Abstract not found

Abstract | This review provides an introduction to Sup-

Abstract not found

accommodate the otherwise limiting quantizer of conventional ADCs. In this thesis, we consider a different approach to CS ADC by shifting towards lower quantizer bit-depths rather than lower sampling rates. We explore the extreme case where each measurement is quantized to just one bit, representing its sign

Treatment plan optimization for rotating-shield brachytherapy

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggesstions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA, 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any oenalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. a. REPORT Heterogeneous multi-metric learning for multi-sensor fusion 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: In this paper, we propose a multiple-metric learning algorithm to learn jointly a set of optimal homogenous/heterogeneous metrics in order to fuse the data collected from multiple sensors for classification. The learned metrics have the potential to perform better than the conventional Euclidean metric for classification. Moreover, in the case of heterogenous sensors, the learned multiple metrics can be quite different, which are adapted to each type of sensor. By learning the multiple metrics jointly within a single unified optimization

We are surrounded by electronic devices that take advantage of wireless technologies, from our computer mice, which require little amounts of information, to our cellphones, which demand increasingly higher data rates. Until today, the coexistence of such a variety of services has been guaranteed by a fixed assignment of spectrum resources by regulatory agencies. This has resulted into a blind alley, as current wireless spectrum has become an expensive and a scarce resource. However, recent measurements in dense areas paint a very different picture: there is an actual underutilization of the spectrum by legacy sys-tems. Cognitive radio exhibits a tremendous promise for increasing the spectral efficiency for future wireless systems. Ideally, new secondary users would have a perfect panorama of the spectrum usage, and would opportunistically communicate over the available re-sources without degrading the primary systems. Yet in practice, monitoring the spectrum resources, detecting available resources for opportunistic communication, and transmit-ting over the resources are hard tasks. This thesis addresses the tasks of monitoring, de-

Parametric max-stable processes are increasingly used to model spatial extremes. Since the dependence structure is specified for block maxima, the data used for inference are block maxima from all sites. To improve the estimation efficiency, we propose a two-step approach with composite likelihood that utilizes site-wise daily records in addition to block maxima. Besides the parameter estimation, there is no formal model checking and diagnosis method for spatial extremes modeling yet. Model diagnosis in practice has been informal and mostly based on visual checking tools such as residual plot and quantile-quantile plot. We proposed a goodness-of-fit test for max-stable processes based on the comparison between a nonparametric and a parametric estimator of the corresponding unknown multivariate Pickands dependence function. The proposed two-step procedure separates the estimation of marginal parameters and dependence parameters into two steps. The first step estimates the marginal pa-rameters with an independence Likelihood by ignoring the spatial dependence. Given ithe marginal parameter estimates, the second step estimates the dependence parameters