DMCA
Practical Power of Hybrid Architectural Approaches in Integrating Processes, Data and Services Between Businesses and Administrations
BibTeX
@MISC{Charalabidis_practicalpower,
author = {Yannis Charalabidis and Hervé Panetto and Euripidis Loukis and Kai Mertins (eds and George Gionis and Sotiris Koussouris and Dimitris Askounis},
title = {Practical Power of Hybrid Architectural Approaches in Integrating Processes, Data and Services Between Businesses and Administrations},
year = {}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
Abstract. Escalating economic and societal demands of today, along with the continuous advancements in ICT, push enterprises and administrations to move towards networked paradigms and leverage electronic transactions in their everyday practices. Although technical solutions providing the necessary interoperability means to enable such practices have been rigorously provided during the last years, their adoption and application by the foregoing stakeholders still remains limited. Several qualities of the existing solutions in technical and business level concerning the way the manage workflows, data mappings, business and legal rules along with the use of proprietary technologies and their inability to be readily set up and deployed, act as the main inhibitors for any potential users. The present work discusses the characteristics of the predominant centralized and decentralized architectural patterns for eTransactions, identifies the weak points of every case and proposes a hybrid architectural approach that brings together the “best of breed ” of both paradigms. Additionally, specific insights, methodologies and underlying technologies are proposed with an objective to support the effective implementation of the proposed architecture and its basic components.
Keyphrases
hybrid architectural approach practical power integrating process service business underlying technology predominant centralized weak point foregoing stakeholder legal rule present work last year data mapping everyday practice continuous advancement several quality main inhibitor specific insight necessary interoperability leverage electronic transaction basic component decentralized architectural pattern business level societal demand proprietary technology push enterprise effective implementation potential user technical solution
