Results 1 - 10
of
31,042
Table 1: Single Query Response Times (Seconds)
"... In PAGE 12: ...Table 1: Single Query Response Times (Seconds) Table1 contains the response times for the eleven benchmark queries for each of the three configurations. Figure 11 presents the performance of the Pre-Exec configuration relative to the base Base and Whole configurations.... ..."
Table 1: Single Query Response Times (Seconds)
"... In PAGE 12: ... The main memory buffer cache and disk cache were flushed between queries to insure that all queries were executed with cold buffer pools. Table1 contains the response times for the eleven benchmark queries for each of the three configurations. Figure 11 presents the performance of the Pre-Exec configuration relative to the base Base and Whole configurations.... ..."
Table 2. Responses to a single jolt stimulus.
Table 7: Structure of the Analysis of Variance Table, for Single Factor Response Surface Regression
"... In PAGE 19: ... In a similar fashion, a confidence interval for our estimate of can be defined by noting that the standardized value for b should be t-distributed: (71) where is the true value for , so that (72) Regression results should also be framed in an analysis of variance framework. In the simple one factor case, a simple ANOVA table might be as shown in Table7 . In this case, is the sum of squared values of the estimates, and is an estimate of the variance explained by the model, where our model is purely linear (no intercept term) as given in Eq.... ..."
Table 2 Set size as a function of item-type for the single- and dual-response norms (standard deviations).
"... In PAGE 13: ... Set size. Table2 presents mean set sizes for each item-type for both the earlier single- response norms and the present dual-response norms. Values for the latter norms are shown for the first response, the second response, and for pooled responses based on words common to the two responses.... In PAGE 13: ... Values for the latter norms are shown for the first response, the second response, and for pooled responses based on words common to the two responses. As shown in the first two columns of Table2 , mean set size for each item-type tended to be stable. For example, for small-strong items, set size averaged 5.... In PAGE 14: ...irst and second responses of the dual-response norms was even lower, r = .39. The reliability of the set size index was clearly higher for the first than for the second response. ___________________________ Insert Table2 about here ____________________________ Examination of the means shown in Table 2 suggested that the reason for the instability in the second response index could be traced to the increasing numbers of new words. The estimates of set size increased dramatically, particularly for small-strong items.... In PAGE 14: ...irst and second responses of the dual-response norms was even lower, r = .39. The reliability of the set size index was clearly higher for the first than for the second response. ___________________________ Insert Table 2 about here ____________________________ Examination of the means shown in Table2 suggested that the reason for the instability in the second response index could be traced to the increasing numbers of new words. The estimates of set size increased dramatically, particularly for small-strong items.... ..."
Table 4. The amount of data (in bytes) sent by the tested protocols in the single- request-response Deploy scenario
2003
"... In PAGE 5: ... There was no noticeable uctuation in the amount of data sent with di erent connections. The amounts of data sent in the Deploy scenario are shown in Table4 . There is more variation in the results than would be expected, especially concerning the amount of pure TCP packets.... ..."
Cited by 2
Table 6: Responses to open question: What is the single biggest concern about
Tables presenting decompositions of the response variable cannot be represented as a single
Table 6: Single request transactions: response time fractions spent in the concurrency control
2001
Cited by 2
Results 1 - 10
of
31,042