### Table 2. Number of OEO modules and wavelength-links obtained by LOH and TSH in NET-B.

"... In PAGE 9: ...5-hour upper limit on the running time of both heuristics. Table2 shows the results of LOH and TSH under nine representative network settings. The #W and #R columns are the number of wavelengths on each link and the number of connection requests.... In PAGE 9: ... Figure 8 plots the solution traces of the objective value versus the running time for LOH and TSH. The solution traces are obtained from our experiment case 6 in Table2 and provide the information about how the heuristics improve the initial solution. Both heuristics stop before the 5400-second time limit.... In PAGE 9: ... These observations explain why TSH outperforms LOH. The solution traces for all other experiment cases in Table2 have similar trace patterns. 14 18 19 21 0 1 2 4 3 11 23 150 120 100 130 120 150 100 100 110 130 110 250 210 200 120 220 120 130 190 150 150 300 200 100 100 170 150 130 140 150 100 100 130 100 100 160 100 100 120 130 150 100 5 7 6 8 10 15 16 17 12 9 22 20 13 100 Figure 6.... In PAGE 10: ... The higher the sharing rate, the more OEO modules or wavelength links are saved. Table 3 shows the sharing rates for OEO modules and wavelength-links in percentage for the nine experiment cases in Table2 . Both the LOH and TSH approaches have high sharing rates.... In PAGE 10: ... In this subsection, we present experimental results to show how varying system parameters affect the solutions, and how our solution approaches handle such variation. Figure 9 shows the network resource usage of the solution for the case 9 in Table2 using the TSH approach. In five experiments (the results of each are represented by a set with two bars in Figure 9), we use different fiber dispersion factor (D_pmd), EDFA saturated grain (G), or receiver optical bandwidth (BO).... ..."

### Table 2. Cut-off of models by size

2002

Cited by 6

### Table 7. Effect of cutoffs for word bigram

1999

Cited by 1

### Table 4. Effect of feature selection with 90% cutoff

"... In PAGE 7: ...From the far right column (Mean) of Table4 , there appears to be an overall positive effect of the feature selection, compared to Table 3. However, in the topic-independent set, the performance of the significant categories (i.... ..."

### Table 4: Cutoff size and unit example

2004

"... In PAGE 42: ...Table 3: Which summary is more coherent? U1 U2 U3 U4 Result T1 M1 M2 - - M1(1),M2(1) T2 M1,M2 M1,M2 - - M1(2),M2(2) T3 M1,M2 M1,M2 - - M1(2),M2(2) T4 M1,M2 M1 - - M1(2),M2(1) T5 - - M1,M2 M1,M2 M1(2),M2(2) T6 - - M1,M2 M1,M2 M1(2),M2(2) T7 - - M1,M2 M1,M2 M1(2),M2(2) T8 - - M1 M1,M2 M1(2),M2(1) Table 12: Coherent information result table-analytic Table4 : Out of a scale from 1-5, where 5 is the best, what score would you assign to each summary? U1 U2 U3 U4 Total Result T1(M1) T1(M2) 4 3 3 2 - - - - 7 5 T2(M1) T2(M2) 5 4 5 4 - - - - 10 8 T3(M1) T3(M2) 5 3 5 4 - - - - 10 7 T4(M1) T4(M2) 5 3 5 4 - - - - 10 7 T5(M1) T5(M2) - - - - 4 3 5 4 9 7 T6(M1) T6(M2) - - - - 4 2 5 3 9 5 T7(M1) T7(M2) - - - - 5 4 4 3 9 7 T8(M1) T8(M2) - - - - 5 4 4 3 9 7 Table 13: 1-5 rating result table-analytic ... ..."