Results 1  10
of
34
Arithmetic Circuits: A Chasm at Depth Four
, 2008
"... We show that proving exponential lower bounds on depth four arithmetic circuits imply exponential lower bounds for unrestricted depth arithmetic circuits. In other words, for exponential sized circuits additional depth beyond four does not help. We then show that a complete blackbox derandomization ..."
Abstract

Cited by 71 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We show that proving exponential lower bounds on depth four arithmetic circuits imply exponential lower bounds for unrestricted depth arithmetic circuits. In other words, for exponential sized circuits additional depth beyond four does not help. We then show that a complete blackbox derandomization of Identity Testing problem for depth four circuits with multiplication gates of small fanin implies a nearly complete derandomization of general Identity Testing. 1
Arithmetic Circuits: a survey of recent results and open questions
"... A large class of problems in symbolic computation can be expressed as the task of computing some polynomials; and arithmetic circuits form the most standard model for studying the complexity of such computations. This algebraic model of computation attracted a large amount of research in the last fi ..."
Abstract

Cited by 65 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A large class of problems in symbolic computation can be expressed as the task of computing some polynomials; and arithmetic circuits form the most standard model for studying the complexity of such computations. This algebraic model of computation attracted a large amount of research in the last five decades, partially due to its simplicity and elegance. Being a more structured model than Boolean circuits, one could hope that the fundamental problems of theoretical computer science, such as separating P from NP, will be easier to solve for arithmetic circuits. However, in spite of the appearing simplicity and the vast amount of mathematical tools available, no major breakthrough has been seen. In fact, all the fundamental questions are still open for this model as well. Nevertheless, there has been a lot of progress in the area and beautiful results have been found, some in the last few years. As examples we mention the connection between polynomial identity testing and lower bounds of Kabanets and Impagliazzo, the lower bounds of Raz for multilinear formulas, and two new approaches for proving lower bounds: Geometric Complexity Theory and Elusive Functions. The goal of this monograph is to survey the field of arithmetic circuit complexity, focusing mainly on what we find to be the most interesting and accessible research directions. We aim to cover the main results and techniques, with an emphasis on works from the last two decades. In particular, we
An Almost Optimal Rank Bound for Depth3 Identities
"... Abstract—We show that the rank of a depth3 circuit (over any field) that is simple, minimal and zero is at most O(k 3 log d). The previous best rank bound known was 2 O(k2) (log d) k−2 by Dvir and Shpilka (STOC 2005). This almost resolves the rank question first posed by Dvir and Shpilka (as we als ..."
Abstract

Cited by 27 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract—We show that the rank of a depth3 circuit (over any field) that is simple, minimal and zero is at most O(k 3 log d). The previous best rank bound known was 2 O(k2) (log d) k−2 by Dvir and Shpilka (STOC 2005). This almost resolves the rank question first posed by Dvir and Shpilka (as we also provide a simple and minimal identity of rank Ω(k log d)). Our rank bound significantly improves (dependence on k exponentially reduced) the best known deterministic blackbox identity tests for depth3 circuits by Karnin and Shpilka (CCC 2008). Our techniques also shed light on the factorization pattern of nonzero depth3 circuits, most strikingly: the rank of linear factors of a simple, minimal and nonzero depth3 circuit (over any field) is at most O(k 3 log d). The novel feature of this work is a new notion of maps between sets of linear forms, called ideal matchings, used to study depth3 circuits. We prove interesting structural results about depth3 identities using these techniques. We believe that these can lead to the goal of a deterministic polynomial time identity test for these circuits. I.
FROM SYLVESTERGALLAI CONFIGURATIONS TO RANK BOUNDS: IMPROVED BLACKBOX IDENTITY TEST FOR DEPTH3 CIRCUITS
"... Abstract. We study the problem of identity testing for depth3 circuits of top fanin k and degree d (called ΣΠΣ(k, d) identities). We give a new structure theorem for such identities. A direct application of our theorem improves the known deterministic d kO(k) time blackbox identity test over ratio ..."
Abstract

Cited by 27 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. We study the problem of identity testing for depth3 circuits of top fanin k and degree d (called ΣΠΣ(k, d) identities). We give a new structure theorem for such identities. A direct application of our theorem improves the known deterministic d kO(k) time blackbox identity test over rationals (Kayal & Saraf, FOCS 2009) to one that takes d O(k2)time. Our structure theorem essentially says that the number of independent variables in a real depth3 identity is very small. This theorem settles affirmatively the stronger rank conjectures posed by Dvir & Shpilka (STOC 2005) and Kayal & Saraf (FOCS 2009). Our techniques provide a unified framework that actually beats all known rank bounds and hence gives the best running time (for every field) for blackbox identity tests. Our main theorem (almost optimally) pins down the relation between higher dimensional SylvesterGallai theorems and the rank of depth3 identities in a very transparent manner. The existence of this was hinted at by Dvir & Shpilka (STOC 2005), but first proven, for reals, by Kayal & Saraf (FOCS 2009). We introduce the concept of SylvesterGallai rank bounds for any field, and show the intimate connection between this and depth3 identity rank bounds. We also prove the first ever theorem about high dimensional SylvesterGallai configurations over any field. Our proofs and techniques are very different from previous results and devise a very interesting ensemble of combinatorics and algebra. The latter concepts are ideal theoretic and involve a new Chinese remainder theorem. Our proof methods explain the structure of any depth3 identity C: there is a nucleus of C that forms a low rank identity, while the remainder is a high dimensional SylvesterGallai configuration. 1.
Readonce Polynomial Identity Testing
"... An arithmetic readonce formula (ROF for short) is a formula (a circuit in which the fanout of every gate is at most 1) in which the operations are {+, ×} and such that every input variable labels at most one leaf. In this paper we study the problems of identity testing and reconstruction of readon ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
An arithmetic readonce formula (ROF for short) is a formula (a circuit in which the fanout of every gate is at most 1) in which the operations are {+, ×} and such that every input variable labels at most one leaf. In this paper we study the problems of identity testing and reconstruction of readonce formulas. the following are some of the results that we obtain. 1. Given k ROFs in n variables, over a field F, we give a deterministic (non blackbox) algorithm that checks whether they sum to zero or not. The running time of the algorithm is n O(k2). 2. We give an n O(d+k2) time deterministic algorithm for checking whether a black box holding the sum of k depth d ROFs in n variables computes the zero polynomial. In other words, we provide a hitting set of size n O(d+k2) for the sum of k depth d ROFs. If F  is too small then we make queries from a polynomial size extension field. This implies a deterministic algorithm that runs in time n O(d) for the reconstruction of depth d ROFs. 3. We give a hitting set of size exp ( Õ( √ n + k 2)) for the sum of k ROFs (without depth restrictions). In particular this implies a subexponential time deterministic algorithm for
Blackbox identity testing for bounded top fanin depth3 circuits: the field doesn’t matter
 In Proceedings of the 43rd annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC
, 2011
"... Abstract. Let C be a depth3 circuit with n variables, degree d and top fanin k (called ΣΠΣ(k, d, n) circuits) over base field F. It is a major open problem to design a deterministic polynomial time blackbox algorithm that tests if C is identically zero. Klivans & Spielman (STOC 2001) observed ..."
Abstract

Cited by 20 (7 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Let C be a depth3 circuit with n variables, degree d and top fanin k (called ΣΠΣ(k, d, n) circuits) over base field F. It is a major open problem to design a deterministic polynomial time blackbox algorithm that tests if C is identically zero. Klivans & Spielman (STOC 2001) observed that the problem is open even when k is a constant. This case has been subjected to a serious study over the past few years, starting from the work of Dvir & Shpilka (STOC 2005). We give the first polynomial time blackbox algorithm for this problem. Our algorithm runs in time poly(n)dk, regardless of the base field. The only field for which polynomial time algorithms were previously known is F = Q (Kayal & Saraf, FOCS 2009, and Saxena & Seshadhri, FOCS 2010). This is the first blackbox algorithm for depth3 circuits that does not use the rank based approaches of Karnin & Shpilka (CCC 2008). We prove an important tool for the study of depth3 identities. We design a blackbox polynomial time transformation that reduces the number of variables in a ΣΠΣ(k, d, n) circuit to k variables, but preserves the identity structure. Key words. depth3 circuits; polynomial identity testing; derandomization; blackbox; Chinese remaindering; algebra homomorphism
Progress on Polynomial Identity Testing
"... Polynomial identity testing (PIT) is the problem of checking whether a given arithmetic circuit is the zero circuit. PIT ranks as one of the most important open problems in the intersection of algebra and computational complexity. In the last few years, there has been an impressive progress on this ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Polynomial identity testing (PIT) is the problem of checking whether a given arithmetic circuit is the zero circuit. PIT ranks as one of the most important open problems in the intersection of algebra and computational complexity. In the last few years, there has been an impressive progress on this problem but a complete solution might take a while. In this article we give a soft survey exhibiting the ideas that have been useful. 1
Deterministic identity testing of depth 4 multilinear circuits with bounded top fanin
, 2009
"... ..."
Quasipolynomial hittingset for setdepth formulas
 In STOC
, 2013
"... Abstract. We call a depth4 formula C setdepth4 if there exists a (unknown) partition X1 unionsq · · · unionsq Xd of the variable indices [n] that the top product layer respects, i.e. C(x) = ∑k i=1 ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. We call a depth4 formula C setdepth4 if there exists a (unknown) partition X1 unionsq · · · unionsq Xd of the variable indices [n] that the top product layer respects, i.e. C(x) = ∑k i=1
Blackbox identity testing of depth4 multilinear circuits
 In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC
, 2011
"... We study the problem of identity testing for multilinear ΣΠΣΠ(k) circuits, i.e. multilinear depth4 circuits with fanin k at the top + gate. We give the first polynomialtime deterministic identity testing algorithm for such circuits. Our results also hold in the blackbox setting. The running time ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study the problem of identity testing for multilinear ΣΠΣΠ(k) circuits, i.e. multilinear depth4 circuits with fanin k at the top + gate. We give the first polynomialtime deterministic identity testing algorithm for such circuits. Our results also hold in the blackbox setting. The running time of our algorithm is (ns)O(k 3), where n is the number of variables, s is the size of the circuit and k is the fanin of the top gate. The importance of this model arises from [AV08], where it was shown that derandomizing blackbox polynomial identity testing for general depth4 circuits implies a derandomization of polynomial identity testing (PIT) for general arithmetic circuits. Prior to our work, the best PIT algorithm for multilinear ΣΠΣΠ(k) circuits [KMSV10] ran in quasipolynomialtime, with the running time being nO(k 6 log(k) log2 s). We obtain our results by showing a strong structural result for multilinear ΣΠΣΠ(k) circuits that compute the zero polynomial. We show that under some mild technical conditions, any gate of such a circuit must compute a sparse polynomial. We then show how to combine the structure theorem with a result by Klivans and Spielman [KS01], on the identity testing for sparse polynomials, to yield the full result.