Results 1  10
of
71
Modal Languages And Bounded Fragments Of Predicate Logic
, 1996
"... Model Theory. These are nonempty families I of partial isomorphisms between models M and N , closed under taking restrictions to smaller domains, and satisfying the usual BackandForth properties for extension with objects on either side  restricted to apply only to partial isomorphisms of size ..."
Abstract

Cited by 273 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Model Theory. These are nonempty families I of partial isomorphisms between models M and N , closed under taking restrictions to smaller domains, and satisfying the usual BackandForth properties for extension with objects on either side  restricted to apply only to partial isomorphisms of size at most k . 'Invariance for kpartial isomorphism' means having the same truth value at tuples of objects in any two models that are connected by a partial isomorphism in such a set. The precise sense of this is spelt out in the following proof. 21 Proof (Outline.) kvariable formulas are preserved under partial isomorphism, by a simple induction. More precisely, one proves, for any assignment A and any partial isomorphism IÎI which is defined on the Avalues for all variables x 1 , ..., x k , that M, A = f iff N , IoA = f . The crucial step in the induction is the quantifier case. Quantified variables are irrelevant to the assignment, so that the relevant partial isomorphism can be res...
A Judgmental Analysis of Linear Logic
, 2003
"... We reexamine the foundations of linear logic, developing a system of natural deduction following MartinL of's separation of judgments from propositions. Our construction yields a clean and elegant formulation that accounts for a rich set of multiplicative, additive, and exponential connectives ..."
Abstract

Cited by 60 (32 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We reexamine the foundations of linear logic, developing a system of natural deduction following MartinL of's separation of judgments from propositions. Our construction yields a clean and elegant formulation that accounts for a rich set of multiplicative, additive, and exponential connectives, extending dual intuitionistic linear logic but differing from both classical linear logic and Hyland and de Paiva's full intuitionistic linear logic. We also provide a corresponding sequent calculus that admits a simple proof of the admissibility of cut by a single structural induction. Finally, we show how to interpret classical linear logic (with or without the MIX rule) in our system, employing a form of doublenegation translation.
A Brief Guide to Linear Logic
, 1993
"... An overview of linear logic is given, including an extensive bibliography and a simple example of the close relationship between linear logic and computation. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 53 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
An overview of linear logic is given, including an extensive bibliography and a simple example of the close relationship between linear logic and computation.
Derivation rules as antiaxioms in modal logic
 Journal of Symbolic Logic
, 1993
"... Abstract. We discuss a ‘negative ’ way of defining frame classes in (multi)modal logic, and address the question whether these classes can be axiomatized by derivation rules, the ‘nonξ rules’, styled after Gabbay’s Irreflexivity Rule. The main result of this paper is a metatheorem on completeness ..."
Abstract

Cited by 45 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. We discuss a ‘negative ’ way of defining frame classes in (multi)modal logic, and address the question whether these classes can be axiomatized by derivation rules, the ‘nonξ rules’, styled after Gabbay’s Irreflexivity Rule. The main result of this paper is a metatheorem on completeness, of the following kind: If Λ is a derivation system having a set of axioms that are special Sahlqvist formulas, and Λ+ is the extension of Λ with a set of nonξ rules, then Λ+ is strongly sound and complete with respect to the class of frames determined by the axioms and the rules.
Applications of Linear Logic to Computation: An Overview
, 1993
"... This paper is an overview of existing applications of Linear Logic (LL) to issues of computation. After a substantial introduction to LL, it discusses the implications of LL to functional programming, logic programming, concurrent and objectoriented programming and some other applications of LL, li ..."
Abstract

Cited by 41 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper is an overview of existing applications of Linear Logic (LL) to issues of computation. After a substantial introduction to LL, it discusses the implications of LL to functional programming, logic programming, concurrent and objectoriented programming and some other applications of LL, like semantics of negation in LP, nonmonotonic issues in AI planning, etc. Although the overview covers pretty much the stateoftheart in this area, by necessity many of the works are only mentioned and referenced, but not discussed in any considerable detail. The paper does not presuppose any previous exposition to LL, and is addressed more to computer scientists (probably with a theoretical inclination) than to logicians. The paper contains over 140 references, of which some 80 are about applications of LL. 1 Linear Logic Linear Logic (LL) was introduced in 1987 by Girard [62]. From the very beginning it was recognized as relevant to issues of computation (especially concurrency and stat...
Partial Proof Trees as Building Blocks for a Categorial Grammar
 Linguistics and Philosophy
, 1997
"... We describe a categorial system (PPTS) based on partial proof trees (PPTs) as the building blocks of the system. The PPTs are obtained by unfolding the arguments of the type that would be associated with a lexical item in a simple categorial grammar. The PPTs are the basic types in the system and a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 38 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a categorial system (PPTS) based on partial proof trees (PPTs) as the building blocks of the system. The PPTs are obtained by unfolding the arguments of the type that would be associated with a lexical item in a simple categorial grammar. The PPTs are the basic types in the system and a derivation proceeds by combining PPTs together. We describe the construction of the finite set of basic PPTs and the operations for combining them. PPTS can be viewed as a categorial system incorporating some of the key insights of lexicalized tree adjoining grammar, namely the notion of an extended domain of locality and the consequent factoring of recursion from the domain of dependencies. PPTS therefore inherits the linguistic and computational properties of that system, and so can be viewed as a `middle ground' between a categorial grammar and a phrase structure grammar. We also discuss the relationship between PPTS, natural deduction, and linear logic proofnets, and argue that natural ...
Back and Forth Between Modal Logic and Classical Logic
, 1994
"... Model Theory. That is, we have a nonempty family I of partial isomorphisms between two models M and N, which is closed under taking restrictions to smaller domains, and where the standard BackandForth properties are now restricted to apply only to partial isomorphisms of size at most k. Proof. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Model Theory. That is, we have a nonempty family I of partial isomorphisms between two models M and N, which is closed under taking restrictions to smaller domains, and where the standard BackandForth properties are now restricted to apply only to partial isomorphisms of size at most k. Proof. (A complete argument is in [16].) An outline is reproduced here, for convenience. First, kvariable formulas are preserved under partial isomorphism, by a simple induction. More precisely, one proves, for any assignment A and any partial isomorphism I 2 I which is defined on the Avalues for all variables x 1 ; : : : ; x k , that M;A j= OE iff N; I ffi A j= OE: The crucial step in the induction is the quantifier case. Quantified variables are irrelevant to the assignment, so that the relevant partial isomorphism can be restricted to size at most k \Gamma 1, whence a matching choice for the witness can be made on the opposite side. This proves "only if". Next, "if" has a proof analogous to...
Lambek Grammars Are Context Free
 In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
, 1993
"... In this paper the Chomsky Conjecture is proved: all languages recognized by the Lambek calculus are context free. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 34 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper the Chomsky Conjecture is proved: all languages recognized by the Lambek calculus are context free.
Lambek calculus is NPcomplete
 THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
, 2003
"... We prove that for both the Lambek calculus L and the Lambek calculus allowing empty premises L ∗ the derivability problem is NPcomplete. It follows that also for the multiplicative fragments of cyclic linear logic and noncommutative linear logic the derivability problem is NPcomplete. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 32 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
We prove that for both the Lambek calculus L and the Lambek calculus allowing empty premises L ∗ the derivability problem is NPcomplete. It follows that also for the multiplicative fragments of cyclic linear logic and noncommutative linear logic the derivability problem is NPcomplete.
Incremental processing and acceptability
 Computational Linguistics
, 2000
"... We describe a lefttoright incremental procedure for the processing of Lambek categorial grammar by proof net construction. A simple metric of complexity, the profile in time of the number of unresolved valencies, correctly predicts a wide variety of performance phenomena including garden pathing, ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a lefttoright incremental procedure for the processing of Lambek categorial grammar by proof net construction. A simple metric of complexity, the profile in time of the number of unresolved valencies, correctly predicts a wide variety of performance phenomena including garden pathing, the unacceptability of center embedding, preference for lower attachment, lefttoright quantifier scope preference, and heavy noun phrase shift.