Results 1 - 10
of
33,453
Table 1 Departure models, basic specification (predicted probabilites)
2006
"... In PAGE 17: ... The departure models IV.1 The basic models The main departure model results are shown in Table1 . The findings are presented in probability space, as derived from the underlying logit models.... In PAGE 20: ... 11F0019MIE, no. 288 - 20 - Table1 Departure models, basic specification (predicted probabilites) (concluded) Men Women percent Baseline rate 0.061 ** 0.... In PAGE 22: ... What do the year patterns look like after the factors represented by the variables included in the models are taken account of? These are captured by the calendar year variables included in the models. The associated predicted probabilities shown in Table1 are also plotted in Figure 2. The raw and adjusted trends are in fact very similar.... In PAGE 24: ... 24. The other variables shown in Table1... ..."
Table 3 - Predictive Power Specification IV
"... In PAGE 10: ... Choice of explanatory variables follows Blau and Kahn (1981). Table 2 shows several specifications with corresponding predictive strength of the preferred specification IV reported in Table3 . An observation is predicted as quot;one quot; if the estimated probability is equal to or greater than 0.... ..."
Table 2. Specificity of predictions (based on the values given on the official evaluation website), rounded to full percentages
2005
"... In PAGE 6: ... While RosettaDOM, CONSENSUS and DOPRO find more native two-domain proteins, SSEP-Domain achieves the highest number of correct predictions for single-domain proteins together with InterProScan. Table2 shows the corresponding specificity values. With 82%, SSEP-Domain achieves the highest specificity on two-domain targets.... ..."
TABLE 6. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of selected clinical and laboratory abnormalities (all sites combined).
Table 1 A contingency table for the binary classification, where a specific prediction rule is invoked
Table 3: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of operon prediction. Predictor Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy
"... In PAGE 9: ...1759 We run 10-fold cross-validation experiments with those known WO and TUB pairs, and estimate the sensitivities, specificities and accuracies of five operon prediction methods, including three methods based on each individual type of genomic data and two joint prediction methods with equal weights or weights assigned by training a perceptron. The results are shown in Table3 . Our prediction method employing a perceptron achieves the highest accuracy up to 83.... ..."
Table 5: Phosphoprotein-putative protein kinase pairs with several phosphorylation sites attributed to the same kinase
2006
"... In PAGE 9: ... The phosphorylation events are carried out in order, with the Tyr phosphorylation occurring first, the Thr phospho- rylation occurring second [54]. In our dataset, the topoi- somerase-associated protein, Pat1p, has both Ser and Tyr phosphorylated in a SXY motif, which may be the result of MAPKK phosphorylation, or the S6K-like protein kinase Page 9 of 16 (page number not for citation purposes) the same protein ( Table5 ). Examples of such a kinase- substrate pair are CK1-Ede1p (discussed earlier) and CK1- Ynr047wp (family I_D), followed by MAPKK phosphor-... ..."
Table 3. Sensitivity and Specificity of Prediction by NetPhosK, Scansite, and Prosite of PKA phosphorylation sitesa NetPhosK Scansite Prosite
in Preface
"... In PAGE 28: ... Plk1 plays key roles during multiple stages of mitosis including prophase, anaphase, and cytokinesis [116]. It is involved in regulation of mitotic entry [144], chromosome segregation [145], centrosome maturation [146] and mitotic exit [147] (see Table3 for substrate examples). One function of Plk1 is regulation of mitotic entry, which strictly depends on activation of the M- phase-promoting factor consisting of Cdc2 and Cyclin B.... In PAGE 29: .... cerevisiae Cdc5 in a PBD-dependent manner [161]. However, the exact function of Plk1 at the central spindle is still unclear. SUBSTRATE GROUP PLK-BINDING PARTNER PLK PHOSPHORYLATION SITE G2/M phase Cell-division cycle -25 (Cdc25) Cyclin B1 Membrane-associated Cdk1-inhibitory kinase Myt1 Wee1 Yes Not determined Not determined Yes S198 S133, S147 S426, T495 Not determined M phase Stathmin/oncoprotein-18 Ninein-like protein (Nlp) Translationally controlled tumour protein (TCTP) Microtubule-associated protein-85 (Map85) Katanin Cohesin Not determined Yes Yes Not determined Not determined Not determined S16, S25, S39 S87/99, T161, S670, S686 S46, S64 Not determined Not determined S175, S263 Anaphase/telophase/cytokinesis Mitotic-kinesin-like protein-1 (Mklp1) Mitotic-kinesin-like protein-2 (Mklp2) Nuclear-distribution gene C (NudC) Yes Yes Yes Not determined S62, S528, S662, S668 S274, S326 Meiosis Recombinant-defective protein-8 (Rec8) Golgi-reassembly stacking protein-65 (GRASP65) Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C subunits) Not determined Yes Yes Not determined Not determined Many Table3 : Plk1 substrates and binding partners (modified from [122]). ... In PAGE 59: ...etPhosK, Scansite and Prosite is 40.6%, 66.7%, and 63.6, respectively ( Table3 ). It is concluded that NetPhosK is most efficient for prediction of PKA phosphorylation.... ..."
Results 1 - 10
of
33,453