• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

Decoupling as a Sustainable Firm Response to Pressures for Convergence and Divergence in Corporate Governance: The Case of Codes of Good Corporate Governance. (2014)

by M Krenn
Venue:Journal of Management Policy and Practice,
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 1 of 1

Stubborn Swedes: The Persistence of the Swedish Corporate Governance System under International Reform *

by Karin Jonnergård , Ulf Larsson-Olaison , Karin Jonnergård , Ulf Larsson-Olaison , Karin Jonnergård , Ulf Larsson-Olaison
"... Abstract Despite a number of corporate governance reforms introduced following an Anglo-American blueprint, the Swedish corporate governance system still contains several country-specific traits. In this article, we try to understand this continuity of the national corporate governance system. We d ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract Despite a number of corporate governance reforms introduced following an Anglo-American blueprint, the Swedish corporate governance system still contains several country-specific traits. In this article, we try to understand this continuity of the national corporate governance system. We do this by outlining a model for describing the processes of change built on Mary Douglas ' (1986) 'sacred objects' and (ii) theory of 'institutional thinking' and applying this model to a case of the implementation of regulation on independent directors in Sweden. The results highlight (i) that continuity is ensured through the use of
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...e literature on convergence between different governance systems is vast (reviewed by Rasheed and Yoshikawa, 2012). This research indicate that both convergence and divergence occur as corporate governance reforms are diffused between systems, leading at least in the short run to so-called hybrid systems (e.g. Rose and Mayer, 2003; Buck, et al., 2004), i.e., mutual influences between the UK/USA systems and other systems (Thomsen, 2004; Aguilera and Jackson, 2010). The research focus has therefor moved to describing which parts of a corporate system persist and which parts undergo change (e.g. Krenn, 2014). Often it is assumed that the globalization of financial capital has trigger a standardization of corporate governance regulation (Gordon and Roe, 2004; Rasheed and Yoshikawa, 2012). However, this ostensible standardization masks significant variations. Hence, even though comparisons between national corporate governance codes have shown that most codes are structured as the Cadbury code (Aguilera and Jackson, 2010; Thomsen, 2006), they may differ in their details and their application (Lau Hansen, 2006; Larsson-Olaison, 2014). Thus, even in highly standardized areas some features of national...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University