### Table 1: Manipulator and Object Parameters

1996

"... In PAGE 26: ... The dynamic model for each manipulator was taken from [29]. The link and object parameters are given in Table1 . The object inertia matrix and Coriolis and gravity vector are Do = 2 6 6 6 6 6 4 0:2 0 0 0 0:2 0 0 0 0:02 3 7 7 7 7 7 5 ; Eo = 2 6 6 6 6 6 4 0 1:96 0 3 7 7 7 7 7 5 : (90) The motion of the manipulators and the object is depicted in Figure 3.... ..."

Cited by 9

### Table 1: Manipulator and Object Parameters

1996

"... In PAGE 26: ... The dynamic model for each manipulator was taken from #5B29#5D. The link and object parameters are given in Table1 . The object inertia matrix and Coriolis and gravity vector are D o = 2 6 6 6 6 6 4 0:2 0 0 0 0:2 0 0 0 0:02 3 7 7 7 7 7 5 ; E o = 2 6 6 6 6 6 4 0 1:96 0 3 7 7 7 7 7 5 : #2890#29 The motion of the manipulators and the object is depicted in Figure 3.... ..."

Cited by 9

### Table 1: Manipulator parameters

1998

"... In PAGE 4: ... Simulation Performace of the control laws are compared in a series of simulations of a 6-dof parallel-link manipulator. The important manipulator parameters are shown in Table1 . Actual param- eters are used in the simulation of the manipulator dynamics and the estimates are used in computing the control laws for the effects of parametric uncertainty.... ..."

### Table 2. The statistical results for dynamic manipulations.

1997

"... In PAGE 11: ... links that needed changes and the link update time among the three different models. Statistics are presented in Table2 to quantitatively illustrate the information obtained. We also tested the box room scene for the case of a decrease in the total net energy.... In PAGE 11: ... 10. The top part of Table2 lists the number of input surfaces, input objects, resulting elements, resulting links and its constituent parts, Obj.... In PAGE 11: ... The results show that the proposed progressive strategy effectively avoided unnecessary links, thus reducing the total rendering time. The bottom section of Table2 shows that the proposed dynamic framework rejected from 39.62% to 90.... In PAGE 11: ...inks in the scenes; hence, only 9.67% to 60.38% of the links required further visibility computation. The bottom line of Table2 gives link update times, including the time needed for the reject test, visibility computation, and image updating, for each scene. We can conclude that the link updating time was in proportion to both the model complexity and the number of resulting links, and was relatively small compared to the time needed for refine-... ..."

### Table 1: Manipulator parameters We assume that the robotic system has the following modeling uncertainties [15]: F = 2

1997

"... In PAGE 11: ... The dynamic equations of the robotic manipulator are given in [11]. The link parameters of the manipulator are given in Table1 [15].... ..."

Cited by 3

### Table 1: Optimal Policies under Parameter Uncertainty

1999

"... In PAGE 20: ... For present purposes, we de ne the allowable parameter region to include model coef- cients relating to the interest-sensitivity of spending that lie within two standard errors of their point estimates and coe cients relating to the slope of the Phillips curve that lie within one standard error of their point estimates.6 The upper portion of Table1 shows the optimal simple rules for ve values of , assuming no parameter uncertainty. The lower portion of the table shows the corre- sponding robust control simple rules.... ..."

Cited by 4

### Table 1: Optimal Policies under Parameter Uncertainty

1999

"... In PAGE 20: ... For present purposes, we de#0Cne the allowable parameter region to include model coef- #0Ccients relating to the interest-sensitivityofspending that lie within two standard errors of their point estimates and coe#0Ecients relating to the slope of the Phillips curve that lie within one standard error of their point estimates. 6 The upper portion of Table1 shows the optimal simple rules for #0Cvevalues of #15, assuming no parameter uncertainty. The lower portion of the table shows the corre- sponding robust control simple rules.... ..."

Cited by 4

### Table 2: Basic object manipulations

2000

"... In PAGE 4: ... The reference r 0 is implicitly passed as a parameter to the method. Table2 depicts the elemental object manipulations performed byeach of these statements. We assume that the program has been preprocessed such that all statements that per- form object manipulations have been expressed in the form of these basic statements.... ..."

Cited by 9