Results 1 - 10
of
102,718
Table 1. Long slit spectra.
1996
"... In PAGE 3: ...2. Spectroscopy Table1 summarizes the long slit spectra taken for this study. The format is as follows: Column 1) spectrum iden- ti cation; 2) date of observation; 3) spectral dispersion; 4) exposure time in seconds; 5) spectral range and 6) posi- tion angle of the slit in degrees.... ..."
Table 2. Zeropoint corrections (c7) for WFC observations taken after July 4, 2006 at the new operating temperature. These corrections were derived by computing the average dif- ference in the FLT aperture photometry (W3-W4) just prior to and immediately following cooldown and then subtracting the average aperture correction for each epoch (W3, W4 Apcor). The statistical error (c8) was computed by adding in quadrature the errors associ- ated with columns 4, 5, amp; 6. The filter exposure time (short, long) is given in c2 and impacts both the number of detected stars (c3) and the error.
2007
"... In PAGE 9: ... The positive excess beyond 3-sigma is due to larger numbers of hot pixels and cosmic rays in the 10 pixel aperture. The aperture corrections derived for each visit are listed in columns 4 amp; 5 of Table2 . Note that the aperture correction is con- sistently smaller in visit W4 compared to visit W3, reflecting real differences in the PSF encircled energy with time.... ..."
Table 1. Comparison of exposure modelling approaches in the target cities. Table 1. Comparison of exposure modelling approaches in the target cities.
2007
"... In PAGE 5: ... Accidental or other emer- gency releases may include a broad spectrum of harmful ra- dioactive, chemical, and biological species. The local approaches to exposure modelling in some of the target cities are compared in Table1 . Based on the com- putational technique the approaches are classified into prob- abilistic and deterministic; according to the selected type of modelling of population time-activity the latter can be further divided into statistical and individual sub categories.... In PAGE 14: ... Due to the focus of the Copenhagen system on emergency preparedness, calculation of the population exposure in ARGOS has considerable specifics. First, mostly potential radioactive releases are considered, thus the individual and collective doses for population exposure (corresponding to the deterministic-individual and deterministic-statistical approaches in Table1 ) are calculated for the acute phase and long-term effects. In a general sense the total doses to man for different groups of the population (e.... In PAGE 14: ... Due to the focus of the Copenhagen system on emergency preparedness, calculation of the population exposure in AR- GOS has considerable specifics. First, mostly potential ra- dioactive releases are considered, thus the individual and collective doses for population exposure (corresponding to the deterministic-individual and deterministic-statistical ap- proaches in Table1 ) are calculated for the acute phase and long-term effects. In a general sense the total doses to man for different groups of the population (e.... ..."
Table 1. Description of data sets
"... In PAGE 2: ... Our SUMER data were obtained for 5 days during the period of May 6 to July 28 in 1996 with relatively long exposure time. The observation dates, related observing settings, and parameters are listed in Table1 . These data contain lines from He I, C II, C IV, N IV, N V, O IV, O V, O VI, Mg X, Si II, Si IV, S I, NeV III ions or atoms.... ..."
TABLE 1 DETAILS OF THE EXPOSURE TIMES Exposure time (s)a
Table 5: Exposure Testing
2004
"... In PAGE 55: ....2.1 Exposure Results The first test that needed to be run was to determine the exposure time during the pho- tolithography process. This was done by taking five single silicon wafers and subjecting them to varying exposure times and preparatory measures as shown below in Table5 . All of the wafers used the same HMDS and PR spinning recipes.... In PAGE 56: ... The 7 second exposure also had smoother lines than the other wafers. Due to this, an exposure time of 7 seconds (Test Wafer #4 in Table5 ) was chosen along with baking the wafer after spinning on the HMDS layer. 4.... ..."
Table 2. List of observations of Cir X-1, including the archival AAT observations, the HST observation (June 1995), and our new AAT observation (June 1997). Column 2 gives the instrument/detectorcombinationwhere `B amp;C apos; indicates the Boller amp; Chivens spectrograph, `RGO apos; indicates the RGO spectrograph with either the long (82 cm) or short (25 cm) camera; columns 3{5 show the instrumental resolution, total exposure time, and orbital phase of the observation. The following columns show results of the t to the H line (see text for details), with gaussian 1 being the red-shifted (narrow) component, and gaussian 2 the blue-shifted (broad) component. The phase was calculated according the ephemeris of Stewart et al. (1991), and the ts are shown in Fig. 2. gaussian 1 gaussian 2 UT Date Instrument
"... In PAGE 3: ... Cir X-1 has been observed using the AAT several times by di erent observers, with most observations occurring about 20 years ago. We obtained spectra at a total of ve epochs which showed detectable emission: these are listed in Table2 and shown in Fig. 2.... In PAGE 4: ... Because of this, no attempt has been made to ux calibrate the spectra; instead, each spectrum was binned to a spectral sampling of two data points per resolution element, and the resulting spectrum was normalised by a low-order polynomial t to the spectrum. We performed the same double gaussian t to these spectra as described in Table 1, and the results are shown in Table2 . Several points are immediately clear: despite the wide range of orbital phases, the broad component is never observed redward of the narrow componenty.... In PAGE 5: ... We suspect that the broad component is related to the z Note that, if the narrow emission is arising from the heated face of the secondary, the equivalent width should vary in a smooth fashion through the binary orbit, with a maximum at phase 0.5; such a pattern is not seen in the data in Table2 . However, we argue that the mass transfer rate has varied so much over the 21 y spanned by the observations that it is misleading to try to compare the equivalent widths.... ..."
Table 1. Observing log
"... In PAGE 2: ... We used the 235mm camera, AgRed collima- tor, gratings R1200Y and H1800V and a TEK 1124x1124 CCD detector. For each star we give in Table1 the Prosser (1993) number and V-magnitude, date of the observation, dispersion (resolution 2 pixels), and exposure time. One of the stars was observed with the 3.... ..."
Table 3: Evaluation of the Exposure Time Calculator Module:
Table 2: Oven exposure time and temperature.
Results 1 - 10
of
102,718