• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Adaptive Limited-Supply Online Auctions (2004)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www-math.mit.edu]
  • [www.eecs.harvard.edu]
  • [www-2.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www-2.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cornell.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www-2.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de]
  • [www.cs.cmu.edu]
  • [www2.informatik.uni-freiburg.de]
  • [dimacs.rutgers.edu]
  • [dash.harvard.edu]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Mohammad T. Hajiaghayi , Robert Kleinberg , David C. Parkes
Venue:In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
Citations:96 - 24 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@INPROCEEDINGS{Hajiaghayi04adaptivelimited-supply,
    author = {Mohammad T. Hajiaghayi and Robert Kleinberg and David C. Parkes},
    title = {Adaptive Limited-Supply Online Auctions},
    booktitle = {In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce},
    year = {2004},
    pages = {71--80},
    publisher = {ACM Press}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

We study a limited-supply online auction problem, in which an auctioneer has k goods to sell and bidders arrive and depart dynamically. We suppose that agent valuations are drawn independently from some unknown distribution and construct an adaptive auction that is nevertheless value- and time-strategyproof. For the k = 1 problem we have a strategyproof variant on the classic secretary problem. We present a 4-competitive (e-competitive) strategyproof online algorithm with respect to offline Vickrey for revenue (efficiency) . We also show (in a model that slightly generalizes the assumption of independent valuations) that no mechanism can be better than 3/2-competitive (2-competitive) for revenue (efficiency). Our general approach considers a learning phase followed by an accepting phase, and is careful to handle incentive issues for agents that span the two phases. We extend to the k > 1 case, by deriving strategyproof mechanisms which are constant-competitive for revenue and efficiency. Finally, we present some strategyproof competitive algorithms for the case in which adversary uses a distribution known to the mechanism.

Keyphrases

adaptive limited-supply online auction    accepting phase    strategyproof mechanism    agent valuation    unknown distribution    learning phase    independent valuation    adaptive auction    strategyproof variant    incentive issue    classic secretary problem    limited-supply online auction problem    online algorithm    general approach    nevertheless value    strategyproof competitive algorithm   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University