• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

DMCA

Promoting the Use of End-to-End Congestion Control in the Internet (1999)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cdt.luth.se]
  • [www.cse.ucsc.edu]
  • [www-cse.ucsd.edu]
  • [www.cs.ucsd.edu]
  • [www.aciri.org]
  • [www.icir.org]
  • [cseweb.ucsd.edu]
  • [cseweb.ucsd.edu]
  • [cseweb.ucsd.edu]
  • [www.cs.uccs.edu]
  • [www.cs.uccs.edu]
  • [www.aciri.org]
  • [speed.cis.nctu.edu.tw]
  • [speed.cis.nctu.edu.tw]
  • [www.eecis.udel.edu]
  • [www.eecis.udel.edu]
  • [speed.cis.nctu.edu.tw]
  • [ftp.ee.lbl.gov]
  • [www.aciri.org]
  • [www.aciri.org]
  • [www.icir.org]
  • [ftp.riken.go.jp]
  • [ftp.riken.jp]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Sally Floyd , Kevin Fall
Venue:IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING
Citations:874 - 14 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{Floyd99promotingthe,
    author = {Sally Floyd and Kevin Fall},
    title = {Promoting the Use of End-to-End Congestion Control in the Internet},
    journal = {IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING},
    year = {1999},
    volume = {7},
    number = {4},
    pages = {458--472}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

This paper considers the potentially negative impacts of an increasing deployment of non-congestion-controlled best-effort traffic on the Internet.’ These negative impacts range from extreme unfairness against competing TCP traffic to the potential for congestion collapse. To promote the inclusion of end-to-end congestion control in the design of future protocols using best-effort traffic, we argue that router mechanisms are needed to identify and restrict the bandwidth of selected high-bandwidth best-effort flows in times of congestion. The paper discusses several general approaches for identifying those flows suitable for bandwidth regulation. These approaches are to identify a high-bandwidth flow in times of congestion as unresponsive, “not TCP-friendly,” or simply using disproportionate bandwidth. A flow that is not “TCP-friendly ” is one whose long-term arrival rate exceeds that of any conformant TCP in the same circumstances. An unresponsive flow is one failing to reduce its offered load at a router in response to an increased packet drop rate, and a disproportionate-bandwidth flow is one that uses considerably more bandwidth than other flows in a time of congestion.

Keyphrases

end-to-end congestion control    negative impact    router mechanism    bandwidth regulation    high-bandwidth best-effort flow    several general approach    non-congestion-controlled best-effort traffic    high-bandwidth flow    unresponsive flow    long-term arrival rate    disproportionate bandwidth    future protocol    conformant tcp    disproportionate-bandwidth flow    tcp traffic    packet drop rate    extreme unfairness    congestion collapse    best-effort traffic   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University