### Table 2 The efficiency of the algorithm

"... In PAGE 6: ... The sim- ulation method is the same as above and the degree of false alarm is equal to 5%. The discord detection rates from the simulation and analytical model are shown in Table2 . Notice that they are very close, which verifies the effectiveness of the proposed model.... ..."

### Table 2. Computational Efficiencies of the Algorithms

### Table 1. Comparison of quality and efficiency of algorithms

### Table 1: Algorithm Efficiency

1991

Cited by 2

### Table 1: Efficiency for tested algorithms.

### Table 1: The most efficient algorithms achieving the mentioned local consistencies.3

"... In PAGE 7: ... The formal definitions of the local consistencies studied in this paper are presented in Figure 1. Table1 recalls the time and space complexities of the most efficient algorithms enforcing them. The worst case time complexity of SAC1, SRPC1, and NIC1 have not been proved to be optimal.... ..."

### Table IX . TIMINGS AND ALGORITHM EFFICIENCY

1996

### Table 3: Time Efficiency of the 5 Algorithms

2005

"... In PAGE 6: ...Table3 shows time efficiencies of the algorithms, where significant differences are clearly demonstrated. The most efficient algorithm, PLOFS+ES, only requires about 1 or 2 minutes.... ..."

Cited by 1

### Table 4. The comparison of the efficiencies of 4 algorithms

2003

"... In PAGE 13: ...400 349.3 1202.9 226.1 239.7 In Table4 , heading NumOfDoc is the number of the documents for tests. The values in other columns represent times in seconds spent on testing by different algorithms.... ..."

Cited by 3

### Table A-1 a Some relative numerical efficiencies of the algorithm for various parameters

1999

Cited by 2