• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Consumers’ Beliefs about Product Benefits: The Effect of Obviously Irrelevant Product Information,” (2002)

by Tom Meyvis, Chris Janiszewski
Venue:Journal of Consumer Research,
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 11 - 20 of 26
Next 10 →

to l

by unknown authors
"... su ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...hich the benefits of the new feature are unknown (Hoeffler, 2003). Past research indeed indicates that features may have a negative effect on product evaluation when consumers see them as irrelevant (=-=Meyvis & Janiszewski, 2002-=-) or trivial (Broniarczyk & Gershoff, 2003). Evidently, adding new features to existing products can have far-reaching consequences, both positive and negative. Ac1 This chapter is an adaptation of Ga...

Four Essays on the Context-Dependence of Consumer Preferences in Situations of Reduced Choice

by Diplom-kauffrau Nicole Wiebach
"... zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum politicarum (Doktor der Wirtschaftswissenschaft) eingereicht an der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum politicarum (Doktor der Wirtschaftswissenschaft) eingereicht an der Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...scription in choice sets. Researchers in adaptive decisionstheory have claimed that the perceived information relevance influences consumers’ decisionmaking process (Bettman, 1979; Dick et al., 1990; =-=Meyvis and Janiszewski, 2002-=-). If givensinformation is perceived as being meaningless, individuals tend to decide referring tossimplifying choice heuristics, for instance, by reverting to dominance structures in thespresented ch...

MAKING DETAILED PREDICTIONS MAKES (SOME) PREDICTIONS WORSE

by Theresa Kelly, Joseph P. Simmons, Theresa F. Kelly , 2015
"... In this paper, we investigate whether making detailed predictions about an event makes other predictions worse. Across 19 experiments, 10,895 participants, and 415,960 predictions about 724 professional sports games, we find that people who made detailed predictions about sporting events (e.g., how ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we investigate whether making detailed predictions about an event makes other predictions worse. Across 19 experiments, 10,895 participants, and 415,960 predictions about 724 professional sports games, we find that people who made detailed predictions about sporting events (e.g., how many hits each baseball team would get) made worse predictions about more general outcomes (e.g., which team would win). We rule out that this effect is caused by inattention or fatigue, thinking too hard, or a differential reliance on holistic information about the teams. Instead, we find that thinking about game-relevant details before predicting winning teams causes people to give less weight to predictive information, presumably because predicting details makes information that is relatively useless for predicting the winning team more readily accessible in memory and therefore incorporated into forecasts. Furthermore, we show that this differential use of information can be used to predict what kinds of games will and will not be susceptible to the negative

Application of the Instrumental-Symbolic Framework within an Employer Positioning Context: A Test Using Perceptual Maps

by Martin Lauzier , Marc Roy
"... This study investigates the use and validity of perceptual mapping as a tool for employer positioning from ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
This study investigates the use and validity of perceptual mapping as a tool for employer positioning from
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...rganization is flexible in regards the way you accomplish your work 14 7.27 2.05 Journal of Organizational Psychology vol. 11(2) 2011 37 It should be noted that only attributes marked with an asterisk have been selected for the second part of the experiment. In order to be retained, an attribute needed to satisfy two conditions, that is, a) to be ranked in the top 10 for the attractiveness measure and b) to have an average score of at least 7 on the relative importance scale. Based on these indicators, and considering prior marketing research (e.g. Aaker, 2000; Ahluwalia & Gürhan-Canli, 2000; Meyvis & Janiszewski, 2002), only eight (8) attributes were kept. The third step was the choice of companies to be tested, this to draw up a list of potential employers for the participants in the second part of the research. This selection was made by using business indexes found in the specialized print media. For the purposes of our study, we chose to use ranking indexes published by Les Affaires newspaper which publishes, among others, two business classification indicators, namely: a) a ranking based on profitability and b) a ranking based on popularity. Two key premises guided our judgment in the choice of the emp...

Positively Useless: Irrelevant Negative Information Enhances Positive Impressions

by Yael Steinhart , Meyrav Shoham , Sarit Moldovan , Yael Steinhart , 2015
"... In a series of studies we demonstrate that irrelevant information (unhelpful user reviews) can enhance product evaluations and satisfaction-if framed negatively. When unhelpful negative reviews appear alongside positive ones, consumers infer that there is nothing negative to say about the product, ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
In a series of studies we demonstrate that irrelevant information (unhelpful user reviews) can enhance product evaluations and satisfaction-if framed negatively. When unhelpful negative reviews appear alongside positive ones, consumers infer that there is nothing negative to say about the product, which boosts the impact of the positive reviews.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...views do not provide the expected diagnostic value, so they are perceived as unhelpful, yet they lead consumers to infer that the worst is known and the product really is as good as advertised. This boosts the perceived usefulness of the positive information, resulting in more positive evaluations. Past research has demonstrated that irrelevant information can have positive effects if it is valued by consumers (Carpenter, Glazer, and Nakamoto 1994), but also that it can reduce product evaluations if not valued (Brown and Carpenter 2000) or dilute the impact of more relevant information (e.g., Meyvis and Janiszewski 2002). We build on this research and suggest that the way irrelevant information is presented can determine its impact. We predict that when irrelevant information, such as an unhelpful review, is framed negatively, it can lead to higher product evaluations and purchase intentions. More specifically, we hypothesize that evaluations will be more positive when a review set includes an unhelpful review that is framed negatively rather than positively, and compared to sets without an unhelpful review. This hypothesis is confirmed in a series of five studies. In study 1, participants evaluated an espres...

Proximate Emotion and Distant Reason: Temporal Inference in Word-Of-Mouth

by Linda Hagen , Ed O'brien , Linda Hagen , Ed O'brien , 2015
"... Five field and laboratory studies reveal that word-of-mouth opinions (in online reviews) are significantly less persuasive when shared at "proximate" (soon after) versus "distant" (long after) points of purchase. This occurs because proximate reviewers are assumed to be emotiona ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Five field and laboratory studies reveal that word-of-mouth opinions (in online reviews) are significantly less persuasive when shared at "proximate" (soon after) versus "distant" (long after) points of purchase. This occurs because proximate reviewers are assumed to be emotional/ irrational, discrediting otherwise identical content shared by distant reviewers. [to cite]:
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...views do not provide the expected diagnostic value, so they are perceived as unhelpful, yet they lead consumers to infer that the worst is known and the product really is as good as advertised. This boosts the perceived usefulness of the positive information, resulting in more positive evaluations. Past research has demonstrated that irrelevant information can have positive effects if it is valued by consumers (Carpenter, Glazer, and Nakamoto 1994), but also that it can reduce product evaluations if not valued (Brown and Carpenter 2000) or dilute the impact of more relevant information (e.g., Meyvis and Janiszewski 2002). We build on this research and suggest that the way irrelevant information is presented can determine its impact. We predict that when irrelevant information, such as an unhelpful review, is framed negatively, it can lead to higher product evaluations and purchase intentions. More specifically, we hypothesize that evaluations will be more positive when a review set includes an unhelpful review that is framed negatively rather than positively, and compared to sets without an unhelpful review. This hypothesis is confirmed in a series of five studies. In study 1, participants evaluated an espres...

The Effect of Irrelevant Information on Consumer Irritation and Attitudes: the Moderating Role of Need to Evaluate

by Abhijit Biswas , Wayne , Sweta Chaturvedi Thota
"... EXTENDED ABSTRACT -Past research has investigated the effect of irrelevant information related to the advertised product on consumers' beliefs in the product's ability to deliver the desired benefit. The results suggest that irrelevant product information systematically weakens consumers& ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
EXTENDED ABSTRACT -Past research has investigated the effect of irrelevant information related to the advertised product on consumers' beliefs in the product's ability to deliver the desired benefit. The results suggest that irrelevant product information systematically weakens consumers' beliefs that the product will provide the desired benefit. An interesting question that follows is if the impact of brand related irrelevant information is considerable to the extent it may systematically weaken the impact of diagnostic information, then what would be the impact of non-brand related irrelevant information, as it is likely to be in the context of crossselling? Is the impact of such irrelevant information negative to the extent that it causes irritation in consumers? Since irritation can have negative consequences, does such irrelevant information lead to negative reactions toward the focal product as well as the advertiser? The above questions assume importance whenCin an attempt to make additional salesCadvertisers and salespeople frequently expose consumers to a substantial amount of information that may be irrelevant to the product under consideration.

"Don'T Buy" Or "Do Not Buy"? Negation Style and Product Evaluations

by Soyoung Kim , Sarah Moore , Kyle Murray
"... We investigate how negation style-that is, contracted ("isn't") versus full negations ("is not")-in online reviews influences product evaluations. When reviews contain contracted negations, consumers evaluate the target product more positively than when reviews contain full ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
We investigate how negation style-that is, contracted ("isn't") versus full negations ("is not")-in online reviews influences product evaluations. When reviews contain contracted negations, consumers evaluate the target product more positively than when reviews contain full negations. This effect is driven by consumers' perceptions of reviewers' warmth and knowledge.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...views do not provide the expected diagnostic value, so they are perceived as unhelpful, yet they lead consumers to infer that the worst is known and the product really is as good as advertised. This boosts the perceived usefulness of the positive information, resulting in more positive evaluations. Past research has demonstrated that irrelevant information can have positive effects if it is valued by consumers (Carpenter, Glazer, and Nakamoto 1994), but also that it can reduce product evaluations if not valued (Brown and Carpenter 2000) or dilute the impact of more relevant information (e.g., Meyvis and Janiszewski 2002). We build on this research and suggest that the way irrelevant information is presented can determine its impact. We predict that when irrelevant information, such as an unhelpful review, is framed negatively, it can lead to higher product evaluations and purchase intentions. More specifically, we hypothesize that evaluations will be more positive when a review set includes an unhelpful review that is framed negatively rather than positively, and compared to sets without an unhelpful review. This hypothesis is confirmed in a series of five studies. In study 1, participants evaluated an espres...

AMITAV CHAKRAVARTI

by Gülden Ülkümen, Vicki G. Morwitz, Tom Meyvis , 2007
"... Nelson, and Yaacov Trope on earlier versions of the manuscript. 2 We find that exposure to broad versus narrow categorizations in a task alters consumers’ information processing styles, which in turn alters their categorizing and purchasing behavior in a variety of subsequent and unrelated tasks, fr ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Nelson, and Yaacov Trope on earlier versions of the manuscript. 2 We find that exposure to broad versus narrow categorizations in a task alters consumers’ information processing styles, which in turn alters their categorizing and purchasing behavior in a variety of subsequent and unrelated tasks, from basic cognitive behaviors (e.g., grouping), and consumer decisions (e.g., new product adoptions), to more general decision making strategies (e.g., susceptibility to heuristics). Consumers previously exposed to a decision context with broad categorizations adopt a more lenient, and tolerant processing orientation. In contrast, consumers previously exposed to a decision context with narrow categorizations adopt a careful and critical processing orientation. Consequently, prior exposure to broad categorizations leads to greater susceptibility to many context effects and decision heuristics, whereas prior exposure to narrow categorizations leads to more careful and considered decisions, invariable across contexts. 3 The world that consumers encounter comprises a vast collection of objects and events that can be infinitely partitioned, generalized, or categorized. Changing the characteristics of these externally imposed categorizations in the decision environment can significantly influence

NJ: Information Today. Credibility: A Multidisciplinary Framework

by Soo Young Rieh, David R. Danielson
"... This chapter reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on the concept of credibility and its areas of application relevant to information science and technology, encompassing several disciplinary approaches. An information seeker’s environment—the Internet, television, newspapers, schools, li ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
This chapter reviews the theoretical and empirical literature on the concept of credibility and its areas of application relevant to information science and technology, encompassing several disciplinary approaches. An information seeker’s environment—the Internet, television, newspapers, schools, libraries, bookstores, and social networks—abounds with information
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...bility sources, however, claims not relevant to a primary message or central argument within an advertisement can hinder the effectiveness of the message and render it less credible (Mackenzie, 1986; =-=Meyvis & Janiszewski, 2002-=-). Verification Probably the most critical aspect of product claims with respect to credibility regards if, when, and at what cost consumers may verify such claims. Nelson (1970, 1974) initially explo...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University