### Table 3 - Overall results for PLC and SVM two-level classifiers

### Table 4. Performance of our partial key-recovery attack against two-level E0

2004

"... In PAGE 10: ... To summarize, we have T = m + 24(2+ ) min(m; 28+5 ). Table4 lists the best complexities of our partial key-recovery attack corresponding to = 1; : : : ; 4. Note that the success probability of the attack in the table is estimated according to the hypothesis test result of Eq.... ..."

Cited by 4

### Table 6: Numerically obtained convergence rates observed for the di erent two-level block- relaxation methods with optimal damping parameters as in Table 3.

2002

"... In PAGE 23: ... From the slope we estimate the convergence rates for the di erent two-level algorithms. Table6 shows the results and we see that the observed rates in the numerical experiments coincide well with the spectral radii obtained by Fourier analysis as shown in Table 4. 7.... ..."

Cited by 1

### Table 5: Comparison of Estimates (Strip Size, Time) Machine Test L Optimal Two-Level One-Level

### Table 4 Estimated Marginal Means for the Two Levels of Bandwidth Dependent Variable: RESPONSE

### Table 1: Two-level aggregation examples.

2006

"... In PAGE 3: ... XPORT customizes its function- ality and optimization framework to respect these constraints. Table1 shows the different aggregation function combinations along with some example metrics. 2.... ..."

Cited by 5

### Table 6: Two-level Clustering.

2004

Cited by 1

### Table 1: The Nine Variations of Two-Level Adaptive

1993

Cited by 234

### Table 3: Ratios of speedups of a two-level HPAM

"... In PAGE 7: ...1 and actual hardware costs indicates the two-level organization is best in almost all the cases. Table3 shows the ratios of speedups of a two- level HPAM to a one-level HPAM. The second level of the two-level HPAM and the one-level HPAM have the same number and type of processors.... In PAGE 7: ...01 for values of MPD = 10, 100 and 1000 respec- tively. The results of Table3 show that these condi- tions are met for almost all the benchmarks and values of MDP. In some cases the gain factor is as high as 8.... ..."

### Table 2: Two-level implementation of MCNC benchmark FSMs

"... In PAGE 3: ... It may be better not to reduce the FSM before decomposing it. Two-level implementation ( Table2 ): For 5 of 7 ex- amples the decomposition obtains a smaller area than the lumped machine (29% - 63%). For all ex- amples the component machines are smaller than the lumped machine.... ..."