BibTeX
@MISC{01traceabilitymatrix,
author = {},
title = {Traceability Matrix prepared by Mike Rawlins.},
year = {2001}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
The Quality Review team have completed their review of Collaboration-Protocol Profile and Agreement Specification v0.93 as submitted by the Trading Partner team on March 21st 2001. We recommend that this specification go immediately for its second round of public review. The Quality Review team have identified some areas where the quality of this specification may be improved, both in its content and its presentation. These comments should be addressed as part of the public review process. The key areas of comment from the Quality Review team relate to: No Change or Disposition log provided – Whilst the Quality Review team are satisified that our earlier comments have been accommodated, we have no way of telling if there were any general public comments and whether they have been dealt appropriately or not. Given the high quality of this document, we consider this is most likely a clerical oversight. However, we would ask that these logs be provided as part of the public review material. Use of ‘pseudo-XML ’ examples – The specification tends to use fragments of XML documents (with comments) to illustrate definitions (e.g. lines 456-481). This is not consistent with other specifications and we would suggest that the editors either use the actual DTD (or Schema) to show the structure or use a full example.
Keyphrases
quality review team mike rawlins traceability matrix full example general public comment public review quality review team relate trading partner team actual dtd pseudo-xml example high quality key area agreement specification v0 second round public review material disposition log clerical oversight collaboration-protocol profile xml document public review process
