Tools
Sorted by:
Try your query at:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Results 1 - 10
of
55,824
Table 8.7. Effect of Learning on Individual Utilities at Different Levels of Perceived Power. Individual Utility Perceived
Table 8.7. Effect of Learning on Individual Utilities at Different Levels of Perceived Power. Individual Utility Perceived
Table 3 Perceived Success Scores
"... In PAGE 12: ... Respondents rated these questions on an 8-point, Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (not at all successful) to 8 (fully successful). As shown in Table3 , all the projects were rated at least modestly successful, with compos- ite success scores ranging from a low of 4.... ..."
Table 8.6. Distances to Nash of Imbalanced Power Agreements. Balanced versus Distance to Nash t-test
Table 8.3. Individual Utilities for the Power-and-No-Learning Environment. Perceived Power Individual Utility
Table 8.8. Individual Utilities for Three Levels of Power in Learning Environment. Perceived Power Individual Utility
Table 1: Perceived loss rate for various FEC schemes
1998
"... In PAGE 8: ... To each combination of main and redundant information we can as- sociate a cost (we briefly discussed bandwidth and storage cost above) and a perceived loss rate, which is the loss rate after reconstructing the missing packets using the redun- dant information. Table1 shows preliminary measures of perceived loss rates for a few combinations measured from INRIA to UCL and LBL. As expected, adding redundant... ..."
Cited by 47
Table 1: Perceived loss rate for various FEC schemes
"... In PAGE 8: ... To each combination of main and redundant information we can as- sociate a cost (we briefly discussed bandwidth and storage cost above) and a perceived loss rate, which is the loss rate after reconstructing the missing packets using the redun- dant information. Table1 shows preliminary measures of perceived loss rates for a few combinations measured from INRIA to UCL and LBL. As expected, adding redundant... ..."
Table 19. Mean Rating of Constraints or Barriers as Perceived by Respondents
2000
"... In PAGE 65: ... These ranged from 1 for not at all important , 2 for not very important , 3 for somewhat important , 4 for important , to 5 for very important . Table19 illustrates the mean rating of constraints or barriers. The number of responses to each factor has been included in the table to account to the reader for non-response in each category.... ..."
Table 3. Mean ratings of perceived usefulness of computer technology
2007
Cited by 1
Results 1 - 10
of
55,824
