Results 1 - 10
of
9,899
Table 1: Quantitative analysis of the detection/tracking modules
2001
"... In PAGE 4: ... Although it is difficult to quantitatively evaluate this type of system, we sum- marize in table 1 some values having a clear decisive relevance to the video surveillance. Table1 shows a summary of the output of the detec- tion and tracking module. The numerical values rep- resent the outputs obtained at different stages of the processing.... ..."
Cited by 38
Table 1: Quantitative analysis of the detection/tracking modules
1998
"... In PAGE 4: ... This scalar value allows us to discard detected blobs which are due to misregistrationof the motioncompen- sation algorithm, since these regions have no temporal coherence which is characterized by a small length. Table1 gives some results obtained over several set of video streams acquired by the Predator UAV and VSAM platforms. These video streams represent a va- riety of scenes involving human activity (see figures 1 and 3), and were used to evaluate the performance of our system.... ..."
Cited by 6
Table 1: Fast and robust vision detection/tracking modules
Table 1: Results of the tracking: experiment, the number of switches between motion tracking (MT) module and motion detection (MD) module, the number of images tracked, and the amount of images in percent in which the distance of the center of gravity from the middle of the image is less than 5, 10, 20 pixels
1995
"... In PAGE 17: ....e. all possible changes of the contour of the train { based on the di erent viewing angles { and directions of motion could be recorded. In Table1 the results of the experiments are shown.In experiment 9 at the beginning of the experiment the moving object is not in the eld of view of the camera.... In PAGE 18: ... In all of the images the moving train is kept in the middle of the image. In column 2 of Table1 the stability of the automatic initialization and tracking with the active contour can be seen. A switch to the motion detection module will be done in the case of an error in the tracking module or after the automatic initialization.... ..."
Cited by 8
Table 3: Number of tracks required for 100% CGE detailed routing using the three types of switch modules (FS = 3).
"... In PAGE 6: ... The quality of a switch module was evaluated by the area performance of the CGE detailed router. Table3 shows the results. For the results listed in this table, we rst deter- mined the minimum number of tracks W and then the small- est connection-module exibility FC required for 100% routing completion for each circuit, using the three kinds of switch modules.... In PAGE 6: ... Our experimental results show that, among the three kinds of switch modules, the universal switch modules usu- ally achieve the best area performance, and the XC4000-type ones often have the worst performance. Though not presented in Table3 , the results based on various FC apos;s are highly con- sistent with this phenomenon. Note that the architectures of the universal and the anti-symmetric switch modules are alike (see Figures 8 and 10); however, as mentioned earlier, the anti- symmetric ones are still not universal.... ..."
TABLE 1. Number of Cells Classified in Each Category of Behavioral Correlation and Significant Hippocampal Theta Rhythm Phase Modulation for Cells Recorded During Both the Linear Track and Muli-Environment Foraging Task
2005
Cited by 1
Table 2.2: Silicon tracker module misalignments which cause a degradation of no more than 20% in the resolution of the track parameters compared to the perfectly aligned detector [10].
2004
Table 2. Detector modules used in the beam test
"... In PAGE 3: ... 2): 3 modules, ATT2, ATT4, and UCSC2, to be tested (DUT=device-under-test) and 2 modules, UCSC1 and LBIC2, to define a beam particle track (anchor planes). The module data are summarized in Table2 . The non-irradiated detector module was UCSC2 and the irradiated detector module was ATT4.... ..."
Table 2. Detector modules used in the beam test
"... In PAGE 3: ... 2): 3 modules, ATT2, ATT4, and UCSC2, to be tested (DUT=device-under-test) and 2 modules, UCSC1 and LBIC2, to define a beam particle track (anchor planes). The module data are summarized in Table2 . The non-irradiated detector module was UCSC2 and the irradiated detector module was ATT4.... ..."
Table 2 Sensor dimensions, module locations on the disks, their tolerances and rf overlap between neighbouring modules
in The ATLAS
"... In PAGE 13: ... A given ring has alternating high and low modules with an overlap between neighbours that provides the required hermeticity and allows for the relative alignment of the modules within the same ring using tracks that hit both modules. This overlap in rf determines the tolerances in positioning the module in that direction and these tolerances are different depending on the ring radius, as shown in Table2 [24]. Mechanical interference constraints require a clearance of 0.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
9,899