• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Tensor principal component analysis via convex optimization (2012)

by B Jiang, S Ma, S Zhang
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 4 of 4

S.: Iteration bounds for finding -stationary points of structured nonconvex optimization. Working Paper

by Bo Jiang, Shuzhong Zhang , 2014
"... In this paper we study proximal conditional-gradient (CG) and proximal gradient-projection type algorithms for a block-structured constrained nonconvex optimization model, which arises naturally from tensor data analysis. First, we introduce a new notion of -stationarity, which is suitable for the s ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
In this paper we study proximal conditional-gradient (CG) and proximal gradient-projection type algorithms for a block-structured constrained nonconvex optimization model, which arises naturally from tensor data analysis. First, we introduce a new notion of -stationarity, which is suitable for the structured problem under consideration. We then propose two types of first-order algorithms for the model based on the proximal conditional-gradient (CG) method and the proximal gradient-projection method respectively. If the nonconvex objective function is in the form of mathematical expectation, we then discuss how to incorporate randomized sampling to avoid computing the expectations exactly. For the general block optimization model, the proximal subroutines are performed for each block according to either the block-coordinate-descent (BCD) or the maximum-block-improvement (MBI) updating rule. If the gradient of the nonconvex part of the objective f satisfies ‖∇f(x) − ∇f(y)‖q ≤ M‖x − y‖δp where δ = p/q with 1/p + 1/q = 1, then we prove that the new algorithms have an overall iteration complexity bound of O(1/q) in finding an -stationary solution. If f is concave then the iteration complexity reduces to O(1/). Our numerical experiments for tensor approximation problems show promising performances of the new solution algorithms.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...ter-product operation. This problem bears different names including the tensor best rank-one approximation [24] and the Z-eigenvalue problem [32, 27], and various solution methods have been proposed: =-=[6, 23, 24, 33]-=-. Like in the matrix case, sparsity is desirable in tensor decomposition under various environments [1]. Consider the following sparse tensor PCA problem: min ‖A − λx1 ⊗ x2 ⊗ · · · ⊗ xd‖22 + ρ d∑ i=1 ...

New Ranks for Even-Order Tensors and Their Applications in Low-Rank Tensor Optimization

by Bo Jiang, Shiqian Ma, Shuzhong Zhang , 2015
"... In this paper, we propose three new tensor decompositions for even-order tensors correspond-ing respectively to the rank-one decompositions of some unfolded matrices. Consequently such new decompositions lead to three new notions of (even-order) tensor ranks, to be called the M-rank, the symmetric M ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we propose three new tensor decompositions for even-order tensors correspond-ing respectively to the rank-one decompositions of some unfolded matrices. Consequently such new decompositions lead to three new notions of (even-order) tensor ranks, to be called the M-rank, the symmetric M-rank, and the strongly symmetric M-rank in this paper. We discuss the bounds between these new tensor ranks and the CP(CANDECOMP/PARAFAC)-rank and the symmetric CP-rank of an even-order tensor. In particular, we show: (1) these newly defined ranks actually coincide with each other if the even-order tensor in question is super-symmetric; (2) the CP-rank and symmetric CP-rank for a fourth-order tensor can be both lower and upper bounded (up to a constant factor) by the corresponding M-rank. Since the M-rank is much easi-er to compute than the CP-rank, we can replace the CP-rank by the M-rank in the low-CP-rank tensor recovery model. Numerical results on both synthetic data and real data from colored video completion and decomposition problems show that the M-rank is indeed an effective and easy computable approximation of the CP-rank in the context of low-rank tensor recovery.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...s r = 1, where F is called a rank-1 tensor in this case. For a given tensor, finding its best rank-1 approximation, also known as finding the largest eigenvalue of a given tensor, has been studied in =-=[28, 33, 9, 21, 19]-=-. It should be noted that the CP-rank of a real-valued tensor can be different over R and C; i.e., it may hold that rankCP (F) < rankRCP (F) for a real-valued tensor F . As an example, a real-valued 2...

SOS-Hankel Tensors: Theory and Application

by Guoyin Li, Liqun Qi, Yi Xu , 2014
"... ar ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...nvex and nonsmooth, and so, the problem is still a hard problem to solve. As the trace norm promotes a low rank solution, one popular approach is to solve its nuclear norm heuristic (see, for example =-=[14]-=-) the following form: minv∈R(n−1)m+1 1 2 n∑ i1,...,im=1 ‖vi1+...+im−m − Xi1,...,im‖2 + µ‖A‖tr subject to Aα,β = vα+β−2, α, β = 1, . . . , l, and A 0, where ‖A‖tr denotes the trace norm of A and is d...

Article Minimal Rényi–Ingarden–Urbanik Entropy of Multipartite Quantum States

by Marco Enríquez, Zbigniew Puchała
"... entropy ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...s of SVD, the higher order singular value decomposition (HO-SVD) [27] and the parallel factor model (PARAFAC) [28]. Both decompositions were developed in the framework of principal component analysis =-=[29]-=- and have found several applications in signal processing, numerical linear algebra, graph analysis and numerical analysis [30]. Throughout this section, we will consider such schemes to evaluate some...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University