this paper is to investigate the effect of including baseline measures, as opposed to analysis without baseline, in the 2 \Theta 2 cross-over design. This will be done via the two approaches proposed by Kenward and Jones and mentioned above; the results will be presented and compared. 2 A Standard

), some that are significantly larger (and hence discriminative) than the MSERs, may be used to establish tentative correspondences. The high utility of MSERs, multiple measurement regions and the robust metric is demonstrated in wide-baseline experiments on image pairs from both indoor and outdoor scenes

Extensive measurements of smoke exposure among wild-land firefighters are summarized, showing that firefighters can be exposed to significant levels of carbon monoxide and res-piratory irritants, including formaldehyde, acrolein, and res-pirable particulate matter. Benzene was also measured

Abstract not found

be magnetically distinguished from non-haunted areas in the natural setting. However, none of these stud-ies have employed appropriate time-linked baseline measurements taken from haunted and baseline areas simultaneously. This study presents the first magnetic investigation of a reputedly haunted lo

model (that of Collins [1999]) with evidence from an additional 500,000 features over parse trees that were not included in the original model. The new model achieved 89.75 % F-measure, a 13 % relative decrease in F-measure error over the baseline model’s score of 88.2%. The article also introduces a

tumour measurements predict survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Study Objective: To determine if a single bone mass mea-surement of the radius is predictive of future fractures at any site. Design: Observational study of a cohort of free-living sub-jects and a cohort of retirement-home residents with an av-erage follow-up of 6.7 years and 5.5 years

that such a baseline measure will provide a strong platform to compare and better understand future annotation techniques. 1

contract NAG-l-190.]he viewsand conclusions contained in this doc,:ment are those of the authors and Should not be interpreted as representing the official po!icies, either expressed or implied, of NASA, the United States Governmef}t or Ccrnegie-Mellon University.