Results 1 -
4 of
4
Is choice experiment becoming more popular than contingent valuation ? A systematic review in agriculture, environment and health Is choice experiment becoming more popular than contingent valuation? A systematic review in agriculture, environment and hea
"... Abstract: This paper provides a systematic review based on a large sample of articles published between 2004 and 2013 in economic journals and listed in ISI Web of Science. Results from descriptive statistics and regression models show that choice experiment (CE) is becoming more popular than conti ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract: This paper provides a systematic review based on a large sample of articles published between 2004 and 2013 in economic journals and listed in ISI Web of Science. Results from descriptive statistics and regression models show that choice experiment (CE) is becoming more popular than contingent valuation (CV) in terms of number of publications and citations. Also, journals related to health economics and agricultural economics are more CE oriented than journals related to environmental economics. Finally, divergences across economic journals are found when comparing recent CE articles in terms of questionnaire design, econometric procedure, administration of questionnaire and type of participants. In particular, it is more standard to allow for unobserved taste heterogeneity in environmental journals than in health or agricultural journals.
Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments
"... Background. The aims of this study were to assess patients' preferences to wait or start systemic treatment and understand how patients would make tradeoffs between certain severe adverse events (AEs) and additional months of progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods. Adults in Fr ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Background. The aims of this study were to assess patients' preferences to wait or start systemic treatment and understand how patients would make tradeoffs between certain severe adverse events (AEs) and additional months of progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods. Adults in France, Germany, and Spain with a diagnosis of DTC and who have had at least one RAI treatment completed a direct-elicitation question and a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) online. The direct-elicitation question asked respondents whether they would opt out of treatment when their tumor is RAI-R. In the DCE, respondents chose between 12 pairs of hypothetical RAI-R DTC treatment profiles. Profiles were defined by magnitudes of efficacy (PFS) and safety (severe hand-foot skin reaction [HFSR], severe proteinuria, and severe hypertension). A main-effects random-parameters logit model was estimated. Results. 134 patients completed the survey. Most patients (86.6%) opted for treatment rather than "wait and see" decision. Patients placed a greater weight on the risk of severe hypertension than the risk of proteinuria and HFSR. Conclusions. DTC patients showed preference toward treatment for RAI-R DTC over watchful waiting. Patients' concerns about the risk of severe hypertension appeared to have had a greater effect on patients' choice than severe proteinuria or HFSR.
FACTORS RELATED TO THE USE OF ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT (ART) IN PRE AND POST-PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY PROGRAMS AND IN PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY PRACTICES IN THE US
, 2012
"... Factors related to the use of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in pre and post-pediatric dentistry programs and in pediatric dentistry practices in the US ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Factors related to the use of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in pre and post-pediatric dentistry programs and in pediatric dentistry practices in the US
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.811324 Modeling Mental Health Information Preferences During the Early Adult Years: A Discrete Choice Conjoint Experiment
"... ISSN: 1081-0730 print/1087-0415 online ..."
(Show Context)