• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force,” Value in Health, (2011)

by J F P Bridges, A B Hauber, D Marshall
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 4 of 4

Is choice experiment becoming more popular than contingent valuation ? A systematic review in agriculture, environment and health Is choice experiment becoming more popular than contingent valuation? A systematic review in agriculture, environment and hea

by Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu , Henrik Andersson , Olivier Beaumais , Romain Crastes , -François-Charles Wolff , Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu , Henrik Andersson , Olivier Beaumais , Romain Crastes , François-Charles Wolff , Lisa
"... Abstract: This paper provides a systematic review based on a large sample of articles published between 2004 and 2013 in economic journals and listed in ISI Web of Science. Results from descriptive statistics and regression models show that choice experiment (CE) is becoming more popular than conti ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract: This paper provides a systematic review based on a large sample of articles published between 2004 and 2013 in economic journals and listed in ISI Web of Science. Results from descriptive statistics and regression models show that choice experiment (CE) is becoming more popular than contingent valuation (CV) in terms of number of publications and citations. Also, journals related to health economics and agricultural economics are more CE oriented than journals related to environmental economics. Finally, divergences across economic journals are found when comparing recent CE articles in terms of questionnaire design, econometric procedure, administration of questionnaire and type of participants. In particular, it is more standard to allow for unobserved taste heterogeneity in environmental journals than in health or agricultural journals.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...stable in journals related to health economics. Quotation of the most influential articles In Figure 4, we compare the most quoted CV and CE articles that were published in 2004 (CV: Alberini et al. 2004, CE: Lusk and Schroeder 2004), 2005 (CE: Bech and Gyrd-Hansen 2005, CV: Murphy et al. 2005), 2006 (CV: Bateman et al. 2006, CE: Birol et al. 2006), 2007 (CV: Carson and Groves 2007, CE: Ferrini and Scarpa 2007), 2008 (CV: Blumenschein et al. 2008, CE: Scarpa and Rose 2008), 2009 (CV: Richardson and Loomis 2009, CE: Scarpa et al. 2009), 2010 (CE: Hoyos 2010, CV: Nocella et al. 2010), 2011 (CE: Bridges et al. 2011, CV: Carson and Louviere 2011), 2012 (CV: Botzen and van den Bergh 2012, CE: Coast et al. 2012) and 2013 (CE: Greene and Hensher 2013, CV: Krishna et al. 2013). We also perform the same comparisons by only considering the journals related to agriculture, environment and health. Figure 4. Number of citations for the most frequently quoted CV and CE articles 0 50 100 150 Nb o f c ita tio ns 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 All the journals of our database 0 50 100 150 Nb o f c ita tio ns 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Environment 0 50 100 150 N b of c ita tio...

Patient Benefit-Risk Tradeoffs for Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Treatments

by Ateesha F Mohamed , Juan Marcos González , Angelyn Fairchild
"... Background. The aims of this study were to assess patients' preferences to wait or start systemic treatment and understand how patients would make tradeoffs between certain severe adverse events (AEs) and additional months of progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods. Adults in Fr ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Background. The aims of this study were to assess patients' preferences to wait or start systemic treatment and understand how patients would make tradeoffs between certain severe adverse events (AEs) and additional months of progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods. Adults in France, Germany, and Spain with a diagnosis of DTC and who have had at least one RAI treatment completed a direct-elicitation question and a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) online. The direct-elicitation question asked respondents whether they would opt out of treatment when their tumor is RAI-R. In the DCE, respondents chose between 12 pairs of hypothetical RAI-R DTC treatment profiles. Profiles were defined by magnitudes of efficacy (PFS) and safety (severe hand-foot skin reaction [HFSR], severe proteinuria, and severe hypertension). A main-effects random-parameters logit model was estimated. Results. 134 patients completed the survey. Most patients (86.6%) opted for treatment rather than "wait and see" decision. Patients placed a greater weight on the risk of severe hypertension than the risk of proteinuria and HFSR. Conclusions. DTC patients showed preference toward treatment for RAI-R DTC over watchful waiting. Patients' concerns about the risk of severe hypertension appeared to have had a greater effect on patients' choice than severe proteinuria or HFSR.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...patients. The aims of this study were to assess patients’ preferences to wait or start systemic treatment and to understand how patients would make tradeoffs between additional months of progression-free survival (PFS) and certain severe adverse events (AEs) that differ between the two approved systemic treatments.The hypothesis is that when choosing treatments, patients consider long-term AEs with uncertain sequelae to be more important than short-term AEs that could lead to a worsening quality of life. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Preference-Elicitation Questions. We followed good practice [18] in designing and administering a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) to elicit patient preferences for RAI-R DTC treatments. This method is grounded in both psychology [19] and economics [20] and has been commonly applied in health [21, 22]. Several DCE studies in oncology have evaluated patient treatment preferences using online surveys [23–26]. DCE studies require respondents to answer a series of choice questions where they indicate which of several hypothetical treatment alternatives they prefer. Treatment alternatives are defined by the levels to which they satisfy various treatment attribu...

FACTORS RELATED TO THE USE OF ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT (ART) IN PRE AND POST-PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY PROGRAMS AND IN PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY PRACTICES IN THE US

by Elham Talib Kateeb, Elham Talib Kateeb, An Abstract , 2012
"... Factors related to the use of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in pre and post-pediatric dentistry programs and in pediatric dentistry practices in the US ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Factors related to the use of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in pre and post-pediatric dentistry programs and in pediatric dentistry practices in the US

DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.811324 Modeling Mental Health Information Preferences During the Early Adult Years: A Discrete Choice Conjoint Experiment

by Charles E. Cunningham, John R. Walker, John D. Eastwood, Henny Westra, Heather Rimas, Yvonne Chen, Yvonne Chen, Madalyn Marcus, Richard P. Swinson, Keyna Bracken, Sarah Babcock, Jihae Lee, Alix Feldman
"... ISSN: 1081-0730 print/1087-0415 online ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
ISSN: 1081-0730 print/1087-0415 online
(Show Context)

Citation Context

... by each participant.sMental Health Information Preferences 419 information about anxiety or depression and to choose the approach they would prefer.sTo reduce noncompensatory simplifying tendencies (=-=Bridges et al., 2011-=-; Chinburapaset al., 1993; Glockner & Betsch, 2008), we used a design allowing attribute levels tosappear more than once in each choice task. To enhance attention, a pictorial researchsassistant appea...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University