3D model reduces the location errors to about half the values attained with the 1D model; i.e., ~ 18 km location errors are reduced to about 9 km. This test indicates that the location of regional events can be significantly improved by using a global 3D model.
Keyphrases
weak seismic event model improve regional event location travel time model sr2002 dense seismic network dispersion data seismic model km location error upper mantle validation test accurate location event location local seismic structure location accuracy difficult task nuclear explosion lateral variation seismic phase non-seismic mean promising solution possible seismic hazard location error clandestine nuclear test modern seismology regional event upper mantle structure epicentral distance regional phase data so-called ground truth data cluster analysis
