"... In PAGE 13: ...831 0.114 Table5 gives the results of a similar experiment expressed in terms of the average rank measure. As in previous experiments, the magnitude of the effect is much more noticeable when this average rank of correct story measure is used.... ..."

"... In PAGE 8: ... Answers on travel agency stories: per story Answer on travel agency story * Story category on travel agency Crosstabulation Count Story category on travel agency positive stories negative stories more trust 24 24 less trust 3 27 30 Answer on travel agency story no change 13 13 26 Total 40 40 80 Table 5. Answers on travel agency stories: overall In Table4 one can see that all stories, except for positive story 2 and negative story 1, have the desired effect on the trust in the travel agency. Comparing the effects of the group of positive and negative stories about the travel agency (see Table 5), it is clear that there is a difference between the effects of the positive and negative stories.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... On the other hand, it can be concluded from [3], [4], and [17] that organisational, environmental1, and motivational perspectives are the most relevant ones for agent- oriented domain analysis. In Table1 , we have accordingly grouped the perspectives explained above as three viewpoint aspects. This table can be populated in many ways.... In PAGE 3: ... Similarly, at the PIM level, behaviour models are represented as Multi-Agent Behaviour Descriptions in PASSI [21], information models appear in MAS- CommonKADS [22] as Expertise Models, and interaction models are featured in Prometheus [14] as Interaction Diagrams and Interaction Protocols. The structure of Table1 is thus not associated with any specific software engineering methodology but provides a universal framework for classifying the kinds of models appearing in various methodologies and approaches. However, we have populated Table 1 in a specific way to cater for the needs of rapid prototyping 1 Since the environmental perspective in domain analysis deals with information that agents need about their physical and conceptual environments, it can be equalled with the informational perspective here.... In PAGE 3: ... The structure of Table 1 is thus not associated with any specific software engineering methodology but provides a universal framework for classifying the kinds of models appearing in various methodologies and approaches. However, we have populated Table1 in a specific way to cater for the needs of rapid prototyping 1 Since the environmental perspective in domain analysis deals with information that agents need about their physical and conceptual environments, it can be equalled with the informational perspective here. ... In PAGE 4: ...addressed by this article. In other words, we have selected the types of models appearing in Table1 because it has been shown earlier [23] that this combination of models facilitates rapid prototyping. The model types chosen by us originate in the ROADMAP [3, 4] and RAP/AOR [11] methodologies and in the Unified Modelling Language (UML) [12].... In PAGE 5: ... Taking this analogy, the Role Schema is the position description for a particular role. Table1 shows the Role Schema created for the role Restaurant shown in the Goal Model in Figure 2. Table 2.... In PAGE 8: ... Interactions can be found from responsibilities included by Role Schemas. The interaction frame diagram depicted in Figure 4 consists of two interaction frames that have been derived from the Role Schema shown in Table1 : one between the agents of a customer and the ordering centre, and the other one between the agents of the ordering centre and a restaurant. Messages in interaction frames have four modalities: request , inform , confirm , and reject .... ..."

"... In PAGE 13: ...831 0.114 Table5 gives the results of a similar experiment expressed in terms of the average rank measure. As in previous experiments, the magnitude of the effect is much more noticeable when this average rank of correct story measure is used.... ..."

"... In PAGE 7: ...t al., 2005]. 4.2 Synthesis Table1 shows the effect that each one of expressivity parameter has on the production of head movements, facial espressions and gestures. The Spatial Ex- tent (SPC) parameter modulates the amplitude of the movement of arms, wrists (involved in the animation of a gesture), head and eyebrows (involved in the animation of a facial expression); it influences how wide or narrow their dis- placement will be during the final animation.... ..."

"... In PAGE 2: ...Chi2=54.50, p lt; lt;0.001 for speaker 1, Chi2=33.23, p lt; lt;0.001 for speaker 2; see Table2 below for the number of occurrences and the distribution of morphological categories of words associated with an intensive gesture)2. If we look in more detail at the type of adverb associated with an intensive gesture, what comes out is that there is a much higher proportion (33.... ..."

"... In PAGE 3: ... Moreover, when one looks at the distribution of stress types (P, S, and F) when accompanied by an intensive gesture, one finds that no particular type of intensive gesture is in a one-to-one correspondence with any type of stress. Yet as shown in Table4 , intensive gestures seem to be highly associated with primary stress. But in fact, primary stress wasn apos;t significant (Chi2=2.... ..."

"... In PAGE 14: ...id the original (IP) health story (M = 12.50, SD = 3.374). Table2 details the statis- tically significant main effect of text structure, F(1, 112) = 5.... ..."

"... In PAGE 37: ... At the individual level, the initial essays incorporated one to three viewpoints, whereas the quot;nal essays one to six viewpoints. Table6 summarizes the theoretical viewpoints that emerged in each group. Table 6 shows that the cognitivist approach became more prevalent and the behaviorist approach lost favor in both groups during the course.... In PAGE 37: ... Table 6 summarizes the theoretical viewpoints that emerged in each group. Table6 shows that the cognitivist approach became more prevalent and the behaviorist approach lost favor in both groups during the course. We can see that constructivist statements were more common in the constructivist group at the end of the course, but they were more common at the beginning of the course as well.... In PAGE 37: ... As described earlier, various combinations of viewpoints were identi quot;ed at the individual level. Table6 , however, does not present individual changes (i.e.... ..."