• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 439
Next 10 →

Amortized Efficiency of List Update and Paging Rules

by Daniel D. Sleator, Robert E. Tarjan , 1985
"... In this article we study the amortized efficiency of the “move-to-front” and similar rules for dynamically maintaining a linear list. Under the assumption that accessing the ith element from the front of the list takes 0(i) time, we show that move-to-front is within a constant factor of optimum amo ..."
Abstract - Cited by 824 (8 self) - Add to MetaCart
In this article we study the amortized efficiency of the “move-to-front” and similar rules for dynamically maintaining a linear list. Under the assumption that accessing the ith element from the front of the list takes 0(i) time, we show that move-to-front is within a constant factor of optimum

Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abound: A new linear-threshold algorithm

by Nick Littlestone - Machine Learning , 1988
"... learning Boolean functions, linear-threshold algorithms Abstract. Valiant (1984) and others have studied the problem of learning various classes of Boolean functions from examples. Here we discuss incremental learning of these functions. We consider a setting in which the learner responds to each ex ..."
Abstract - Cited by 773 (5 self) - Add to MetaCart
be expressed as a linear-threshold algorithm. A primary advantage of this algorithm is that the number of mistakes grows only logarithmically with the number of irrelevant attributes in the examples. At the same time, the algorithm is computationally efficient in both time and space. 1.

Dynamic Planar Convex Hull Operations in Near-Logarithmic Amortized Time

by Timothy M. Chan - JOURNAL OF THE ACM , 1999
"... We give a data structure that allows arbitrary insertions and deletions on a planar point set P and supports basic queries on the convex hull of P , such as membership and tangent-finding. Updates take O(log 1+" n) amortized time and queries take O(log n) time each, where n is the maximum siz ..."
Abstract - Cited by 40 (6 self) - Add to MetaCart
We give a data structure that allows arbitrary insertions and deletions on a planar point set P and supports basic queries on the convex hull of P , such as membership and tangent-finding. Updates take O(log 1+" n) amortized time and queries take O(log n) time each, where n is the maximum

Amortized Supersampling

by Lei Yang, Diego Nehab, Pedro V. Sander, Pitchaya Sitthi-amorn, Jason Lawrence
"... We present a real-time rendering scheme that reuses shading samples from earlier time frames to achieve practical antialiasing of procedural shaders. Using a reprojection strategy, we maintain several sets of shading estimates at subpixel precision, and incrementally update these such that for most ..."
Abstract - Cited by 8 (2 self) - Add to MetaCart
We present a real-time rendering scheme that reuses shading samples from earlier time frames to achieve practical antialiasing of procedural shaders. Using a reprojection strategy, we maintain several sets of shading estimates at subpixel precision, and incrementally update these such that for most

Poly-logarithmic deterministic fully-dynamic graph algorithms I: connectivity and minimum spanning tree

by Jacob Holm, Kristian de Lichtenberg, Mikkel Thorup - JOURNAL OF THE ACM , 1997
"... Deterministic fully dynamic graph algorithms are presented for connectivity and minimum spanning forest. For connectivity, starting with no edges, the amortized cost for maintaining a spanning forest is O(log² n) per update, i.e. per edge insertion or deletion. Deciding connectivity between any two ..."
Abstract - Cited by 154 (7 self) - Add to MetaCart
given vertices is done in O(log n= log log n) time. This matches the previous best randomized bounds. The previous best deterministic bound was O( 3 p n log n) amortized time per update but constant time for connectivity queries. For minimum spanning trees, first a deletions-only algorithm

Amortized Complexity of Data Structures

by Rajamani Sundar , 1991
"... This thesis investigates the amortized complexity of some fundamental data structure problems and introduces interesting ideas for proving lower bounds on amortized complexity and for performing amortized analysis. The problems are as follows: ffl Dictionary Problem: A dictionary is a dynamic set t ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
that supports searches of elements and changes under insertions and deletions of elements. It is open whether there exists a dictionary data structure that takes constant amortized time per operation and uses space polynomial in the dictionary size. We prove that dictionary operations require log-logarithmic

kinetics with logarithmic time update

by Eric C. Dykeman , 2014
"... In this paper I outline a fast method called KFOLD for implementing the Gillepie algorithm to stochasti-cally sample the folding kinetics of an RNA molecule at single base-pair resolution. In the same fashion as the KINFOLD algorithm, which also uses the Gillespie algorithm to predict folding kineti ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
/deletion reactions and their corresponding rates do not change between each step in the algo-rithm. This allows KFOLD to achieve a substantial speed-up in the time required to compute a predic-tion of the folding pathway and, for a fixed number of base-pair moves, performs logarithmically with se-quence size

Orienting Fully Dynamic Graphs with Worst-Case Time Bounds

by Tsvi Kopelowitz, Robert Krauthgamer, Ely Porat, Shay Solomon , 2014
"... In edge orientations, the goal is usually to orient (direct) the edges of an undirected network (modeled by a graph) such that all outdegrees are bounded. When the network is fully dynamic, i.e., admits edge insertions and deletions, we wish to maintain such an orientation while keeping a tab on th ..."
Abstract - Cited by 2 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
-degree and a logarithmic amortized update time for all graphs with constant arboricity, which include all planar and excluded-minor graphs. It remained an open question – first proposed by Brodal and Fagerberg, later by Erickson and others – to obtain similar bounds with worst-case update time. We address

Solving online feasibility problem in constant amortized time per update

by Lilian Buzer , 2005
"... We present a deterministic algorithm for solving the two and three-dimensional online feasibility problem. Insertion of a new constraint is processed in constant amortized time. Our method is adapted from the offline linear deterministic Megiddo algorithm for linear programming. As in his prune an ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
We present a deterministic algorithm for solving the two and three-dimensional online feasibility problem. Insertion of a new constraint is processed in constant amortized time. Our method is adapted from the offline linear deterministic Megiddo algorithm for linear programming. As in his prune

Logarithmic-Time Updates and Queries in Probabilistic Networks

by Arthur Delcher, Adam Grove, Simon Kasif, Judea Pearl - Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 1995
"... Traditional databases commonly support efficient query and update procedures that operate in time which is sublinear in the size of the database. Our goal in this paper is to take a first step toward dynamic reasoning in probabilistic databases with comparable efficiency. We propose a dynamic data s ..."
Abstract - Cited by 23 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Traditional databases commonly support efficient query and update procedures that operate in time which is sublinear in the size of the database. Our goal in this paper is to take a first step toward dynamic reasoning in probabilistic databases with comparable efficiency. We propose a dynamic data
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 439
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University