Results 1 - 10
of
37,329
Table 5: Results on unsupervised learning
"... In PAGE 7: ...(27). The results are given in Table5 . For 4 out of 7 datasets, the accuracy values are improved.... ..."
Table 3: Comparisons for supervised methods Although the SGNT/SGNN method was mainly developed for the purpose of unsupervised learning and the class information is only used to assign weights to the attributes (never used in training process), Table 3 shows that the performance of SGNT is still quite impressive. The speed comparisons in Table 4 show again the SGNT method is much faster than any other methods for supervised learning. The time spent by calculating the rst and second order information gains for all three MONK apos;s problems are the same, 0.2 second, and is not included in the training time given in Table 4.
"... In PAGE 4: ...0% Reich amp; Fisher Table 1: Accuracy comparisons for unsupervised learning methods the harder task M2, the performance of SGNT is much better than the others and so is the average performance of SGNT. Actually, the performance of SGNT for the harder problem is even better than many popular supervised learning methods (see Table3 ). As for the training speed, SGNT is signi cantly faster than its competitors.... ..."
Table 3. Committee-Based Unsupervised Learning
"... In PAGE 6: ... The classifiers were then retrained using the labeled seed corpus plus the new training material collected automatically during the previous step. In Table3 we show the results from these unsupervised learning experiments for two confusion sets. In both cases we gain from unsupervised training compared to using only the seed corpus, but only up to a point.... ..."
Table 3. Unsupervised learning result on CUCS dataset
2004
"... In PAGE 17: ...Table3 . We used an unclustered single-length model since the number of training examples is sufficient to adequately model normal traffic.... ..."
Cited by 107
Table 4.10. Effect of Unsupervised Learning
2006
Table 2: Accuracy comparisons for unsupervised learning methods.
"... In PAGE 15: ...% misclassi cations, i.e. noise in the training set. The comparison results on predictive accuracy is shown in Table2 . CLASSWEB is a combination of the algorithms COBWEB [Fisher, 1987] and CLASSIT [Gennari et al.... ..."
TABLE I GA AND PSO PARAMETERS FOR UNSUPERVISED LEARNING
Table 2: Experimental results comparing unsupervised learning of network structure.
1996
"... In PAGE 8: ... This procedure is un- supervised, it does not distinguish the class variable from other variables in the domain.4 Table2 contains the results of this experiment: unsup(LS) denotes the unsupervised learning method described in Section 4.3, where the initial discretization was performed by least square quantization as described in Section 4.... ..."
Cited by 43
Table 2: Experimental results comparing unsupervised learning of network structure.
1996
"... In PAGE 8: ... This procedure is un- supervised, it does not distinguish the class variable from other variables in the domain.4 Table2 contains the results of this experiment: unsup(LS) denotes the unsupervised learning method described in Section 4.3, where the initial discretization was performed by least square quantization as described in Section 4.... ..."
Cited by 43
Results 1 - 10
of
37,329