• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Strategic versus Financial Investors: The Role of Strategic Objectives in Financial Contracting. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, (2003)

by S Arping, S Falconieri
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 2 of 2

A Study on High Valuation of Industrial Capital Investment -Based on the Viewpoint of Strategic Benefit

by Sen Li , 2016
"... Abstract Different from the pure financial investors, investors of established company not only take financial returns into account, but also strategic benefits. The existence of strategic benefits distorts the behavior of industrial capital for investment. And high valuation is one of its manifest ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract Different from the pure financial investors, investors of established company not only take financial returns into account, but also strategic benefits. The existence of strategic benefits distorts the behavior of industrial capital for investment. And high valuation is one of its manifestations. This paper constructs a model to illustrate the high valuation of industrial capital investment. If a complementary relationship exists between invested projects and industrial capital investor's core business (i.e. strategic benefit is positive), then the industrial capital investment will result in high valuation; besides, if a substitute relationship exists between the invested projects and industrial capital investor' score business (i.e. strategic benefit is negative), high valuation problem also appears. This paper highlights the origin of high valuation problem, and puts forward corresponding proposals to solve this problem.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...t abroad. It is found that the main difference between industrial capital investors and pure financial investors is that the formers are willing to pay higher price so as to acquire strategic benefits [1]. The main reason why industrial capital investors would like to pay higher evaluation is that the successful invested project may exert positive or negative influences on the current business of industrial capital investors who belong to companies in some certain kinds of fields and own their own main business. And their technologies relied on by the main business is the true influenced ones [2] [3]. Henry Chesbrough (2000) considers that industrial capital investors are equipped with some advantages over pure financial investors. These advantages come from industrial capital investors’ ownership of important basic knowledge and some other intangible assets. Actually these assets can’t be traded freely to some certain extent for the reason that they belong to the investors’ company to own or control. Hence, compared with pure financial investors, industrial capital investors enjoy structural advantages in the development of coordinating and complementary technology. When there exists...

Syndication in private equity industry: comparing the strategies of independent and captive venture capitalists

by Dominique Dufour, Eric Nasica, Dominique Torre
"... ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...he influence of the new venture on the value of the captive VC’s core assets (Hellmann, 2002), differences between captive and independent VCs to enhance the entrepreneur’s incentive to exert effort (=-=Arping and Falconieri, 2010-=-), or by the ability of captive venture capitalists to attain central positions in syndication networks (Keil et al., 2010). This paper is the first to link these two strands of the VC literature. It ...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University