• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

DMCA

Leveraging data and structure in ontology integration (2007)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [linqs.cs.umd.edu]
  • [www.ahnu.edu.cn]
  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [linqs.cs.umd.edu]
  • [linqs.cs.umd.edu]
  • [om.umiacs.umd.edu]
  • [se-pubs.dbs.uni-leipzig.de]
  • [www.cs.toronto.edu]
  • [www.cse.buffalo.edu]
  • [www.cse.buffalo.edu]
  • [www.cse.buffalo.edu]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Octavian Udrea , Lise Getoor , Renée J. Miller
Venue:In SIGMOD Conference
Citations:38 - 3 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@INPROCEEDINGS{Udrea07leveragingdata,
    author = {Octavian Udrea and Lise Getoor and Renée J. Miller},
    title = {Leveraging data and structure in ontology integration},
    booktitle = {In SIGMOD Conference},
    year = {2007}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

There is a great deal of research on ontology integration which makes use of rich logical constraints to reason about the structural and logical alignment of ontologies. There is also considerable work on matching data instances from heterogeneous schema or ontologies. However, little work exploits the fact that ontologies include both data and structure. We aim to close this gap by presenting a new algorithm (ILIADS) that tightly integrates both data matching and logical reasoning to achieve better matching of ontologies. We evaluate our algorithm on a set of 30 pairs of OWL Lite ontologies with the schema and data matchings found by human reviewers. We compare against two systems-the ontology matching tool FCA-merge [28] and the schema matching tool COMA++ [1]. ILIADS shows an average improvement of 25 % in quality over FCA-merge and a 11% improvement in recall over COMA++.

Keyphrases

ontology integration    logical reasoning    tool fca-merge    rich logical constraint    owl lite ontology    data matching    tool coma    data matchings    considerable work    human reviewer    little work    great deal    average improvement    systems-the ontology    new algorithm    logical alignment    data instance    heterogeneous schema   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University