DMCA
Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness (1998)
| Venue: | International Journal of Game Theory |
| Citations: | 116 - 1 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Bolton98dictatorgame,
author = {Gary E. Bolton and Elena Katok and Rami Zwick},
title = {Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness},
journal = {International Journal of Game Theory},
year = {1998},
volume = {27},
pages = {269--299}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
In both dictator and impunity games, one player, the dictator, divides a fixed amount of money between himself and one other, the recipient. Recent lab studies of these games have produced seemingly inconsistent results, reporting substantially divergent amounts of dictator giving. Also, one prominent explanation for some of these differences, the impact of experimenter observation, displayed weak explanatory power in a different but related lab game. Data from the new experiment reported here offers some explanations. We find that dictators determine how much they will give on the basis of the total money available for the entire experimental session, not on the basis of what is available per game. This explains the reported differences between impunity and dictator studies. When distributing a gift among several recipients, individual dictators show little tendency towards equal treatment. Also, we find no evidence for the experimenter observation effect. Comparison with earlier experiments suggest...
Keyphrases
fairness versus act dictator game total money inconsistent result individual dictator little tendency towards equal treatment prominent explanation reported difference fixed amount related lab game dictator study weak explanatory power recent lab study several recipient new experiment impunity game divergent amount experimenter observation effect entire experimental session experimenter observation
