• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Tools

Sorted by:
Try your query at:
Semantic Scholar Scholar Academic
Google Bing DBLP
Results 1 - 10 of 71,679
Next 10 →

Table 1. Comparison of QoS architectures

in A Survey of QoS Architectures
by Cristina Aurrecoechea, Andrew T. Campbell, Linda Hauw

Table 5 - Comparison of centralized system and de-centralized system. Centralized system De-centralized system

in Decentralized Ad-Hoc Groupware Api And Framework For Mobile Collaboration
by Wei-Hsing (dan) Lee, Wei-hsing (dan Lee 2000

Table 1. Distinctions Among Electronic Health Information Systems17 Distinguishing Feature Example Decentralized versus Centralized Decentralized: New England Health EDI Network (NEHEN) Centralized: Medicare Health Care Quality Improvement Program (MHCQIP)

in unknown title
by unknown authors

Table 3. Cost sheet for the decentralized vari- ant (System Architecture viewpoint) Viewpoint System architecture (decentralized) Actor

in Vrije Universiteit- Vuture.net
by Jaap Gordijn, De Boelelaan A
"... In PAGE 7: ... Note that the database server(s) and the message server are not part of the business value and process model, so their impact on the costs cannot be assessed by evaluating a business value or process model in isolation. Table3 and Table 4 show costs for the scenario submit ad for all actors (except contact searchers). For the submit ad scenario, 4 paths can be identified (paths 1,2 for ads which are published and locally or remotely checked, paths 3,4 for ads which are rejected and locally or remotely checked).... ..."

Table 3: Performance comparison: Centralized Parallel Scheduler vs. Balanced GPGP Coordination and Decentralized DTT Scheduler

in Designing a Family of Coordination Algorithms
by Keith S. Decker, Victor R. Lesser 1995
"... In PAGE 16: ... The centralized scheduler also starts with a global view of the entire episode. Table3 shows the results for all four measured criteria by summarizing within-block (paired-response) comparisons. For total final quality and number of deadlines missed, better simply refers to an episode where the algorithm in question had a greater total final quality or missed fewer deadlines, respectively.... ..."
Cited by 188

Table 1. The Degree of Decentralization of the Federal Central Bank Systems

in unknown title
by unknown authors
"... In PAGE 3: ... As is commonly known, the Bundesbank was perceived as the role model for the design of the ESCB. The relatively size of the total staff and the economics and research staff of the ESCB (ECB and the national central banks) and the staffing of the Federal Reserve System (Board of Governors and Federal Reserve Banks)8 and the Deutsche Bundesbank (Directorate and Landeszentralbanken) are reproduced in Table1 . From Table 1 it is quite evident that the trimming down of both the total staffing (almost 16000 employees) and the economics and research staffing (more than 200 employees) of the whole Bundesbank, in particular at the regional Landeszentralbanken, is just a matter of time.... ..."

Table 1. Block decentralized pairings for ALSTOM gasifier system

in Closed Loop Properties and Block Relative Gain
by Vinay Kariwala, J. Fraser Forbes, Edward S. Meadows 2004
Cited by 1

Table A-2 - Baseline Tax System - Decentralized 30% Income Tax

in including © notice, is given to the source. Why World Redistribution Fails
by Wojciech Kopczuk, Joel Slemrod, Shlomo Yitzhaki, Wojciech Kopczuk, Joel Slemrod, Shlomo Yitzhaki, Jel No. F, Joel Slemrod, Wojciech Kopczuk, Shlomo Yitzhaki 2002

Table A-2 - Baseline Tax System - Decentralized 30% Income Tax

in including © notice, is given to the source. Why World Redistribution Fails
by Wojciech Kopczuk, Joel Slemrod, Shlomo Yitzhaki, Wojciech Kopczuk, Joel Slemrod, Shlomo Yitzhaki, Jel No. F, Joel Slemrod, Wojciech Kopczuk, Shlomo Yitzhaki 2002

Table 2: trust coordination game

in Draft: not for citation Cyber-trust
by Jonathan Cave, Lorenzo Valeri
"... In PAGE 2: ...rom trustworthiness. Some aspects are summarised in Table 1. Table 1: Trust and trusting Trusted Party People Systems Organisations People Societal trust Agency, privacy, accuracy Reputation, Assurance Systems Fault-tolerance Complex system reliability N/A Trusting party Organisations Agency Reliance Firm networking From this, it follows that an appropriate distribution of trust (analogous to a distribution of risk) may be preferred to maximising trust (concentrating risk) as indicated in Table 2. Table2 : Advantages of matching trust behaviour Trustworthy Untrustworthy Trusting Appropriate delegation, specialisation Enforcement costs, costs of adverse incidents Untrusting Excess contracting, monitoring costs; race-to-the-bottom. Lost gains from trade, inappropriate risk allocation This view of trust concentrates on trust as activity and overlooks the way societal institutions embody aspects of trust.... ..."
Next 10 →
Results 1 - 10 of 71,679
Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University