• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 5,898
Next 10 →

Table 1 Comparison of Picture Library Search Parameters

in unknown title
by unknown authors

Table 4 shows the corresponding average and worst case decoding times (in # cycles) for the three types of pictures, and also the worst case and average decoding time considering all picture types (given on the last row of the table).

in Hierarchical algorithms for assessing probabilistic constraints on system performance
by G. De Veciana, M. Jacome, Jian-huei Guo 1997
"... In PAGE 12: ...866 / 8.011 Table4 : Average and worst case decoding times, in # cycles for I,P and B frames. below the target of 33.... In PAGE 12: ...ption 2. The bottom part of Fig. 4 shows the decoding time distributions for I, P, and B pictures for the new design. Table4 shows the resulting average and worst case picture decoding delays for the three types of pictures, and also the worst case and average decoding delays for all picture types. The maximum combinatorial delay was determined to be 46 ns, using the same standard-cell library, thus leading to an average decoding delay per picture of 31.... In PAGE 12: ...5 ms. Note, however, that the (relative) gap between the average and the worst case delays for Option 2 has increased significantly with respect to that for Option 1 (see last row of Table4 ). Indeed, in the Option 2 design we have increased the decoder performance by introducing some parallelism in the IDCT, PI, and PA Modules.... ..."
Cited by 3

Table 4 shows the corresponding average and worst case decoding times (in # cycles) for the three types of pictures, and also the worst case and average decoding time considering all picture types (given on the last row of the table).

in Hierarchical Algorithms for Assessing Probabilistic Constraints on System Performance
by Veciana Jacome, G. De Veciana, M. Jacome, Jian-huei Guo 1997
"... In PAGE 12: ...866 / 8.011 Table4 : Average and worst case decoding times, in # cycles for I,P and B frames. below the target of 33.... In PAGE 12: ...ption 2. The bottom part of Fig. 4 shows the decoding time distributions for I, P, and B pictures for the new design. Table4 shows the resulting average and worst case picture decoding delays for the three types of pictures, and also the worst case and average decoding delays for all picture types. The maximum combinatorial delay was determined to be 46 ns, using the same standard-cell library, thus leading to an average decoding delay per picture of 31.... In PAGE 12: ...5 ms. Note, however, that the (relative) gap between the average and the worst case delays for Option 2 has increased significantly with respect to that for Option 1 (see last row of Table4 ). Indeed, in the Option 2 design we have increased the decoder performance by introducing some parallelism in the IDCT, PI, and PA Modules.... ..."
Cited by 3

(Table 1.3) can be relatively big and complicated. The tables illustrate the dependence of the accuracy of retrieval task on the quality of the index. It is hard to say whether any of the videos shown in personal video cataloque will contain pictures about pyramids. The situation is slightly better in the case of a library index because it tells that specific tape will contain something about pyramids. However, because it does not contain the actual position of the pyramid in the tape, the only way to check where it occurs and what is being said about the pyramids is to watch entire document.

in Maximum Entropy Modeling and Semantic Concept Detection
by Janne Argillander, Professorship S, Instructor Dr. Giridharan Iyengar, Tekijä Janne Argillander 2005

Table 1: Library project topics Team Topic

in Software Requirements Negotiation: Some Lessons Learned
by Barry Boehm, Alexander Egyed 1998
"... In PAGE 1: ... Their client- driven, evolving nature made the set of projects more of an observatory than an experimental laboratory [4]. The projects (see Table1 ) focused on different forms of multimedia data like movies, books, manuscripts, pamphlets, pictures, papers, and so on. However, the project goals were diverse because requirements of an archive for technical reports for instance are quite different from those of an archive for medieval manuscripts.... ..."
Cited by 4

Table 1: Library project topics Team Topic

in Software Requirements Negotiation: Some Lessons Learned
by Barry Boehm , Alexander Egyed 1998
"... In PAGE 1: ... Their client- driven, evolving nature made the set of projects more of an observatory than an experimental laboratory [4]. The projects (see Table1 ) focused on different forms of multimedia data like movies, books, manuscripts, pamphlets, pictures, papers, and so on. However, the project goals were diverse because requirements of an archive for technical reports for instance are quite different from those of an archive for medieval manuscripts.... ..."
Cited by 4

Table 1 shows a quantitative picture of reuse. The design of EmStar services has followed the dictum encapsulate mechanism, not policy . This approach encour- ages reuse, and reduces system complexity while maintain- ing simple interfaces between modules. EmStar implements modules as independent processes rather than as libraries, eliminating a wide variety of unanticipated interactions, thus better controlling complexity as the number of modules in- creases.

in Emstar: a software environment for developing and deploying wireless sensor networks
by Lewis Girod, Jeremy Elson, Alberto Cerpa, Thanos Stathopoulos, Nithya Ramanathan, Deborah Estrin 2004
"... In PAGE 13: ... Table1 : Reuse statistics culled from LXR. 5.... ..."
Cited by 90

Table 1 shows a quantitative picture of reuse. The design of EmStar services has followed the dictum encapsulate mechanism, not policy . This approach encour- ages reuse, and reduces system complexity while maintain- ing simple interfaces between modules. EmStar implements modules as independent processes rather than as libraries, eliminating a wide variety of unanticipated interactions, thus better controlling complexity as the number of modules in- creases.

in Emstar: a software environment for developing and deploying wireless sensor networks
by Lewis Girod, Jeremy Elson, Alberto Cerpa, Thanos Stathopoulos, Nithya Ramanathan, Deborah Estrin 2004
"... In PAGE 13: ... Table1 : Reuse statistics culled from LXR. 5.... ..."
Cited by 90

Table 12. Service Description Matrices of the EMMA Multimedia Library Service

in Farkas Károly
by Consultants Dr. Tamás Henk, Gergely Záruba, István Cselényi, Telia Confidental 1998
"... In PAGE 8: ...MMA Tele-University Service ......................................................................................49 Table12 .... In PAGE 54: ...he rule set. The media belonging to different priority levels are drawn separately. d Visitor Data Database mandatory media Priority level 1: p Visitor Picture Database v Visitor Video Database optional media optional media a Visitor Audio Database t Visitor Text Database optional media optional media Priority level 2: Figure 14. Session Configuration of the EMMA Multimedia Library Service The session request has to be checked and the service description matrices and vectors are generated ( Table12 ). The size of these matrices are much friendlier than the matrices in the previous example because of the simplicity of the service.... ..."

Table 2. Picture Legend

in Experimental Analysis of Heterogeneous Wireless Networks
by Giulio Iannello, Antonio Pescape, Giorgio Ventre, Luca Vollero 2004
Cited by 3
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 5,898
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University