Results 1 -
3 of
3
2012. Accounting for Voice Mismatch in Ellipsis
- In Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics
"... ..."
(Show Context)
Pseudogapping as pseudo-VP ellipsis
"... Abstract In this paper, we propose an analysis of pseudogapping in Hybrid Type-Logical Categorial Grammar (Hybrid TLCG; Kubota 2010; Kubota and Levine 2012). Pseudogapping poses a particularly challenging problem for previous analyses in both the transformational and nontransformational literature. ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract In this paper, we propose an analysis of pseudogapping in Hybrid Type-Logical Categorial Grammar (Hybrid TLCG; Kubota 2010; Kubota and Levine 2012). Pseudogapping poses a particularly challenging problem for previous analyses in both the transformational and nontransformational literature. We argue that the flexible syntaxsemantics interface of Hybrid TLCG enables an analysis of pseudogapping that synthesizes the key insights of both transformational and nontransformational approaches, while at the same time overcoming the major difficulties of each type of approach. Keywords: pseudogapping, VP ellipsis, anaphora, syntactic identity, Hybrid Type-Logical Categorial Grammar 0 We are indebted to the following people for comments and discussions: Ai Kubota, Scott Martin, Philip Miller, Jordan Needle, Carl Pollard, and Daniel Puthawala. We would also like to thank the two LI reviewers for their insightful comments. We have presented parts of the present work at various venues, including LACL 2014, the syntax semantics group Synners at OSU, and the Semantics Workshop in Tokai (Nagoya). We would like to thank the audiences at these venues for their feedback.
AccountingforVoiceMismatchinEllipsis
"... Common approaches to ellipsis typically posit one of two kinds of identity between elided material andsomelocalantecedent: syntacticorsemantic,exclusively. Whensuchidentityispresent,theellipsis isallowed,andnototherwise. Thefactthatmismatchesinvoicebetweenantecedentandelidedmaterial are only sometim ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Common approaches to ellipsis typically posit one of two kinds of identity between elided material andsomelocalantecedent: syntacticorsemantic,exclusively. Whensuchidentityispresent,theellipsis isallowed,andnototherwise. Thefactthatmismatchesinvoicebetweenantecedentandelidedmaterial are only sometimes allowed poses problems for both theories. Athird, hybrid approach –the discourse