DMCA
On the Difference between Updating a Knowledge Base and Revising it (0)
| Citations: | 471 - 8 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Katsuno_onthe,
author = {Hirofumi Katsuno and Alberto O. Mendelzon},
title = {On the Difference between Updating a Knowledge Base and Revising it},
booktitle = {},
year = {},
pages = {387--394},
publisher = {Morgan Kaufmann}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
this paper, we argue that no such set of postulates will be adequate for every application. In particular, we make a fundamental distinction between two kinds of modifications to a knowledge base. The first one, update, consists of bringing the knowledge base up to date when the world described by it changes. For example, most database updates are of this variety, e.g. "increase Joe's salary by 5%". Another example is the incorporation into the knowledge base of changes caused in the world by the actions of a robot (Ginsberg and Smith 1987, Winslett 1988, Winslett 1990) . We show that the AGM postulates must be drastically modified to describe update. The second type of modification, revision, is used when we are obtaining new information about a static world. For example, we may be trying to diagnose a faulty circuit and want to incorporate into the knowledge base the results of successive tests, where newer results may contradict old ones. We claim the AGM postulates describe only revision.
