• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. (2007)

by N Unsworth, R W Engle
Venue:Psychological Bulletin,
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 10 of 49
Next 10 →

Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: The gap is not that deep

by Florian Schmiedek, Andrea Hildebr, Max Planck, Oliver Wilhelm, Ulman Lindenberger - Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 2009
"... How to best measure working memory capacity is an issue of ongoing debate. Besides established complex span tasks, which combine short-term memory demands with generally unrelated secondary tasks, there exists a set of paradigms characterized by continuous and simultaneous updating of several items ..."
Abstract - Cited by 18 (5 self) - Add to MetaCart
How to best measure working memory capacity is an issue of ongoing debate. Besides established complex span tasks, which combine short-term memory demands with generally unrelated secondary tasks, there exists a set of paradigms characterized by continuous and simultaneous updating of several items in working memory, such as the n-back, memory updating, or alpha span tasks. With a latent variable analysis (N 96) based on content-heterogeneous operationalizations of both task families, the authors found a latent correlation between a complex span factor and an updating factor that was not statistically different from unity (r .96). Moreover, both factors predicted fluid intelligence (reasoning) equally well. The authors conclude that updating tasks measure working memory equally well as complex span tasks. Processes involved in building, maintaining, and updating arbitrary bindings may constitute the common working memory ability underlying performance on reasoning, complex span, and updating tasks.

Domaingeneral mechanisms of complex working memory span

by Jason M Chein , Adam B Moore , Andrew R A Conway - Neuroimage , 2011
"... A new fMRI complex working memory span paradigm was used to identify brain regions making domaingeneral contributions to working memory task performance. For both verbal and spatial versions of the task, complex working memory span performance increased the activity in lateral prefrontal, anterior ..."
Abstract - Cited by 12 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
A new fMRI complex working memory span paradigm was used to identify brain regions making domaingeneral contributions to working memory task performance. For both verbal and spatial versions of the task, complex working memory span performance increased the activity in lateral prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and parietal cortices during the Encoding, Maintenance, and Coordination phase of task performance. Meanwhile, overlapping activity in anterior prefrontal and medial temporal lobe regions was associated with both verbal and spatial recall from working memory. These findings help to adjudicate several contested issues regarding the executive mechanisms of working memory, the separability of short-term and working memory in the verbal and spatial domains, and the relative contribution of short-term and long-term memory mechanisms to working memory capacity. The study also provides a vital bridge between psychometric and neuroimaging approaches to working memory, and constrains our understanding of how working memory may contribute to the broader landscape of cognitive performance.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...aver et al., 1997; Owen et al., 2005). Although a relatively small number of studies have required recall rather than recognition (Gilbert and Fiez, 2004; Osaka et al., 2004), very few studies have also included an analysis of neural activity during the recall period (cf. Chein and Fiez, 2001). This emphasis on recognition tasks, and on trial periods that precede retrieval, is unfortunate in light of recent work indicating that an important mechanism underlying individual differences in WM capacity is the ability to select and use retrieval cues to optimally focus memory search during recall (Unsworth and Engle, 2007a,b). The requirement for recall also more realistically reflects the complex cognitive behavior exhibited in such tasks as reading, reasoning, and problem solving, which all require the rapid recall of recently acquired knowledge. The present study reflects an effort to bridge the divide 551J.M. Chein et al. / NeuroImage 54 (2011) 550–559between the neuroimaging and psychometric/behavioral literatures by addressing these earlier limitations. The measurement of WM capacity Variation in WM capacity across individuals correlates strongly with performance on a range of complex cognitive tasks (e....

Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks

by Thomas S Redick , James M Broadway , Matt E Meier , Princy S Kuriakose , Nash Unsworth , Michael J Kane , Randall W Engle - European Journal of Psychological Assessment , 2012
"... Abstract. Individual differences in working memory capacity are related to a variety of behaviors both within and outside of the lab. Recently developed automated complex span tasks have contributed to increasing our knowledge concerning working memory capacity by making valid and reliable assessme ..."
Abstract - Cited by 7 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Individual differences in working memory capacity are related to a variety of behaviors both within and outside of the lab. Recently developed automated complex span tasks have contributed to increasing our knowledge concerning working memory capacity by making valid and reliable assessments freely available for use by researchers. Combining the samples from three testing locations yielded data from over 6,000 young adult participants who performed at least one of three such tasks (Operation, Symmetry, and Reading Span). Normative data are presented here for researchers interested in applying cutoffs for their own applications, and information on the validity and reliability of the tasks is also reported. In addition, the data were analyzed as a function of sex and college status. While automated complex span tasks are just one way to measure working memory capacity, the use of a standardized procedure for administration and scoring greatly facilitates comparison across studies. Keywords: working memory capacity, individual differences, validity, reliability Throughout the psychological literature, working memory capacity (WMC) is a critical construct for cognitive functioning. Numerous studies showed that WMC is strongly related to intelligence Therefore, the proper measurement of individual differences in WMC is critical. To facilitate accurate and reliable measurement, Engle and colleagues created and made freely available automated versions of three of the most widely used WMC measures (Operation, Symmetry, and Reading Span), which take into account psychometric and theoretical considerations known to influence scores on these tasks. In the present article, we highlight the broad applicability of automated complex span tasks (CSTs) and present new analyses of data collected at three testing locations over the past 8 years. We begin with some background on the use of CSTs as WMC measures. CSTs as WMC Measures Simple span tasks such as Digit Span and Corsi Blocks, in which subjects serially report a series of items presented, have been widely used in standardized intelligence test batteries. The Reading Span
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...ronoun reference criteria measures. This finding supported the view that CSTs measure a dynamic working memory system that involves both the storage and processing of information, in contrast to simple span tasks, which measure a short-term memory capacity that involves storage only. Meta-analyses showed DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000123 European Journal of Psychological Assessment 2012; Vol. 28(3):164–171 © 2012 Hogrefe Publishing that CST performance is strongly related to reading comprehension (Daneman & Merikle, 1996) and fluid intelligence (Ackerman, Beier, & Boyle, 2005; Kane et al., 2005; Unsworth & Engle, 2007), and that effects of cognitive aging are larger for CSTs than for simple span tasks (Bopp & Verhaeghen, 2005). After the introduction of Reading Span, subsequent research explored potential associations of the processing component in CSTs with criterion-related abilities. Turner and Engle (1989) showed with Operation Span that the processing content of the CST (viz., math operations) need not be similar to the ability criterion in order to measure WMC. Later, Shah and Miyake (1996) developed Symmetry Span, in which participants made symmetry judgments and remembered spatial locations. Shah an...

Memory Maintenance and Inhibitory Control Differentiate from Early Childhood to Adolescence

by Yee Lee Shing, Ulman Lindenberger, Adele Diamond, Shu-chen Li, Matthew C. Davidson
"... Existing evidence suggests that the organization of cognitive functions may differentiate during de-velopment. We investigated two key components of executive functions, memory maintenance and inhibitory control, by applying latent factor models appropriate for examining developmental differ-ences i ..."
Abstract - Cited by 7 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Existing evidence suggests that the organization of cognitive functions may differentiate during de-velopment. We investigated two key components of executive functions, memory maintenance and inhibitory control, by applying latent factor models appropriate for examining developmental differ-ences in functional associations among aspects of cognition. Two-hundred and sixty-three children (aged 4 to 14 years) were administered tasks that required maintaining rules in mind or inhibiting a prepotent tendency to respond on the same side as the stimulus. Memory maintenance and inhibitory control were not separable in children of 4–7 or 7–9.5 years, but were differentiated in an older group (9.5–14.5 years). Psychometric research generally emphasizes the stability of the structure of cognitive abilities (see Carroll, 1993; Sternberg, 1994, for reviews). In contrast, multivariate research on cognitive development in children and older adults highlights developmental differences in the structure of cognitive abilities and their functional organization (Cattell, 1971; Flavell, 1982; Garrett, 1946; Horn, 1968; Jones & Conrad, 1933). One of the main hypotheses concerning changes in the func-tional organization of cognitive abilities during child development is the differentiation hypothe-sis (e.g., Garrett, 1946). It postulates that the structure of intelligence develops from a relatively
(Show Context)

Citation Context

... ov em be rs20 10 higher-order cognition, and goal-directed behavior (Camos, 2008; Dempster, 1992; Harnishfeger & Bjorklund, 1993; Houdé & Tzourio-Mazoyer, 2003; St Clair-Thompson & Gathercole, 2006; =-=Unsworth & Engle, 2007-=-) important for success in school and in life (e.g., Diamond, Barnett, Thomas, Munro, 2007). A child’s capacity to retain and work with information held in mind (i.e., working memory) and to suppress ...

The Contributions of Primary and Secondary Memory to Working Memory Capacity: An Individual Differences Analysis of Immediate Free Recall

by Nash Unsworth, Gregory J. Spillers, Gene A. Brewer
"... The present study tested the dual-component model of working memory capacity (WMC) by examining estimates of primary memory and secondary memory from an immediate free recall task. Participants completed multiple measures of WMC and general intellectual ability as well as multiple trials of an immed ..."
Abstract - Cited by 3 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
The present study tested the dual-component model of working memory capacity (WMC) by examining estimates of primary memory and secondary memory from an immediate free recall task. Participants completed multiple measures of WMC and general intellectual ability as well as multiple trials of an immediate free recall task. It was demonstrated that there are 2 sources of variance (primary memory and secondary memory) in immediate free recall and that, further, these 2 sources of variance accounted for independent variation in WMC. Together, these results are consistent with a dual-component model of WMC reflecting individual differences in maintenance in primary memory and in retrieval from secondary memory. Theoretical implications for working memory and dual-component models of free recall are discussed.

Strategies in visuospatial working memory for learning virtual shapes

by Glenn Gordon Smith , Albert Dieter Ritzhaupt , Edwin Tjoe - Applied Cognitive Psychology , 2010
"... SUMMARY This study investigated visuospatial working memory (WM) strategies people use to remember unfamiliar randomly generated shapes in the context of an interactive computer-based visuospatial WM task. In a three-phase experiment with random shapes, participants (n ¼ 94) first interactively det ..."
Abstract - Cited by 2 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
SUMMARY This study investigated visuospatial working memory (WM) strategies people use to remember unfamiliar randomly generated shapes in the context of an interactive computer-based visuospatial WM task. In a three-phase experiment with random shapes, participants (n ¼ 94) first interactively determined if two equivalent shapes were rotated or reflected; second, memorized the shape; and third, determined if an imprint in a profile view of the ground was a rotated, reflected imprint of the shape, or an imprint not matching the original shape. Participants self-reported these strategies: Key feature, shape interaction, association/elaboration, holistic/perspective, divide and conquer, mental rotation/reflection and others. Participants reporting key features strategy were significantly more accurate on the computer-based visuospatial WM task. These results highlight the importance of strategy in visuospatial WM.

An Eye-tracking Study of Feature-based Choice in One-shot Games (Unpublished Results

by Giovanna Devetag, Sibilla Di Guida, Luca Polonio, Giovanna Devetag, Sibilla Di Guida, Luca Polonio , 2012
"... An eye-tracking study of feature-based choice in one-shot games ..."
Abstract - Cited by 2 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
An eye-tracking study of feature-based choice in one-shot games
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...cts were asked toscomplete a questionnaire analyzing cognitive abilities, personality traits, and risksaversion. In particular, subjects had to complete: an immediate free recall workingsmemory test (=-=Unsworth and Engle 2007-=-), a Wechsler Digit Span test for shortsmemory (Walsh and Betz 1990), the Cognitive Reflection Test (Frederick 2005),sthe Holt and Laury Risk Aversion test (Holt and Laury 2002), a test of Theory ofsM...

Similarities and differences between working memory and long-term memory: Evidence from the levels-of-processing span task

by Nathan S. Rose, Joel Myerson, Henry L. Roediger Iii, Ra Hale - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 2010
"... Two experiments compared the effects of depth of processing on working memory (WM) and long-term memory (LTM) using a levels-of-processing (LOP) span task, a newly developed WM span procedure that involves processing to-be-remembered words based on their visual, phonological, or semantic characteris ..."
Abstract - Cited by 2 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Two experiments compared the effects of depth of processing on working memory (WM) and long-term memory (LTM) using a levels-of-processing (LOP) span task, a newly developed WM span procedure that involves processing to-be-remembered words based on their visual, phonological, or semantic characteristics. Depth of processing had minimal effect on WM tests, yet subsequent memory for the same items on delayed tests showed the typical benefits of semantic processing. Although the difference in LOP effects demonstrates a dissociation between WM and LTM, we also found that the retrieval practice provided by recalling words on the WM task benefited long-term retention, especially for words initially recalled from supraspan lists. The latter result is consistent with the hypothesis that WM span tasks involve retrieval from secondary memory, but the LOP dissociation suggests the processes engaged by WM and LTM tests may differ. Therefore, similarities and differences between WM and LTM depend on the extent to which retrieval from secondary memory is involved and whether there is a match (or mismatch) between initial processing and subsequent retrieval, consistent with transfer-appropriate-processing theory.

Working Memory and Fluid Intelligence in Young Children

by Doi /j. Intell, Andrew R. A. Conway, Susan E. Gathercole
"... This is the author’s copy of the article. The definitive version has been published in ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
This is the author’s copy of the article. The definitive version has been published in

Microradiography: a review

by Maria Engström, Anne-marie L, Thomas Karlsson, John J. Foxe, Albert Einstein, Thomas Karlsson , 1955
"... doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00140 Brain and effort: brain activation and effort-related working memory in healthy participants and patients with working memory deficits ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00140 Brain and effort: brain activation and effort-related working memory in healthy participants and patients with working memory deficits
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...y complex working memory tasks more than traditional short-term memory tasks are related to fundamental aspects of cognition is that complex tasks involve larger investments of attentional resources (=-=Unsworth and Engle, 2007-=-). Traditional short-term tasks, on the other hand, capitalize relatively more on skills that have become automatized through extended practice (e.g., rehearsal of digits, which is an integral part of...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University