Results 1 -
5 of
5
Premise selection and external provers for HOL4
- In Certified Programs and Proofs (CPP’15), Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, 2015
"... Learning-assisted automated reasoning has recently gained popularity among the users of Isabelle/HOL, HOL Light, and Mizar. In this paper, we present an add-on to the HOL4 proof assistant and an adaptation of the HOL(y)Hammer system that provides machine learning-based premise selection and automate ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Learning-assisted automated reasoning has recently gained popularity among the users of Isabelle/HOL, HOL Light, and Mizar. In this paper, we present an add-on to the HOL4 proof assistant and an adaptation of the HOL(y)Hammer system that provides machine learning-based premise selection
Initial Experiments with External Provers and Premise Selection on HOL Light Corpora
"... This paper reports our initial experiments with using external ATP and premise selec-tion methods on some corpora built with the HOL Light system. The testing is done in three different settings, corresponding to those used earlier for evaluating such methods on the Mizar/MML corpus. This is intende ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 2 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper reports our initial experiments with using external ATP and premise selec-tion methods on some corpora built with the HOL Light system. The testing is done in three different settings, corresponding to those used earlier for evaluating such methods on the Mizar/MML corpus
and
, 2015
"... Effective support for custom proof automation is essential for large-scale interactive proof develop-ment. However, existing languages for automation via tactics either (a) provide no way to specify the behavior of tactics within the base logic of the accompanying theorem prover, or (b) rely on adva ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Effective support for custom proof automation is essential for large-scale interactive proof develop-ment. However, existing languages for automation via tactics either (a) provide no way to specify the behavior of tactics within the base logic of the accompanying theorem prover, or (b) rely
Learning-Assisted Automated Reasoning with Flyspeck
"... The considerable mathematical knowledge encoded by the Flyspeck project is combined with external automated theorem provers (ATPs) and machine-learning premise selection methods trained on the Flyspeck proofs, producing an AI system capable of proving a wide range of mathematical conjectures autom ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
The considerable mathematical knowledge encoded by the Flyspeck project is combined with external automated theorem provers (ATPs) and machine-learning premise selection methods trained on the Flyspeck proofs, producing an AI system capable of proving a wide range of mathematical conjectures
Chapter 12 Rough Sets and Rough Logic: A KDD Perspective
"... Abstract Basic ideas of rough set theory were proposed by Zdzis law Pawlak [85, 86] in the early 1980’s. In the ensuing years, we have witnessed a systematic, world–wide growth of interest in rough sets and their applications. The main goal of rough set analysis is induction of approximations of con ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract Basic ideas of rough set theory were proposed by Zdzis law Pawlak [85, 86] in the early 1980’s. In the ensuing years, we have witnessed a systematic, world–wide growth of interest in rough sets and their applications. The main goal of rough set analysis is induction of approximations of con-cepts. This main goal is motivated by the basic fact, constituting also the main problem of KDD, that languages we may choose for knowledge description are incomplete. A fortiori, we have to describe concepts of interest (features, proper-ties, relations etc.) not completely but by means of their reflections (i.e. approx-imations) in the chosen language. The most important issues in this induction process are: – construction of relevant primitive concepts from which approximations of more complex concepts are assembled, – measures of inclusion and similarity (closeness) on concepts, – construction of operations producing complex concepts from the primitive ones.