• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, (2008)

by C Rosé
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 10 of 63
Next 10 →

Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art

by Oliver Scheuer, Frank Loll, Niels Pinkwart, Bruce M. McLaren - COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING , 2010
"... Argumentation is an important skill to learn. It is valuable not only in many professional contexts, such as the law, science, politics, and business, but also in everyday life. However, not many people are good arguers. In response to this, researchers and practitioners over the past 15–20 years h ..."
Abstract - Cited by 46 (16 self) - Add to MetaCart
Argumentation is an important skill to learn. It is valuable not only in many professional contexts, such as the law, science, politics, and business, but also in everyday life. However, not many people are good arguers. In response to this, researchers and practitioners over the past 15–20 years have developed software tools both to support and teach argumentation. Some of these tools are used in individual fashion, to present students with the “rules ” of argumentation in a particular domain and give them an opportunity to practice, while other tools are used in collaborative fashion, to facilitate communication and argumentation between multiple, and perhaps distant, participants. In this paper, we review the extensive literature on argumentation systems, both individual and collaborative, and both supportive and educational, with an eye toward particular aspects of the past work. More specifically, we review the types of argument representations that have been used, the various types of interaction design and ontologies that have been employed, and the system architecture issues that have been addressed. In addition, we discuss intelligent and automated features that have been imbued in past systems, such as automatically analyzing the quality of arguments and providing intelligent feedback to support and/or tutor

Semi-supervised Speech Act Recognition in Emails and Forums

by Minwoo Jeong, Chin-yew Lin, Gary Geunbae Lee
"... In this paper, we present a semi-supervised method for automatic speech act recognition in email and forums. The major challenge of this task is due to lack of labeled data in these two genres. Our method leverages labeled data in the Switchboard-DAMSL and the Meeting Recorder Dialog Act database an ..."
Abstract - Cited by 17 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we present a semi-supervised method for automatic speech act recognition in email and forums. The major challenge of this task is due to lack of labeled data in these two genres. Our method leverages labeled data in the Switchboard-DAMSL and the Meeting Recorder Dialog Act database and applies simple domain adaptation techniques over a large amount of unlabeled email and forum data to address this problem. Our method uses automatically extracted features such as phrases and dependency trees, called subtree features, for semi-supervised learning. Empirical results demonstrate that our model is effective in email and forum speech act recognition. 1
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...ations. Analysis of speech acts for online chat and instant messages and have been studied in computer-mediated communication (CMC) and distance learning (Twitchell et al., 2004; Nastri et al., 2006; =-=Rosé et al., 2008-=-). In natural language processing, Cohen et al. (2004) and Feng et al. (2006) used speech acts to capture the intentional focus of emails and discussion boards. However, they assume that enough labele...

Engaging Collaborative Learners with Helping Agents

by Sourish Chaudhuri, Rohit Kumar, Iris Howley, Carolyn Penstein Rosé
"... Abstract. We present the results of a study in which we contrast alternative forms of collaborative learning support in the midst of a collaborative design task in which students negotiate between increasing power and increasing environmental friendliness. Our research question is whether interactiv ..."
Abstract - Cited by 15 (6 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We present the results of a study in which we contrast alternative forms of collaborative learning support in the midst of a collaborative design task in which students negotiate between increasing power and increasing environmental friendliness. Our research question is whether interactive instructional support in collaborative learning environments is more effective when it is offered as solicited or unsolicited help. The finding from our classroom study is that dialogue-based support is more effective in this collaborative context when invitations for help in the form of pointer hints are offered automatically, but dialogue agents are only provided when the invitation is explicitly accepted.

Superposter behavior in MOOC forums

by Jonathan Huang, Anirban Dasgupta, Arpita Ghosh, Jane Manning, Marc Sanders - In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference , 2014
"... Discussion forums, employed by MOOC providers as the pri-mary mode of interaction among instructors and students, have emerged as one of the important components of on-line courses. We empirically study contribution behavior in these online collaborative learning forums using data from 44 MOOCs host ..."
Abstract - Cited by 12 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Discussion forums, employed by MOOC providers as the pri-mary mode of interaction among instructors and students, have emerged as one of the important components of on-line courses. We empirically study contribution behavior in these online collaborative learning forums using data from 44 MOOCs hosted on Coursera, focusing primarily on the highest-volume contributors—“superposters”—in a forum. We explore who these superposters are and study their en-gagement patterns across the MOOC platform, with a focus on the following question—to what extent is superposting a positive phenomenon for the forum? Specifically, while su-perposters clearly contribute heavily to the forum in terms of quantity, how do these contributions rate in terms of quality, and does this prolific posting behavior negatively impact con-tribution from the large remainder of students in the class? We analyze these questions across the courses in our dataset, and find that superposters display above-average engagement across Coursera, enrolling in more courses and obtaining bet-ter grades than the average forum participant; additionally, students who are superposters in one course are significantly more likely to be superposters in other courses they take. In terms of utility, our analysis indicates that while being nei-ther the fastest nor the most upvoted, superposters ’ responses are speedier and receive more upvotes than the average fo-rum user’s posts; a manual assessment of quality on a sub-set of this content supports this conclusion that a large frac-tion of superposter contributions indeed constitute useful con-tent. Finally, we find that superposters ’ prolific contribution behavior does not ‘drown out the silent majority’—high su-perposter activity correlates positively and significantly with higher overall activity and forum health, as measured by total contribution volume, higher average perceived utility in terms of received votes, and a smaller fraction of orphaned threads. Author Keywords massive open online course; MOOC; education; Coursera;
(Show Context)

Citation Context

... most content analyses in the CSCL literature have relied on manually coded data as in our own paper [5], it seems clear that automated natural language processing methods (such as those described in =-=[12]-=-) will be more scalable for future analyses. 5i.e., threads which receive no responses 2 would not be able to do alone, collaborative environments effectively form a scaffolding [20] for learners to p...

Helping Teachers Handle the Flood of Data in Online Student Discussions

by Oliver Scheuer, Bruce M. Mclaren - THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS , 2008
"... E-discussion tools provide students with the opportunity not only to learn about the topic under discussion but to acquire argumentation and collaboration skills and to engage in analytic thinking. However, too often, ediscussions are not fruitful and moderation is needed. We describe our approach, ..."
Abstract - Cited by 11 (5 self) - Add to MetaCart
E-discussion tools provide students with the opportunity not only to learn about the topic under discussion but to acquire argumentation and collaboration skills and to engage in analytic thinking. However, too often, ediscussions are not fruitful and moderation is needed. We describe our approach, which employs intelligent data analysis techniques, to support teachers as they moderate multiple simultaneous discussions. We have generated six machine-learned classifiers for detecting potentially important discussion characteristics, such as a “reasoned claim” and an “argument-counterargument” sequence. All of our classifiers have achieved satisfactory Kappa values and are integrated in an online classification system. We hypothesize how a teacher might use this information by means of two authentic e-discussion examples. Finally, we discuss ways to bootstrap from these fine-grained classifications to the analysis of more complex patterns of interaction.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

... the Deep Loop classifiers to identify good and bad discussion situations. 2 Related Work The most relevant work to ours is by Rosé and colleagues, who have developed the text analysis tool TagHelper =-=[3]-=-, also used in our work. Originally, they aimed at freeing corpus analysts from the tedious task of manually coding large amounts of data, rather than analyzing online discussions, which is our goal. ...

How Online Small Groups Co-construct Mathematical Artifacts to do . . .

by Murat Perit Çakır , 2009
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 11 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

What's in a Cluster? Automatically Detecting Interesting Interactions in Student EDiscussion," in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

by Bruce M. Mclaren, Jan Miksatko, Bruce M. Mclaren - Lecture Notes in Computer Science , 2008
"... accepted for inclusion in Human-Computer Interaction Institute by an authorized administrator of Research Showcase @ CMU. For more information, please contact ..."
Abstract - Cited by 9 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
accepted for inclusion in Human-Computer Interaction Institute by an authorized administrator of Research Showcase @ CMU. For more information, please contact
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...sresults.sRelated WorksAnalyzing student contributions and assigning labels is common practice in designingsand experimenting with intelligent educational technology. For instance, the researchers in =-=[6]-=- investigated machine-learning approaches by training classifiers on the language of a large corpus of labeled data and classifying single contributions into categories. These results led to the devel...

Automated analysis and feedback techniques to support argumentation: a survey

by Oliver Scheuer, Bruce M. Mclaren, Frank Loll, Niels Pinkwart - In , 2010
"... Abstract: Argumentation is one of the key competencies in our private and professional lives. However, many people struggle to produce, interpret and evaluate arguments in a systematic and rational fashion. To remedy this situation, a number of computer-based argumentation systems have been develope ..."
Abstract - Cited by 6 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract: Argumentation is one of the key competencies in our private and professional lives. However, many people struggle to produce, interpret and evaluate arguments in a systematic and rational fashion. To remedy this situation, a number of computer-based argumentation systems have been developed over the past decades to support or teach argumentation. The use of artificial intelligence techniques holds promise to increase the effectiveness of such systems by automatically analyzing user actions and providing supportive feedback. In this chapter, we review and systemize argumentation analysis approaches with a special focus on the educational uses. We also discuss argument modeling and discussion systems including their analysis approaches, feedback strategies and architectures.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...opulation does not necessarily work well with another population because the use of software and language might differ. Our final issue concerns the unit of analysis. Two of the presented approaches (=-=Rosé et al., 2008-=-; Verbree et al., 2006) rely on pre-segmented data that does not correspond to natural delimitations such as sentence or message boundaries. For instance, each message might contain several “epistemic...

Assessment of (Computer-Supported) Collaborative Learning

by J. W. Strijbos , 2012
"... This is a post-print of an article submitted for consideration in the IEEE Transactions on Learning ..."
Abstract - Cited by 5 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
This is a post-print of an article submitted for consideration in the IEEE Transactions on Learning
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...ators [117], latent growth curves [150], dynamic multilevel analysis [151], event-centred analysis [119]), and uptake contingency graphs [116]. Finally, recent developments in automated coding [152], =-=[153]-=- offer directions for natural language processing applications for CL monitoring and assessment. CL-display 1. Awareness displays. Research on awareness orginated in the area of Computer-Supported Coo...

Towards an Agile Approach to Adapting Dynamic Collaboration Support to Student Needs,

by David Adamson , Gregory Dyke , Hyeju Jang , Carolyn Penstein Rosé - International Journal of AI in Education , 2014
"... Abstract. This paper investigates the use of conversational agents to scaffold on-line collaborative learning discussions through an approach called Academically Productive Talk (APT). In contrast to past work on dynamic support for collaborative learning, where agents were used to elevate conceptu ..."
Abstract - Cited by 5 (4 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper investigates the use of conversational agents to scaffold on-line collaborative learning discussions through an approach called Academically Productive Talk (APT). In contrast to past work on dynamic support for collaborative learning, where agents were used to elevate conceptual depth by leading students through directed lines of reasoning
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...enbourg, 2002), where the application of inappropriate or unneeded supports have a detrimental effect on collaboration and learning. Dynamic Script-Based Support with Conversational Agents The early non-adaptive scripting approaches described above can sometimes result in both overscripting and in interference between multiple scripts (Weinberger et al., 2007), both of which have been shown to be detrimental to student performance. More dynamic approaches can trigger scripted support in response to the automatic analysis of participant activity (Soller & Lesgold, 2000; Erkens & Janssen, 2008; Rosé et al., 2008; McLaren et al., 2007; Mu et al., 2012). This sort of analysis can occur at a macro-level, following the state of the activity as a whole, or it can be based on the microlevel classification of individual user contributions. Some prior work on adaptive support for collaborative learning used hint-based support for individual learning with technology to support peer tutoring interactions (Diziol et al., 2010). Other prior work on dynamic conversational agent based support built on a long history of work using tutorial dialogue agents to support individual learning with technology (Wiemer-Hasti...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University