"... In PAGE 3: ... Class separability is set to be different between groups and so genes from the different groups have varying degree of importance to the process of classification. The result in Table1 , column Ran- king ahows that the Bayesian approach ranks the different groups successfully, a property which is important for guiding follow-up experiments and not available by filtering gene lists for shared gene names as, for example, used in (Hockley et al., 2006).... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... First, we sort the records in the data set by the rank value of F2. The results are shown in Table3 . The performance of F2 is then computed as the fraction of the records at the top of the table that belong to the minority class.... ..."

"... In PAGE 13: ... 5 RESULTS The main results of the paper are presented in Tables 2 and 3. In Table2 we report the value and ranking of all nine competing models under the RMSE, MAE and Theil-U while Table 3 presents the value and ranking under the four LINEX loss functions. From the examination of Table 2 we note that the RMSE statistic indicates that the SV model provides the most accurate forecasts while the GARCH(3,2) model ranks seconds.... In PAGE 13: ... In Table 2 we report the value and ranking of all nine competing models under the RMSE, MAE and Theil-U while Table 3 presents the value and ranking under the four LINEX loss functions. From the examination of Table2 we note that the RMSE statistic indicates that the SV model provides the most accurate forecasts while the GARCH(3,2) model ranks seconds. Despite its simplicity, the random walk model could sometimes offer very good forecasts within the univariate family.... ..."

"... In PAGE 39: ... The graph displays mean results of six runs performed on each size using each model. Table1 . Accuracy of parents found, as determined by rank in list of nearest neighbours.... ..."

"... In PAGE 4: ...Table2 presents the ranking of the numerals based on these distance. As expected, numerals like BG and BE figure at the top of the discriminatory ability list, while others like BD and BC are at the bottom of it.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... Therefore, nu- merals that are more discriminatory have a lower Bhat- tacharya distance. Table2 presents the ranking of the nu- merals based on these distance. As expected, numerals like a0 and a3 figure at the top of the discriminatory ability list, while others like a2 and a1 are at the bottom of it.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ... Se- lection from these rank tables can be achieved for instance by choosing all features on first rank position. Table2 gives an example of this 1rst order selection scheme. Obviously, for first rank position, feature 3 and 4 will be selected.... ..."