Tools
Sorted by:
Try your query at:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 1 - 10
of
31,054
Table 8 Maximum observed size and minimum legal size for five species of-abalone*.
2001
Table 1. The subjects under study # subject sex age state group tests
"... In PAGE 8: ... A more detailed description of the method is given elsewhere (Pompe, this volume). We have calculated the GMI function for each of the 132 bivariate records (x; y) of Table1 . In Fig.... ..."
Table 1. The subjects under study # subject sex age state group tests
Table 4: Simple main effect of difference of dialog state. Subject F ratio p Significance
"... In PAGE 12: ... Figure 5 shows the averages of R apos; with respect to each subject and dialog state. Table4 shows the significance of the simple main effect of the different dialog states. F ratio indicates the ratio to the chance fluctuation.... In PAGE 13: ... The results shown in Figure 4 indicate that the response times tend to increase at the dialog states S2 and S5, indicating that our method can be used to go one step further to compare dialog states or dialog patterns under the dual task conditions. Figure 5 and Table4 show the subject-ability effect. Our focus on the average response times was regarded as appropriate due to the significant differences observed among the different states, which are not obvious in the works of Kojima et.... ..."
Table 1: Examples of security provider packages; Providers marked with y are subject to export control in the United States of America.
Cited by 1
Table 1: Properties of studies of Audio-visual emotion recognition on posed emotions reference subject state classifier fusion test accuracy Zeng et al. [44] 20 11 MFHMM model i 83.64%
"... In PAGE 4: ...nd Huang [38][39], Yoshitomi et al. [40], De Silva and Ng [41]. In that past few years, there are an increasing number of reports investigating the integration of emotion-related information from audio and visual channels in order to improve the recognition performance. They are summarized in Table1 in which the first column is the reference, the second column is the number of subjects in datasets, the third column is the number of emotional states, the fourth column is classifier, and the fifth column is fusion method (feature-level, model-level, and decision-level), the sixth column is the test method (p: person-dependent; i: person-independent), and last column is recognition accuracy (%). * denotes the missing entry.... ..."
Cited by 1
TABLE 1 Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Schizophrenia and Healthy Comparison Subjects. Values are means (standard deviation) unless stated otherwise
2007
"... In PAGE 2: ... METHODS 2.1 Subjects The demographic and clinical characteristics of the 54 schizophrenia and 70 comparison subjects are summarized in TABLE1 . The majority of these subjects were included in prior studies of hippocampal and thalamic shape (Csernansky et al, 2002;2004).... ..."
Table 6: Time elapsed before first hypothesis is stated: 1-way betwen subjects ANOVA results
"... In PAGE 20: ... The Mixed condition was ranked next with a mean of 1162 seconds as compared to the Text condition with a mean time of 2433 seconds. The full results are presented in Table6 . The significance of this result is that early introduction of a hypothesis provides more opportunities for elaboration on and evaluation of the hypothesis, but also caries the danger of becoming fixated on a hypothesis.... ..."
Table 3. Average values of Doppler indexes and PDF parameters in one typical tilt table subject at three different preload states
in diastolic
2006
Results 1 - 10
of
31,054
