"... In PAGE 9: ... Value consistency has been approached by data edits, through checking constraints at attribute level and merging the corresponding measures to compute the consistency at data source level. Table4 shows direction, the nature of the assessment, their corresponding ... ..."

"... In PAGE 17: ... 1.5 EXISTING REFERENCES Table1 -1 presents a list of all of the references that were reviewed as part of this DQO scoping process, as well as a summary of the pertinent information contained within each reference. These references were the primary source for the background information presented in Section 1.... In PAGE 17: ...6. Table1 -1. Existing References.... In PAGE 18: ...Rev. 0 1-5 Table1 -1. Existing References.... In PAGE 19: ... The 105-F FSB, located on the south side of the 105-F Reactor building, served as an underwater collection, storage, and transfer facility for irradiated fuel elements discharged from the reactor. Table1 -2 identifies the different rooms and areas comprising the 105-F FSB complex. Table 1-2.... In PAGE 19: ... Table 1-2 identifies the different rooms and areas comprising the 105-F FSB complex. Table1 -2. Elements of the 105-F FSB Complex.... In PAGE 20: ...Rev. 0 1-7 Table1 -2. Elements of the 105-F FSB Complex.... In PAGE 21: ... Project planning began to remove the fill material and recover any fuel rods in these FSBs. Several plans and reports were prepared (see Table1 -1). Two characterization efforts were made as part of the removal projects.... In PAGE 22: ... These tables also identify the organization that each DQO Team member or key decision maker represents, as well as their technical area of expertise and telephone number. Table1 -3. DQO Team Members.... In PAGE 23: ...Rev. 0 1-10 Table1 -3. DQO Team Members.... In PAGE 23: ... DQO Team Members. (2 pages) Name Organization Role and Responsibility Telephone Number Grant Ceffalo BHI/RadCon Radiological Engineer/Survey Design 373-6238 Dave Blumenkranz CHI/DEG Survey Design 372-9658 Roy Bauer CHI/EEG DQO Development Support 372-9622 Wendy Thompson BHI/SAC Sampling and Field Measurements 372-9487 Pam Doctor BHI/NRR Review of Sampling Design, Statistician 372-9107 Table1 -4. DQO Key Decision Makers.... In PAGE 24: ...Rev. 0 1-11 Table1 -5. Project Budget and Contractual Vehicles.... In PAGE 24: ... DWP = detailed work plan ERC = Environmental Restoration Contractor 1.9 PROJECT MILESTONE DATES Table1 -6 presents the milestone dates for the completion of all of the project activities associated with the development and implementation of the sampling program, the performance of laboratory analyses, the performance of a data quality assessment, and the evaluation and reporting of investigation results. Table 1-6.... In PAGE 24: ...9 PROJECT MILESTONE DATES Table 1-6 presents the milestone dates for the completion of all of the project activities associated with the development and implementation of the sampling program, the performance of laboratory analyses, the performance of a data quality assessment, and the evaluation and reporting of investigation results. Table1 -6. Project Milestone Dates.... In PAGE 25: ...10.1 Total List of Contaminants of Potential Concern Table1 -7 identifies all of the COPCs for each of the waste streams expected to be generated within each functional area of the facility. The waste streams are numbered for tracking purposes.... In PAGE 25: ... These waste stream numbers do not represent waste code numbers. Table1 -7. Total List of COPCs for Each Waste Stream.... In PAGE 25: ...ssociated COPCs are addressed by concurrent activities (i.e., under a separate SAP or waste management plan), these waste streams/associated COPCs may be excluded from further consideration from this DQO. Table1 -8 presents a list of the COPCs that are being removed from the total list of COPCs for this reason. Table 1-8.... In PAGE 25: ... Table 1-8 presents a list of the COPCs that are being removed from the total list of COPCs for this reason. Table1 -8. COPCs Addressed by Concurrent D amp;D Activities.... In PAGE 25: ...10.3 Other Contaminant of Potential Concern Exclusions Table1 -9 presents a list of all other COPCs to be excluded from the investigation. These exclusions are in addition to the exclusions identified in Table 1-8 and are based on physical laws, process knowledge, project focus, or other mitigating factors.... In PAGE 25: ....10.3 Other Contaminant of Potential Concern Exclusions Table 1-9 presents a list of all other COPCs to be excluded from the investigation. These exclusions are in addition to the exclusions identified in Table1 -8 and are based on physical laws, process knowledge, project focus, or other mitigating factors. Table 1-9 provides the... In PAGE 25: ... These exclusions are in addition to the exclusions identified in Table 1-8 and are based on physical laws, process knowledge, project focus, or other mitigating factors. Table1 -9 provides the... In PAGE 26: ...Rev. 0 1-13 Table1 -9. Rationale for COPC Exclusions.... In PAGE 26: ... It was not found in the 105-DR FSB above the minimum detectable activity. Consistent with the discussion in the 105-F and 105-DR Phase III DQO ( Table1 -7 in BHI 1999), it will be eliminated as a COC at other reactors, as it was not found in sufficient quantity to be a concern for the interim closure of the reactor structures. K-40 This is a naturally occurring isotope.... In PAGE 27: ...10.4 Final List of Contaminants of Concern Table1 -10 presents the final list of COCs for each waste stream number to be carried through the remainder of the DQO process. Table 1-10.... In PAGE 27: ....10.4 Final List of Contaminants of Concern Table 1-10 presents the final list of COCs for each waste stream number to be carried through the remainder of the DQO process. Table1 -10. Final List of COCs.... In PAGE 27: ...10.5 Distribution of Contaminants of Concern Table1 -11 identifies the best understanding of how each of the COCs arrived at the facility and the fate and transport mechanisms (e.g.... In PAGE 27: ...istribution (e.g., layering or lateral homogeneity) of each of the COCs. Table1 -11. Distribution of COCs.... In PAGE 28: ... 0 1-15 1.11 CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE The current and potential future uses for the land in the immediate vicinity of the facility under investigation are summarized in Table1 -12. This information is needed later in the DQO process to support the evaluation of decision error consequences.... In PAGE 28: ... This information is needed later in the DQO process to support the evaluation of decision error consequences. Table1 -12. Current and Potential Future Land Use.... In PAGE 28: ... 1.12 PRELIMINARY ACTION LEVELS The preliminary action levels that apply to each of the COCs are presented in Table1 -13 with the basis for each level. The action level is defined as the threshold value that provides the criterion for choosing between alternative actions.... In PAGE 28: ... The final numerical action level will be set in DQO Step 5. Table1 -13. List of Preliminary Action Levels.... In PAGE 29: ... The conceptual site model is continuously being refined as more data become available. Table1 -14 presents a tabular depiction of the conceptual site model, identifying the sources, release mechanisms, migration pathways, and potential receptors for each of the COCs. Table 1-14.... In PAGE 29: ... Table 1-14 presents a tabular depiction of the conceptual site model, identifying the sources, release mechanisms, migration pathways, and potential receptors for each of the COCs. Table1 -14. Tabular Depiction of the Conceptual Site Model.... ..."

"... In PAGE 1: ... Mandatory validation guidelines proposed by Straub, Boudreau and Gefen (2004, p. 385, Table1 ) and encompassing content validity, construct validity and reliability aspects of validity were used to guide the research reported in this paper. ... In PAGE 13: ...ore conceptual than statistical Hair et al (1998, p. 99), a number of authors (e.g. Hair et al 1998, Field 2000, Segars 1997) provide guidelines for numerical assessment of survey data against factor analysis assumptions. These guidelines and corresponding assessment of the survey data are summarised in Table1 . As is evident from Table 1, data collected in the Information Quality survey satisfies requirements of exploratory factor analysis methodology.... In PAGE 13: ... These guidelines and corresponding assessment of the survey data are summarised in Table 1. As is evident from Table1 , data collected in the Information Quality survey satisfies requirements of exploratory factor analysis methodology. Table 1.... In PAGE 14: ...14 In addition to the minimum requirements described in Table1 , Hair et al (1998) and others (e.g.... ..."

"... In PAGE 9: ...able 11. Long-Term Shoreline Change Rates ..................................................36 Table12 .... In PAGE 65: ... Sediment budgets formulated for the study area, especially on the regional scale, are limited by this lack of knowledge. Data sources available for this study are summarized in Table12 . This table also contains comments about quality and quantity of data.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ...* Applying this transformation technique to all other measured properties we get a set of comparable parameters as this way the effect of different measurement units is eliminated. Table1 shows a simple example** comparing two parameters of seven different simulated genuine leather materials used for shoe uppers. Table1 Computation of scale values Surface ... In PAGE 11: ...easurement used. To exclude the effect of scales, the basic data are normalized, i.e. each property is divided by the standard deviation of that particular property. Applying this to the two parameters used in Table1 will result in the scatter plot shown on Fig. 6.... ..."

"... In PAGE 5: ...I. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 28 TABLES AND FIGURES Table1 : Community Types .... ..."

"... In PAGE 11: ... (1994), Mays and Pope (1995), Devers (1999) and Patton (1999), a combination of areas and criteria were identified in order to assess the quality of IS case research. As shown in Table4 , the first area, Design of the case study, refers to those characteristics associated with the design of the study such as, the nature of the research purpose and research questions, as well as the criteria adopted for selecting the cases. The second area, Conduct of the case study, is basically concerned with the overall quality of the data collection process.... ..."