Results 1 - 10
of
54
Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
- Social, Cognitive, and Affective Neuroscience,
, 2007
"... Recent fMRI evidence has detected increased medial prefrontal activation during contemplation of personal moral dilemmas compared to impersonal ones, which suggests that this cortical region plays a role in personal moral judgment. However, functional imaging results cannot definitively establish t ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 44 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Recent fMRI evidence has detected increased medial prefrontal activation during contemplation of personal moral dilemmas compared to impersonal ones, which suggests that this cortical region plays a role in personal moral judgment. However, functional imaging results cannot definitively establish that a brain area is necessary for a particular cognitive process. This requires evidence from lesion techniques, such as studies of human patients with focal brain damage. Here, we tested 7 patients with lesions in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and 12 healthy individuals in personal moral dilemmas, impersonal moral dilemmas and non-moral dilemmas. Compared to normal controls, patients were more willing to judge personal moral violations as acceptable behaviors in personal moral dilemmas, and they did so more quickly. In contrast, their performance in impersonal and non-moral dilemmas was comparable to that of controls. These results indicate that the ventromedial prefrontal cortex is necessary to oppose personal moral violations, possibly by mediating anticipatory, self-focused, emotional reactions that may exert strong influence on moral choice and behavior.
Individual decisions under risk, risk sharing, and asset prices with regret,working paper
, 2006
"... We consider an Arrow-Debreu economy in which expected-utility-maximizing agents are sensitive to regret. According to regret theory, the marginal utility of their consumption is increasing in the maximum payoff that they could have obtained if they would have made another choice ex ante. We show tha ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 13 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We consider an Arrow-Debreu economy in which expected-utility-maximizing agents are sensitive to regret. According to regret theory, the marginal utility of their consumption is increasing in the maximum payoff that they could have obtained if they would have made another choice ex ante. We show that regret biases the optimal portfolio allocation towards assets that perform particularly well in low probability states. The competitive asset pricing kernel is convexified by regret if the distribution of the macroeconomic risk is logconcave. Regret also reduces the equity premium when the macro risk is positively skewed. We characterize the competitive allocation of risk when consumers have heterogenous preferences, and we show how to aggregate individual intensities of regret.
Neural responses to sanction threats in two-party economic exchange.PNAS
, 2009
"... McClure for helpful discussions, C. Bracero & J. McGee for fMRI images collection. Detailed comments from two anonymous referees substantially improved this paper. Competing interests statement The authors declare no competing interests. Sanctions are used ubiquitously to enforce obedience to so ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 12 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
McClure for helpful discussions, C. Bracero & J. McGee for fMRI images collection. Detailed comments from two anonymous referees substantially improved this paper. Competing interests statement The authors declare no competing interests. Sanctions are used ubiquitously to enforce obedience to social norms. Recent field studies and laboratory experiments have demonstrated, however, that cooperation is sometimes reduced when incentives meant to promote pro-social decisions are added to the environment. Although a variety of explanations have been suggested, the neural foundations of this effect have not been fully explored. Using a modified trust game, we find trustees reciprocate relatively less when facing sanction threats, and the presence of sanctions significantly reduces trustee’s brain activities involved in social reward valuation (VMPFC, LOFC, and Amygdala), while
Decision neuroscience: neuroeconomics”.
- WIREs Cognitive Science
, 2010
"... Few aspects of human cognition are more personal than the choices we make. Our decisions-from the mundane to the impossibly complex-continually shape the courses of our lives. In recent years, researchers have applied the tools of neuroscience to understand the mechanisms that underlie decision mak ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 7 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Few aspects of human cognition are more personal than the choices we make. Our decisions-from the mundane to the impossibly complex-continually shape the courses of our lives. In recent years, researchers have applied the tools of neuroscience to understand the mechanisms that underlie decision making, as part of the new discipline of decision neuroscience. A primary goal of this emerging field has been to identify the processes that underlie specific decision variables, including the value of rewards, the uncertainty associated with particular outcomes, and the consequences of social interactions. Recent work suggests potential neural substrates that integrate these variables, potentially reflecting a common neural currency for value, to facilitate value comparisons. Despite the successes of decision neuroscience research for elucidating brain mechanisms, significant challenges remain. These include building new conceptual frameworks for decision making, integrating research findings across disparate techniques and species, and extending results from neuroscience to shape economic theory. To overcome these challenges, future research will likely focus on interpersonal variability in decision making, with the eventual goal of creating biologically plausible models for individual choice.
Prefrontal cortex damage abolishes brand-cued changes in cola preference
- Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience
, 2008
"... cola preference ..."
(Show Context)
The regret and disappointment scale: An instrument for assessing regret and disappointment in decision making
- Judgment and Decision Making
, 2008
"... The present article investigates the effectiveness of methods traditionally used to distinguish between the emotions of regret and disappointment and presents a new method — the Regret and Disappointment Scale (RDS) — for assessing the two emotions in decision making research. The validity of the R ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 4 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The present article investigates the effectiveness of methods traditionally used to distinguish between the emotions of regret and disappointment and presents a new method — the Regret and Disappointment Scale (RDS) — for assessing the two emotions in decision making research. The validity of the RDS was tested in three studies. Study 1 used two scenarios, one prototypical of regret and the other of disappointment, to test and compare traditional methods (“How much regret do you feel ” and “How much disappointment do you feel”) with the RDS. Results showed that only the RDS clearly differentiated between the constructs of regret and disappointment. Study 2 confirmed the validity of the RDS in a real-life scenario, in which both feelings of regret and disappointment could be experienced. Study 2 also demonstrated that the RDS can discriminate between regret and disappointment with results similar to those obtained by using a context-specific scale. Study 3 showed the advantages of the RDS over the traditional methods in gambling situations commonly used in decision making research, and provided evidence for the convergent validity of the RDS.
Adolescents‟ Heightened RiskSeeking in a Probabilistic Gambling Task.” Cognitive Development
, 2010
"... Abstract This study investigated adolescent males' decision-making under risk, and the emotional response to decision outcomes, using a probabilistic gambling task designed to evoke counterfactually mediated emotions (relief and regret). Participants were 20 adolescents (aged 9-11), 26 young a ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 3 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract This study investigated adolescent males' decision-making under risk, and the emotional response to decision outcomes, using a probabilistic gambling task designed to evoke counterfactually mediated emotions (relief and regret). Participants were 20 adolescents (aged 9-11), 26 young adolescents (aged 12-15), 20 mid-adolescents (aged 15-18) and 17 adults (aged 25-35). All were male. The ability to maximize expected value improved with age. However, there was an inverted U-shaped developmental pattern for risk-seeking. The age at which risktaking was highest was 14.38 years. Although emotion ratings overall did not differ across age, there was an increase between childhood and young adolescence in the strength of counterfactually mediated emotions (relief and regret) reported after receiving feedback about the gamble outcome. We suggest that continuing development of the emotional response to outcomes may be a factor contributing to adolescents' risky behaviour.
Physiological and behavioral signatures of reflective exploratory choice
"... Abstract Physiological arousal, a marker of emotional re-sponse, has been demonstrated to accompany human decision making under uncertainty. Anticipatory emotions have been portrayed as basic and rapid evaluations of chosen actions. Instead, could these arousal signals stem from a “cognitive” assess ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract Physiological arousal, a marker of emotional re-sponse, has been demonstrated to accompany human decision making under uncertainty. Anticipatory emotions have been portrayed as basic and rapid evaluations of chosen actions. Instead, could these arousal signals stem from a “cognitive” assessment of value that utilizes the full environment structure, as opposed to merely signaling a coarse, reflexive assessment of the possible consequences of choices? Combining an explora-tion–exploitation task, computational modeling, and skin con-ductance measurements, we find that physiological arousal manifests a reflective assessment of the benefit of the chosen action, mirroring observed behavior. Consistent with the level of computational sophistication evident in these signals, a follow-up experiment demonstrates that anticipatory arousal is modu-lated by current environment volatility, in accordance with the predictions of our computational account. Finally, we examine the cognitive costs of the exploratory choice behavior these arousal signals accompany by manipulating concurrent cogni-tive demand. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the arousal that accompanies choice under uncertainty arises from a more reflective and “cognitive ” assessment of the chosen ac-tion’s consequences than has been revealed previously.
Physical Review A
, 2001
"... The selective orexin receptor 1 antagonist ACT-335827 in a rat model of diet-induced obesity associated with metabolic syndrome ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The selective orexin receptor 1 antagonist ACT-335827 in a rat model of diet-induced obesity associated with metabolic syndrome
Unpacking the neural associations of emotion and judgment in emotion-congruent judgment
"... The current study takes a new approach to understand the neural systems that support emotion-congruent judgment. The bulk of previous neural research has inferred emotional influences on judgment from disadvantageous judgments or non-random individual differences. The current study manipulated the i ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
The current study takes a new approach to understand the neural systems that support emotion-congruent judgment. The bulk of previous neural research has inferred emotional influences on judgment from disadvantageous judgments or non-random individual differences. The current study manipulated the influence of emotional information on judgments of stimuli that were equivocally composed of positive and negative attributes. Emotion-congruent processing was operationalized in two ways: neural activation significantly associated with primes that lead to emotionally congruent judgments and neural activation significantly associated with judgments that were preceded by emotionally congruent primes. Distinct regions of medial orbitofrontal cortex were associated with these patterns of emotion-congruent processing. Judgments that were incongruent with preceding primes were associated with dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and lateral orbitofrontal cortex activity. The current study demonstrates a new approach to investigate the neural systems associated with emotion-congruent judgment. The findings suggest that medial OFC may support attentional processes that underlie emotion-congruent judgment.