Results 1 - 10
of
13
Phylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we?
- Trends in Ecology and Evolution,
, 2013
"... To date, there is little evidence that phylogenetic diversity has contributed to nature conservation. Here, we discuss the scientific justification of using phylogenetic diversity in conservation and the reasons for its neglect. We show that, apart from valuing the rarity and richness aspect, commo ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 12 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
To date, there is little evidence that phylogenetic diversity has contributed to nature conservation. Here, we discuss the scientific justification of using phylogenetic diversity in conservation and the reasons for its neglect. We show that, apart from valuing the rarity and richness aspect, commonly quoted justifications based on the usage of phylogenetic diversity as a proxy for functional diversity or evolutionary potential are still based on uncertainties. We discuss how a missing guideline through the variety of phylogenetic diversity metrics and their relevance for conservation might be responsible for the hesitation to include phylogenetic diversity in conservation practice. We outline research routes that can help to ease uncertainties and bridge gaps between research and conservation with respect to phylogenetic diversity. A promising but yet ambiguous additional biodiversity component for conservation More than two decades ago, Richard Vane-Wright et al. However, despite the increasing number of studies, the scientific proof of the added value of phylogenetic diversity for nature conservation remains weak. We believe that this is one of the main reasons why phylogenetic diversity is largely neglected in conservation practice In addition to the more general concept of conserving all components of biodiversity because of their intrinsic values, we identified four main conservation approaches that are commonly proposed as central justifications for the conservation of phylogenetic diversity: (i) the rarity aspect; (ii) the richness aspect; (iii) phylogenetic diversity as a proxy for functional diversity; and (iv) phylogenetic diversity as a proxy for evolutionary potential. Along these lines, we emphasize that a sound conceptual justification for the added value of phylogenetic diversity is often missing. We finally highlight desirable research avenues to increase our knowledge of the role of phylogenetic diversity and of how it could potentially improve conservation in the future. Phylogenetic diversity as an intrinsic biodiversity component One general agreement is to conserve all components of biodiversity
Darwinian shortfalls in biodiversity conservation
, 2013
"... If we were to describe all the species on Earth and determine their distributions, we would solve the popularly termed 'Linnean' and 'Wallacean' shortfalls in biodiversity conservation. Even so, we would still be hindered by a 'Darwinian shortfall', that is, the lack o ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
If we were to describe all the species on Earth and determine their distributions, we would solve the popularly termed 'Linnean' and 'Wallacean' shortfalls in biodiversity conservation. Even so, we would still be hindered by a 'Darwinian shortfall', that is, the lack of relevant phylogenetic information for most organisms. Overall, there are too few comprehensive phylogenies, large uncertainties in the estimation of divergence times, and, most critically, unknown evolutionary models linking phylogenies to relevant ecological traits and life history variation. Here, we discuss these issues and offer suggestions for further research to support evolutionary-based conservation planning. Species, phylogenies, and biodiversity conservation Species are considered indisputable units in conservation and biodiversity analyses. For example, Costello et al. Methodological and conceptual advances to delimitate species (e.g., That said, and despite many syntheses and discussions on the need to better incorporate evolution into conservation The Darwinian shortfall We recognize three closely coupled components of the Darwinian shortfall Lack of comprehensive phylogenies The first component is the lack of useable phylogenies for most groups of organism. First, few comprehensive (in the sense of including all species in a taxon) phylogenies exist
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Evolutionary patterns in the assembly of fern diversity on the oceanic Mascarene Islands
"... Aim To provide insights into the assembly and structure of biotic communi-ties by exploring several processes of island biodiversity assembly: in situ speci-ation, immigration and ecological processes. Location The Mascarene Islands. Methods The phylogenetic relationships of 211 out of 232 Mascarene ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Aim To provide insights into the assembly and structure of biotic communi-ties by exploring several processes of island biodiversity assembly: in situ speci-ation, immigration and ecological processes. Location The Mascarene Islands. Methods The phylogenetic relationships of 211 out of 232 Mascarene leptosp-orangiate fern species were reconstructed in relation to a global phylogeny of 400 leptosporangiate fern species to assess the importance of immigration ver-sus in situ speciation and any deviation from randomness. Correlations between speciation and habit (terrestrial or epiphytic/lithophytic) were tested. Results We inferred at least 197 colonization events onto the islands, account-ing for> 80 % of their leptosporangiate fern diversity. The phylogenetic struc-ture of the assemblage of colonists was mostly overdispersed but aggregated at the tips of the phylogeny. Several families were more diverse on the islands than expected by their global richness. Among the 46 endemic species, up to
IDEA AND PERSPECT IVE Effects of trophic similarity on community composition
"... Understanding how ecological processes determine patterns among species coexisting within eco-systems is central to ecology. Here, we explore relationships between species ’ local coexistence and their trophic niches in terms of their feeding relationships both as consumers and as resources. We buil ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Understanding how ecological processes determine patterns among species coexisting within eco-systems is central to ecology. Here, we explore relationships between species ’ local coexistence and their trophic niches in terms of their feeding relationships both as consumers and as resources. We build on recent concepts and methods from community phylogenetics to develop a framework for analysing mechanisms responsible for community composition using trophic similarity among species and null models of community assembly. We apply this framework to 50 food webs found in 50 Adirondack lakes and find that species composition in these communities appears to be dri-ven by both bottom-up effects by which the presence of prey species selects for predators of those prey, and top-down effects by which prey more tolerant of predation out-compete less tolerant prey of the same predators. This approach to community food webs is broadly applicable and shows how species interaction networks can inform an increasingly large array of theory central to community ecology.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina,
"... environmental influences on the taxonomic and functional structure of Atlantic reef fish assemblages ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
environmental influences on the taxonomic and functional structure of Atlantic reef fish assemblages
unknown title
, 2015
"... Explaining forest productivity using tree functional traits and phylogenetic information: two sides of the same coin over evolutionary scale? ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Explaining forest productivity using tree functional traits and phylogenetic information: two sides of the same coin over evolutionary scale?
Combining food web and species distribution models for improved
"... community projections ..."
(Show Context)
RESEARCH ARTICLE Common Ancestry Is a Poor Predictor of Competitive Traits in Freshwater Green Algae
"... Phytoplankton species traits have been used to successfully predict the outcome of compe-tition, but these traits are notoriously laborious to measure. If these traits display a phyloge-netic signal, phylogenetic distance (PD) can be used as a proxy for trait variation. We provide the first investig ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Phytoplankton species traits have been used to successfully predict the outcome of compe-tition, but these traits are notoriously laborious to measure. If these traits display a phyloge-netic signal, phylogenetic distance (PD) can be used as a proxy for trait variation. We provide the first investigation of the degree of phylogenetic signal in traits related to competi-tion in freshwater green phytoplankton. We measured 17 traits related to competition and tested whether they displayed a phylogenetic signal across a molecular phylogeny of 59 species of green algae. We also assessed the fit of five models of trait evolution to trait vari-ation across the phylogeny. There was no significant phylogenetic signal for 13 out of 17 ecological traits. For 7 traits, a non-phylogenetic model provided the best fit. For another 7 traits, a phylogenetic model was selected, but parameter values indicated that trait variation evolved recently, diminishing the importance of common ancestry. This study suggests that traits related to competition in freshwater green algae are not generally well-predicted by patterns of common ancestry. We discuss the mechanisms by which the link between phy-logenetic distance and phenotypic differentiation may be broken.
Conservation Action Based on Threatened Species Capture Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Richness in Breeding and Wintering Populations of Central Asian Birds
"... Although phylogenetic diversity has been suggested to be relevant from a conservation point of view, its role is still limited in applied nature conservation. Recently, the practice of investing conservation resources based on threatened species was identified as a reason for the slow integration of ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Although phylogenetic diversity has been suggested to be relevant from a conservation point of view, its role is still limited in applied nature conservation. Recently, the practice of investing conservation resources based on threatened species was identified as a reason for the slow integration of phylogenetic diversity in nature conservation planning. One of the main arguments is based on the observation that threatened species are not evenly distributed over the phylogenetic tree. However this argument seems to dismiss the fact that conservation action is a spatially explicit process, and even if threatened species are not evenly distributed over the phylogenetic tree, the occurrence of threatened species could still indicate areas with above average phylogenetic diversity and consequently could protect phylogenetic diversity. Here we aim to study the selection of important bird areas in Central Asia, which were nominated largely based on the presence of threatened bird species. We show that although threatened species occurring in Central Asia do not capture phylogenetically more distinct species than expected by chance, the current spatially explicit conservation approach of selecting important bird areas covers above average taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of breeding and wintering birds. We conclude that the spatially explicit processes of conservation actions need to be considered in the current discussion of
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
"... All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.