DMCA
Decentralization of Governance and Development (2002)
| Venue: | Journal of Economic Perspectives |
| Citations: | 208 - 3 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Bardhan02decentralizationof,
author = {Pranab Bardhan},
title = {Decentralization of Governance and Development},
journal = {Journal of Economic Perspectives},
year = {2002},
pages = {185--205}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
A ll around the world in matters of governance, decentralization is the rage.Even apart from the widely debated issues of subsidiarity and devolution inthe European Union and states ’ rights in the United States, decentraliza-tion has been at the center stage of policy experiments in the last two decades in a large number of developing and transition economies in Latin America, Africa and Asia. The World Bank, for example, has embraced it as one of the major governance reforms on its agenda (for example, World Bank, 2000; Burki, Perry and Dillinger, 1999). Take also the examples of the two largest countries of the world, China and India. Decentralization has been regarded as the major institu-tional framework for the phenomenal industrial growth in the last two decades in China, taking place largely in the nonstate nonprivate sector. India ushered in a landmark constitutional reform in favor of decentralization around the same time it launched a major program of economic reform in the early 1990s. On account of its many failures, the centralized state everywhere has lost a great deal of legitimacy, and decentralization is widely believed to promise a range of bene ts. It is often suggested as a way of reducing the role of the state in general, by fragmenting central authority and introducing more intergovernmental com-petition and checks and balances. It is viewed as a way to make government more responsive and efcient. Technological changes have also made it somewhat easier than before to provide public services (like electricity and water supply) relatively ef ciently in smaller market areas, and the lower levels of government have now a greater ability to handle certain tasks. In a world of rampant ethnic con icts and separatist movements, decentralization is also regarded as a way of diffusing social and political tensions and ensuring local cultural and political autonomy. These potential bene ts of decentralization have attracted a very diverse range
Keyphrases
world bank intergovernmental com-petition major program rampant ethnic con icts water supply center stage nonstate nonprivate sector large number policy experiment public service phenomenal industrial growth state right major institu-tional framework political tension transition economy major governance reform separatist movement market area bene t centralized state devolution inthe european union many failure political autonomy diverse range great deal potential bene t latin america central authority economic reform landmark constitutional reform certain task technological change united state
