"... In PAGE 6: ... Among them we can list: a0 assign priority to rules a0 assign a precedence ordering among different rules (that may depend on the context of execution) a0 define an absolute ordering among categories of rules. As a first attempt, we consider the possibility of distin- guishing among different categories of rules, and in par- ticular, we group the rules of Table2 in three categories. The first, including A-I, G-I, and SG-I, is characterized by the introduction of a new node in the RHS graph.... ..."

"... In PAGE 6: ... Since this phenotype develops rather late in the life of these seedlings, it is likely that this is a secondary effect due to the lack, in these mutants, of inhibition of cell growth and proliferation normally provided by a functional SAM. Adventitious shoot formation by shoot meristemless tissue To ask whether stm-1 also affects adventitious shoot formation, root explants from stm-1 seedlings were grown in culture under conditions that promote shoot regeneration ( Table1 ). Wild-type and stm-1 explants both formed callus when placed on a callus inducing medium, and both tissues produced green nodules when transferred to shoot-inducing M.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ...estored. Notably, as Fig. 2 shows, 8-oxoG repair rate is more sensitive to small changes in protein kinetics than the steady- state repair capacity. Table3 summarizes the effect on BER capacity (steady-state number of lesions per cell on exposure to the formation of 2,000 8-oxoG/cell/d and 20,000 AP sites/cell/d) and BER kinetics (time to clear 10,000 8-oxoG and 100,000 AP sites) of each protein in the pathway with 10% and 50% of their normal (Table 1) kcat. Results are given for each of the activities of multiple-function proteins separately.... ..."

"... In PAGE 16: ...n Table 3.5 we compare the test (3.3) with the procedure proposed by Kulasekera and Wang (1997). For the sake of comparison we chosed the setup considered in Table3 of the latter paper, that is normally distributed errors with variance 2 = 0:5 and the following regression functions (a) g1(x) = ?g2(x) = 0:5 cos(2 x) (b) g1(x) = ?g2(x) = 0:5 sin(2 x) (c) g1(x) = g2(x) ? x = cos( x) (3.10) (d) g1(x) = g2(x) ? 1 = cos( x) (e) g1(x) = g2(x) ? x = cos(2 x) (f) g1(x) = g2(x) ? 1 = cos(2 x): Comparing the results of Table 3.... In PAGE 16: ...10) (d) g1(x) = g2(x) ? 1 = cos( x) (e) g1(x) = g2(x) ? x = cos(2 x) (f) g1(x) = g2(x) ? 1 = cos(2 x): Comparing the results of Table 3.5 with the corresponding results of Kulasekera and Wang apos;s (1997) in Table3 of their paper we observe that the test proposed in this paper yields a substantial improvement with respect to the power in all considered cases. Note that Kulasekera and Wang (1997) chosed the bandwidths such that the power is maximized (at the cost of a simulated level) and we could obtain a further improvement in power for the test (3.... In PAGE 19: ...Table3 in Hall and Hart (1990). The test proposed by these authors depends on a smoothing parameter p and Table 3 in Hall and Hart (1990) lists results for three choices of p: More precisely the errors are given by (3.... In PAGE 19: ...proposed by these authors depends on a smoothing parameter p and Table3 in Hall and Hart (1990) lists results for three choices of p: More precisely the errors are given by (3.11) and the alternatives by g1 ? g2 = 1 and (g1 ? g2)(x) = x where g2 = 0: The results are given in Table 3.... In PAGE 19: ...able 3.8. Simulated rejection probabilities of the test (3.3) in the scenario considered by Hall and Hart (1990), Table3 . The design is uniform [according to (3.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ... The effi- ciency of the RNAi knockdown was determined by reverse transcription and real-time PCR analysis 2 d post-knockdown. As seen in Table1 A, the transfection of CENPC1-85, -86, and -87 RNAi oligonucleotides into cells resulted in a reduction of CENPC1 RNA level by 41.... In PAGE 10: ...construct increased the cell growth by 18.5%, whereas the mu- tated construct was incapable of restoring the detrimental effects of the CENPC1 RNAi knockdown ( Table1 B). These results pro- vided evidence for the functional significance of the CENPC1 NoLS domain.... ..."

"... In PAGE 13: ... Depending on the gesture commands are sent to the devices and feedback is applied. The correlation of gestures and commands is shown in Table3 . If the dialogue nishes by time out or by the pointing gesture or a certain termination gesture the control ow enters the direction determination (Figure 12).... In PAGE 30: ...evice at a time. First a device is selected by the unique pointer click. Depending on the selected device, the gesture will execute a certain command. Table3 shows a possible mapping. The stars indicate that the device in that column supports the function of the row.... ..."