Results 1 -
7 of
7
Evaluation of Image Pre-Processing Techniques for Eigenface Based Face Recognition
, 2002
"... We present a range of image processing techniques as potential pre-processing steps, which attempt to improve the performance of the eigenface method of face recognition. Verification tests are carried out by applying thresholds to gather false acceptance rate (FAR) and false rejection rate (FRR) re ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 23 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present a range of image processing techniques as potential pre-processing steps, which attempt to improve the performance of the eigenface method of face recognition. Verification tests are carried out by applying thresholds to gather false acceptance rate (FAR) and false rejection rate (FRR) results from a data set comprised of images that present typical difficulties when attempting recognition, such as strong variations in lighting direction and intensity, partially covered faces and changes in facial expression. Results are compared using the equal error rate (EER), which is the error rate when FAR is equal to FRR. We determine the most successful methods of image processing to be used with eigenface based face recognition, in application areas such as security, surveillance, data compression and archive searching.
Z.: Face Recognition: A Comparison of Appearance-Based Approaches
- In Proc. VIIth Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications
, 2003
"... Abstract. We investigate the effect of image processing techniques when applied as a pre-processing step to three methods of face recognition: the direct correlation method, the eigenface method and fisherface method. Effectiveness is evaluated by comparing false acceptance rates, false rejection ra ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 11 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Abstract. We investigate the effect of image processing techniques when applied as a pre-processing step to three methods of face recognition: the direct correlation method, the eigenface method and fisherface method. Effectiveness is evaluated by comparing false acceptance rates, false rejection rates and equal error rates calculated from over 250,000 verification operations on a large test set of facial images, which present typical difficulties when attempting recognition, such as strong variations in lighting conditions and changes in facial expression. We identify some key advantages and determine the best image processing technique for each face recognition method. 1
POUR L'OBTENTION DU GRADE DE DOCTEUR ÈS SCIENCES PAR
"... 2010 to my wife, Joyce, and my family...- Résumé- ..."
Combining
"... multiple face recognition systems using Fisher’s linear discriminant ..."
(Show Context)