DMCA
A Comparison of the Mathematical Proof Languages Mizar and Isar (2002)
| Venue: | Journal of Automated Reasoning |
| Citations: | 10 - 3 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Wenzel02acomparison,
author = {Markus Wenzel and Freek Wiedijk},
title = {A Comparison of the Mathematical Proof Languages Mizar and Isar},
journal = {Journal of Automated Reasoning},
year = {2002},
volume = {29},
pages = {2002}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
The mathematical proof checker Mizar by Andrzej Trybulec uses a proof input language that is much more readable than the input languages of most other proof assistants. This system also di#ers in many other respects from most current systems. John Harrison has shown that one can have a Mizar mode on top of a tactical prover, allowing one to combine a mathematical proof language with other styles of proof checking. Currently the only fully developed Mizar mode in this style is the Isar proof language for the Isabelle theorem prover. In fact the Isar language has become the o#cial input language to the Isabelle system, even though many users still use its low-level tactical part only.
Keyphrases
mathematical proof language mizar mizar mode mathematical proof checker mizar many respect john harrison input language isabelle system isabelle theorem prover mathematical proof language isar language cial input language andrzej trybulec current system proof input language low-level tactical part isar proof language tactical prover many user proof checking proof assistant
