• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

DMCA

Scalable Application Layer Multicast (2002)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [dslab.csie.ncu.edu.tw]
  • [www.cs.wisc.edu]
  • [www.cs.wisc.edu]
  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [www.cs.umd.edu]
  • [drum.lib.umd.edu]
  • [drum.lib.umd.edu]
  • [drum.lib.umd.edu]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Suman Banerjee , Bobby Bhattacharjee , Christopher Kommareddy
Citations:731 - 21 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Banerjee02scalableapplication,
    author = {Suman Banerjee and Bobby Bhattacharjee and Christopher Kommareddy},
    title = { Scalable Application Layer Multicast},
    year = {2002}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

We describe a new scalable application-layer multicast protocol, specifically designed for low-bandwidth, data streaming applications with large receiver sets. Our scheme is based upon a hierarchical clustering of the application-layer multicast peers and can support a number of different data delivery trees with desirable properties. We present extensive simulations of both our protocol and the Narada application-layer multicast protocol over Internet-like topologies. Our results show that for groups of size 32 or more, our protocol has lower link stress (by about 25%), improved or similar endto-end latencies and similar failure recovery properties. More importantly, it is able to achieve these results by using orders of magnitude lower control traffic. Finally, we present results from our wide-area testbed in which we experimented with 32-100 member groups distributed over 8 different sites. In our experiments, averagegroup members established and maintained low-latency paths and incurred a maximum packet loss rate of less than 1 % as members randomly joined and left the multicast group. The average control overhead during our experiments was less than 1 Kbps for groups of size 100.

Keyphrases

scalable application layer multicast    control traffic    different data delivery tree    desirable property    different site    averagegroup member    low-latency path    similar endto-end latency    wide-area testbed    large receiver set    link stress    narada application-layer multicast protocol    application-layer multicast peer    hierarchical clustering    present extensive simulation    internet-like topology    maximum packet loss rate    similar failure recovery property    multicast group    new scalable application-layer multicast protocol    32-100 member group    average control overhead   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University