• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

DMCA

Computing communities in large networks using random walks (2004)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.liafa.jussieu.fr]
  • [arxiv.org]
  • [arxiv.org]
  • [arxiv.org]
  • [arxiv.org]
  • [www.emis.de]
  • [www.cs.brown.edu]
  • [www.emis.math.ca]
  • [jgaa.info]
  • [emis.maths.tcd.ie]
  • [emis.maths.adelaide.edu.au]
  • [emis.u-strasbg.fr]
  • [emis.library.cornell.edu]
  • [www.univie.ac.at]
  • [www.emis.ams.org]
  • [www.math.ethz.ch]
  • [www.maths.soton.ac.uk]
  • [www.maths.tcd.ie]
  • [www.mat.ub.es]
  • [www.mat.ub.edu]
  • [www.liafa.jussieu.fr]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Pascal Pons , Matthieu Latapy
Venue:J. of Graph Alg. and App. bf
Citations:226 - 3 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{Pons04computingcommunities,
    author = {Pascal Pons and Matthieu Latapy},
    title = {Computing communities in large networks using random walks},
    journal = {J. of Graph Alg. and App. bf},
    year = {2004},
    volume = {10},
    pages = {284--293}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Dense subgraphs of sparse graphs (communities), which appear in most real-world complex networks, play an important role in many contexts. Computing them however is generally expensive. We propose here a measure of similarities between vertices based on random walks which has several important advantages: it captures well the community structure in a network, it can be computed efficiently, and it can be used in an agglomerative algorithm to compute efficiently the community structure of a network. We propose such an algorithm, called Walktrap, which runs in time O(mn 2) and space O(n 2) in the worst case, and in time O(n 2 log n) and space O(n 2) in most real-world cases (n and m are respectively the number of vertices and edges in the input graph). Extensive comparison tests show that our algorithm surpasses previously proposed ones concerning the quality of the obtained community structures and that it stands among the best ones concerning the running time.

Keyphrases

random walk    large network    community structure    important role    real-world complex network    several important advantage    sparse graph    many context    real-world case    dense subgraphs    running time    input graph    extensive comparison test    agglomerative algorithm   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University