• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

An optimal minimum spanning tree algorithm (2000)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.eecs.umich.edu]
  • [www.cs.princeton.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]
  • [www.cs.princeton.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]
  • [web.eecs.umich.edu]
  • [www.cs.ust.hk]
  • [web.eecs.umich.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]
  • [www.cs.utexas.edu]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Seth Pettie , Vijaya Ramachandran
Venue:J. ACM
Citations:58 - 11 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{Pettie00anoptimal,
    author = {Seth Pettie and Vijaya Ramachandran},
    title = {An optimal minimum spanning tree algorithm},
    journal = {J. ACM},
    year = {2000},
    volume = {49},
    pages = {49--60}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Abstract. We establish that the algorithmic complexity of the minimum spanning tree problem is equal to its decision-tree complexity. Specifically, we present a deterministic algorithm to find a minimum spanning tree of a graph with n vertices and m edges that runs in time O(T ∗ (m, n)) where T ∗ is the minimum number of edge-weight comparisons needed to determine the solution. The algorithm is quite simple and can be implemented on a pointer machine. Although our time bound is optimal, the exact function describing it is not known at present. The current best bounds known for T ∗ are T ∗ (m, n) = �(m) and T ∗ (m, n) = O(m · α(m, n)), where α is a certain natural inverse of Ackermann’s function. Even under the assumption that T ∗ is superlinear, we show that if the input graph is selected from Gn,m, our algorithm runs in linear time with high probability, regardless of n, m, or the permutation of edge weights. The analysis uses a new martingale for Gn,m similar to the edge-exposure martingale for Gn,p.

Keyphrases

optimal minimum spanning tree algorithm    new martingale    minimum spanning tree problem    edge-exposure martingale    deterministic algorithm    minimum number    certain natural inverse    linear time    pointer machine    time bound    edge weight    minimum spanning tree    ackermann function    algorithmic complexity    high probability    exact function    input graph    decision-tree complexity    edge-weight comparison   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University