"... In PAGE 19: ...n Ore graph, we run a selected macro (e.g., is an uncle of ) and obtain as a result a network with the new relation (uncle) added to the list of already existing relations (by reading, only the relations spouse, father, and mother are generated). Sizes of Kinship Relations in Genealogies As an example, we took the five genealogies mentioned in previous sections and com- puted the sizes of their kinship relations ( Table6 ). We added the number of individuals in the bottom row.... ..."

"... In PAGE 18: ...rvar (in press). The fast sparse network multiplication was included in Pajek in April 2005. Basic Kinship Types Anthropologists typically use a basic vocabulary of kin types to represent genealogical relationships. One common version of the vocabulary for basic relationships (Fischer, 2005) is given in Table5 . At the bottom of the table, some derived relations are added (uncle, aunt, semisibling, grandparent, grandfather, and niece).... ..."

"... In PAGE 16: ...15. Table4 details this model, and the 9 cluster model explaining 89.... ..."

"... In PAGE 19: ... To make comparison easier, we normalized the numbers by the cardinality of the parent (or child) relation. The result is shown in Table7 . We can see that all obtained relations are sparse.... ..."

"... In PAGE 16: ... Also, in some cases the sex of the speaker matters, so that lower-case `m apos; #28male#29 or `f apos; #28female#29 begins the example description. Table4 shows KINSHIP apos;s conclusions, which are the same as those of #5B20#5D as retold by #5B19#5D. #28The English annotations, e.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ...ranslation may be said to be exact. But as a practical matter exact translation is rarely acheived. The reason for this is the problem of translation mismatch, which is discussed in next section. 2 Mismatch Table1 , adapted from Nirenberg #281987#29, illustrates some simple lexical mismatches between English and Russian taken from the domain of kinship terms, well-known for its richvariety cross-linguistically. Note, for example, that the English lexeme father-in-law collapses the Russian distinction between wife apos;s father and husband apos;s father.... In PAGE 3: ... form a technology partnership There is no waytohave the analogue of gijutsu men de #28with the technology aspect#29 modify the main verb as it can in Japanese. Table1 #28from Kay, et al. 1994#29 provides an example of what might be called conceptual mismatch, taken from the domain of bus and train travel.... ..."

"... In PAGE 14: ...7% of the variance in affiliation. The contribution made by lineage membership is greater than kinship, however (see the results of the regressions in Table4 ). In this case, the partial regression coefficient for lineage is nearly four times as large as kinship.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ... Namely, for each n there are network structures, which have equivalence classes of size 2n. A simple algorithm for counting the members of the Markov equivalence class is presented in Table1 . It is based on the following observations: 1.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ...005 for couples with females born 1800 to 1824 to 0.0005 for those born 1950 to 1965 ( Table1 ). This is equivalent to a change from couples being related on average between the level of third and fourth cousins to couples being related on average at the level of fifth cousins.... In PAGE 3: ... The outcome of this transition is an expansion of the pool of potential mates for con- temporary Icelanders, particularly those who are distantly related. Typically, this kind of demographic transition results in a drop in the average number of children per couple with time ( Table1 ). How- ever, this relationship is not monotonic for the Icelandic data (fig.... In PAGE 3: ... 1C). These results are based on couples born dur- ing a period of almost 200 years, in the course of which there was a marked decline both in the mean fertility and in kinship between couples ( Table1 ). Nonetheless, the same general relation- ship between kinship and reproductive outcome was observed within each 25-year subinterval (fig.... In PAGE 3: ... S5). Although Icelanders have experienced a socio- economic transformation from 1800 to the present (14, 15), accompanied by a reduction in family size and decreasing kinship between couples ( Table1 ), essentially the same relationship be- tween kinship and fertility was observed at the beginning and end of this 200-year period (fig. S2).... ..."