• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Recommended Citation (2014)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [uknowledge.uky.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]
  • [surface.syr.edu]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Dissertations All Surface , Nicholas J. Armstrong
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Surface14recommendedcitation,
    author = {Dissertations All Surface and Nicholas J. Armstrong},
    title = {Recommended Citation},
    year = {2014}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

This dissertation is an in-depth case study of NATO advisors and their perceived influence in Afghanistan (2009-2012). It explores the two-part question, how do foreign security actors (ministerial advisors and security force trainers, advisors, and commanders) attempt to influence their host-nation partners and what are their perceptions of these approaches on changes in local capacity, values, and security governance norms? I argue that security sector reform (SSR) programs in fragile states lack an explicit theory of change that specifies how reform occurs. From this view, I theorize internationally led SSR as “guided institutional transfer, ” grounded in rationalist and social constructivist explanations of convergence, diffusion, and socialization processes. Responding to calls for greater depth and emphasis on interactions and institutional change in SSR research, I examine NATO’s efforts in Afghanistan as an extreme case of SSR in which external-internal interactions were the highest. A stratified, purposive sample of 68 military and civilian elites (24 ministerial advisors, 27 embedded field advisors and commanders, and 17 experts and external observers) participated in a confidential, semi-structured interview.

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University